scholarly journals Age-specific differences in patient reported outcomes among adults with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: Medical expenditure panel survey 2006–2015

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 100083
Author(s):  
Victor Okunrintemi ◽  
Eve-Marie A. Benson ◽  
Ouassim Derbal ◽  
Michael D. Miedema ◽  
Roger S. Blumenthal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Medical Expenditure Panel Survey ◽  
Medical Expenditure ◽  
Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Panel Survey ◽  
Patient Reported

scholarly journals Nondietary Cardiovascular Health Metrics With Patient Experience and Loss of Productivity Among US Adults Without Cardiovascular Disease: The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey 2006 to 2015

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (19) ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Tibuakuu ◽  
Victor Okunrintemi ◽  
Nazir Savji ◽  
Neil J. Stone ◽  
Salim S. Virani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Medical Expenditure Panel Survey ◽  
Medical Expenditure ◽  
Panel Survey ◽  
Health Related Quality ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related

Background The American Heart Association 2020 Impact Goals aimed to promote population health through emphasis on cardiovascular health (CVH). We examined the association between nondietary CVH metrics and patient‐reported outcomes among a nationally representative sample of US adults without cardiovascular disease. Methods and Results We included adults aged ≥18 years who participated in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey between 2006 and 2015. CVH metrics were scored 1 point for each of the following: not smoking, being physically active, normal body mass index, no hypertension, no diabetes mellitus, and no dyslipidemia, or 0 points if otherwise. Diet was not assessed in Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Patient‐reported outcomes were obtained by telephone survey and included questions pertaining to patient experience and health‐related quality of life. Regression models were used to compare patient‐reported outcomes based on CVH, adjusting for sociodemographic factors and comorbidities. There were 177 421 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey participants (mean age, 45 [17] years) representing ~187 million US adults without cardiovascular disease. About 12% (~21 million US adults) had poor CVH. Compared with individuals with optimal CVH, those with poor CVH had higher odds of reporting poor patient‐provider communication (odds ratio, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.05–1.24), poor healthcare satisfaction (odds ratio, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.08–1.22), poor perception of health (odds ratio, 5.89; 95% CI, 5.35–6.49), at least 2 disability days off work (odds ratio, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.30–1.48), and lower health‐related quality of life scores. Conclusions Among US adults without cardiovascular disease, meeting a lower number of ideal CVH metrics is associated with poor patient‐reported healthcare experience, poor perception of health, and lower health‐related quality of life. Preventive measures aimed at optimizing ideal CVH metrics may improve patient‐reported outcomes among this population.

Abstract 189: Income Level Disparities in Consumer Reported Domains of Healthcare Experience Among Those With Established Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in United States: Insights From Medical Expenditure Panel Survey 2010-2013

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor Okunrintemi ◽  
Erica Spatz ◽  
Joseph Salami ◽  
Paul D Capua ◽  
Haider Warraich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Medical Expenditure Panel Survey ◽  
Medical Expenditure ◽  
Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Panel Survey ◽  
Provider Satisfaction ◽  
Healthcare Experience ◽  
Patient Reported

Background: While it is well established that significant health outcome disparities exist across patients of varying socio-economic status (SES) with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), disparities in patients’ healthcare experiences are not well investigated. We explore income level differences in four central tenets of patient-reported healthcare experience (access to care, provider communication, shared decision making and provider satisfaction) as measured by the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) survey, in a nationally representative adult US population with established ASCVD. Methods: The study population consisted of 8223 individuals (age ≥ 18 years) representing 21.6 million with established ASCVD (self-reported or ICD-9 diagnosis) reporting a usual source of care in the 2010-2013 pooled Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) cohort. We assessed the responses for each item as: a) difficult access to care (always/almost difficult), b) ineffective communication and shared decision making (never/sometimes), and c) poor provider satisfaction (lowest quartile on a scale of 0-10). We examined the relationship between scores in the lowest quartile of each domain composite scores, derived using the weighted average response from each items scores, with patients’ SES, using the high-income group as reference. Results: Lower SES was consistently associated with greater perceived difficulties in access, poor provider-patient communication, less shared decision making, as well as lower provider satisfaction (Table). Participants classified as poor vs. high income were 47% (95% CI 1.17-1.83) more likely to report difficulty accessing care, 39% (95% CI 1.09-1.78) and 26% (95% CI 0.99-1.60) reported a higher likelihood of experiencing poor communication and shared decision making respectively, as well as a 66% (95% CI 1.31-2.11) higher likelihood of reporting lower provider satisfaction. Conclusion: Among patients with established ASCVD, significant SES disparities exist in all domains of patient reported healthcare experience quality of care metrics. Targeted policies focusing on improving communication, engagement and satisfaction are needed to enhance patient healthcare experience among high-risk vulnerable populations.

