Isolated Radial Head/Neck Fractures

2022 ◽  
pp. 355-363
Author(s):  
Robert A. Kaufmann ◽  
Leigh-Anne Tu
Keyword(s):  
Radial Head ◽  
Head Neck

Fractures of the Olecranon, Radial Head/Neck, and Coronoid Process

2014 ◽  
pp. 1451-1478
Author(s):  
Peter Kloen ◽  
Thomas Christian Koslowsky ◽  
Konrad Mader
Keyword(s):  
Radial Head ◽  
Coronoid Process ◽  
Head Neck

scholarly journals Comparison of Exposure in the Kaplan Versus the Kocher Approach in the Treatment of Radial Head Fractures

Hand ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 253-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leslie Fink Barnes ◽  
Joseph Lombardi ◽  
Thomas R. Gardner ◽  
Robert J. Strauch ◽  
Melvin P. Rosenwasser
Keyword(s):  
Surface Area ◽  
Radial Head ◽  
Lateral Collateral Ligament ◽  
Radial Head Fractures ◽  
3 Dimensional ◽  
Average Surface Area ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Head Neck

Background: The aim of this study was to compare the complete visible surface area of the radial head, neck, and coronoid in the Kaplan and Kocher approaches to the lateral elbow. The hypothesis was that the Kaplan approach would afford greater visibility due to the differential anatomy of the intermuscular planes. Methods: Ten cadavers were dissected with the Kaplan and Kocher approaches, and the visible surface area was measured in situ using a 3-dimensional digitizer. Six measurements were taken for each approach by 2 surgeons, and the mean of these measurements were analyzed. Results: The mean surface area visible with the lateral collateral ligament (LCL) preserved in the Kaplan approach was 616.6 mm2 in comparison with the surface area of 136.2 mm2 visible in the Kocher approach when the LCL was preserved. Using a 2-way analysis of variance, the difference between these 2 approaches was statistically significant. When the LCL complex was incised in the Kocher approach, the average visible surface area of the Kocher approach was 456.1 mm2 and was statistically less than the Kaplan approach. The average surface area of the coronoid visible using a proximally extended Kaplan approach was 197.8 mm2. Conclusions: The Kaplan approach affords significantly greater visible surface area of the proximal radius than the Kocher approach.

Radial Head/Neck Fracture

2011 ◽  
pp. 45-54
Author(s):  
Sameer Badarudeen ◽  
Robert M. Bernstein ◽  
Saul M. Bernstein
Keyword(s):  
Radial Head ◽  
Neck Fracture ◽  
Head Neck

Comparison of radial head excision and open reduction & internal fixation for comminuted radial head & neck fracture

2001 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 106
Author(s):  
Jae-Gune Jun ◽  
Chul-Hyung Lee ◽  
Sung-Jun Han ◽  
Sang-Seon Lee ◽  
Won-Tae Choi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Radial Head ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Open Reduction Internal Fixation ◽  
Neck Fracture ◽  
Radial Head Excision ◽  
Head Neck

Reliability of fat-pad sign in radial head/neck fractures of the elbow

Injury ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 28 (7) ◽  
pp. 433-435 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Irshad ◽  
N.J. Shaw ◽  
R.J.H. Gregory
Keyword(s):  
Radial Head ◽  
Fat Pad ◽  
Fat Pad Sign ◽  
Head Neck

Failure of Adjustably Aligned Modular Radial Head Arthroplasty With Head-Neck Dissociation and Metallosis

2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 253.e1-253.e5
Author(s):  
John Erickson ◽  
James X. Liu ◽  
Steven Z. Glickel
Keyword(s):  
Radial Head ◽  
Radial Head Arthroplasty ◽  
Head Neck
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document