Assessment of CO2 capture and storage from thermal power plants in Argentina

Author(s):  
N AMADEO ◽  
H BAJANO ◽  
J COMAS ◽  
J DAVERIO ◽  
M LABORDE ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 96 ◽  
pp. 105173
Author(s):  
Bo Yang ◽  
Yi-Ming Wei ◽  
Lan-Cui Liu ◽  
Yun-Bing Hou ◽  
Kun Zhang ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1521-1526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin Alie ◽  
Peter L. Douglas ◽  
John Davison

2017 ◽  
Vol 114 ◽  
pp. 95-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Kanniche ◽  
Yann Le Moullec ◽  
Olivier Authier ◽  
Hayato Hagi ◽  
Domitille Bontemps ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Farshid Zabihian ◽  
Alan S. Fung

CO2 capture and storage (CCS) systems are technologies that can be used to reduce CO2 emissions by different industries where combustion is part of the process. A major problem of CCS system utilization in electricity generation industry is their high efficiency penalty in power plants. For different types of power plants fueled by oil, natural gas and coal, there are three main techniques that can be applied: • CO2 capture after combustion (post-combustion); • CO2 capture after concentration of flue gas by using pure oxygen in boilers and furnaces (oxy-fuel power plant); • CO2 capture before combustion (pre-combustion). More than 90% of electricity generation in Iran is based on fossil fuel power plants. Worldwide, electricity generation is responsible for 54% of GHG emissions. Thus, it is vital to reduce CO2 emission in fossil fuel-fired power plants. In this paper, it is shown that, by applying CO2 capture systems in power generation industry, very low CO2 emission intensity is possible but the energy and economic penalties are substantial. The analyses showed that for different technologies efficiency penalty could be as high as 25% and cost of electricity might increase by more than 65%. Two scenarios for Iranian electricity generation sector were investigated in this paper: installing CCS in the existing power plants with current technologies and replacing existing power plants by natural gas combined cycle plants equipped with CO2 capture system. The results revealed that the GHG intensity can be reduced from 610 to 79 gCO2eq/kWh in the first scenario and to 54 gCO2eq/kWh in the second scenario.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document