Zirconia-ceramic versus metal-ceramic posterior multiunit tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses

2020 ◽  
Vol 151 (4) ◽  
pp. 230-238.e7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alvaro Limones ◽  
Pedro Molinero-Mourelle ◽  
Luis Azevedo ◽  
Marta Romeo-Rubio ◽  
André Correia ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (S16) ◽  
pp. 184-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irena Sailer ◽  
Malin Strasding ◽  
Nicola Alberto Valente ◽  
Marcel Zwahlen ◽  
Shiming Liu ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 76 ◽  
pp. 32-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irena Sailer ◽  
Marc Balmer ◽  
Jürg Hüsler ◽  
Christoph Hans Franz Hämmerle ◽  
Sarah Känel ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdulaziz Samran ◽  
Mohammad Zakaria Nassani ◽  
Marwan Aswad ◽  
Amid Abdulkarim

The aim of this paper is to report a clinical case with bilateral missing mandibular second premolars that were restored by metal-ceramic inlay-retained fixed dental prostheses. The first prosthesis was of a traditional design and the second was of a modified design. The suggested design is created by modifying the retainer wings of the traditional resin-bonded inlay-retained fixed dental prosthesis and covering the wings with composite resin. The modified design is relatively conservative, esthetic and provides an extra element for the retention of posterior metal-ceramic inlay-retained fixed dental prostheses.


2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 73-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josephine F. Esquivel-Upshaw ◽  
Arthur E. Clark ◽  
Jonathan J. Shuster ◽  
Kenneth J. Anusavice

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document