Abstract 25: Patient-reported Outcomes, Resource Utilization, and Healthcare Expenditures Across the 3 Major Atherosclerotic Diseases: The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (meps)

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Tibuakuu ◽  
Victor Okunrintemi ◽  
Andi Shahu ◽  
Ratchford V Ratchford ◽  
Nazir Savji ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Medical Expenditure Panel Survey ◽  
Medical Expenditure ◽  
Panel Survey ◽  
Health Campaigns ◽  
Healthcare Expenditures ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Artery Disease ◽  
Public Health Campaigns

Background: Public health campaigns aimed at reducing the morbidity, mortality and economic burden of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) have mainly targeted coronary artery disease (CAD). Stroke and peripheral artery disease (PAD) are associated with substantial medical and financial burden for patients and the US healthcare system. Objective: We sought to compare the associations of patient-reported outcomes, resource utilization, and healthcare expenditures across the 3 major ASCVD types (CAD, stroke, or PAD). Methods: We used data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) conducted between 2006-2015 and included adults aged ≥18 yrs. MEPS is a nationally representative US sample and provides information on patient-reported outcomes (PROs), medical conditions, healthcare utilization and expenditures. The ASCVD types were ascertained by ICD-9 codes and/or self-reported data. Participants with more than 1 ASCVD type were not included. The associations of PROs and health utilization were quantified and contrasted across the 3 ASCVD types using multivariable adjusted regression models. A 2-part econometric model was used to assess healthcare expenditures. Results: The study sample included 14,262 MEPS participants with 1 type of ASCVD, translating into 15.9 million US adults. The mean age (SD) was 65 (±14) yrs; 48% were women, 59.6% had the diagnosis of CAD only, 37.5% stroke only, and 2.9% PAD only. Participants with stroke were more likely to report poor patient-provider communication [OR 1.37 (95% CI 1.18-1.59)], poor healthcare satisfaction, and more ED visits, and were less likely to be on a statin and aspirin, compared to CAD ( Table ). Participants with PAD also had higher odds of not being on aspirin [3.10 (2.31-4.16)] and statin [2.01 (1.37-2.95)], compared to CAD. PAD was associated with the highest annual total and out-of-pocket expenditures among the 3 ASCVDs. Conclusion: Both stroke and PAD were associated with low uptake of guideline-directed preventive therapies, compared to CAD, with PAD having the highest healthcare expenditures among the 3 ASCVD types. Our results highlight a missed opportunity for secondary ASCVD prevention among patients with PAD and stroke, and the need for public health campaigns to direct equal attention to all 3 major ASCVDs.

Abstract 002: Patient Provider Communication and Patient-centered Outcomes Among Patients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in United States: Medical Expenditure Panel Survey 2010-2013

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor Okunrintemi ◽  
Erica Spatz ◽  
Joseph Salami ◽  
Haider Warraich ◽  
Salim Virani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Medical Expenditure Panel Survey ◽  
Medical Expenditure ◽  
Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Centered Care ◽  
Nationally Representative

Background: With recent enactment of Accountable Care Act, consumer reported patient-provider communication (PPC) assessed by Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Survey (CAHPS) in ambulatory settings is incorporated as a complementary value metric for patient-centered care of chronic conditions in pay-for-performance programs. In this study, we examine the relationship of PPC with select indicators of patient-centered care in a nationally representative adult US population with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Methods: The study population consisted of a nationally representative sample of 8223 individuals (age ≥ 18 years) representing 21.6 million with established ASCVD (self-reported or ICD-9 diagnosis) reporting a usual source of care in the 2010-2013 pooled Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) cohort. Participants responded to questions from CAHPS that assess satisfaction with PPC (four-point response scale: never, sometimes, usually, always ) :(1) “How often providers show respect for what you had to say” (2) “How often health care providers listened carefully to you” (3) “How often health care providers explained things so you understood” (4) “How often health providers spent enough time with you” We developed a weighted PPC composite score, categorized as 1 ( never / sometimes ), 2 ( usually ), and 3 ( always ). Outcomes of interest were 1) patient reported outcomes (PRO): SF-12 physical/mental health status, 2) quality of care measures: statin and ASA use, 3) health-care resource utilization (HRU): Emergency room visits & hospital stays, 4) total annual and out of pocket healthcare expenditures (HCE). Results: As shown in the table, those with ASCVD reporting ineffective (never/sometimes) vs. effective PCC (always) were over 2-fold more likely to report poor PRO, 34% & 22% less likely to report statin and ASA use respectively, had a significantly greater HRU (OR≥ 2 ER visit: 1.40 [95% CI:1.09-1.80], OR≥ 2 hospitalization: 1.35 [95% CI:1.02-1.77], as well as an estimated $1,294 ($121-2468) higher annual HCE. Conclusion: This study reveals a strong relationship between patient-physician communication among those with established ASCVD with patient-reported outcomes, utilization of evidence based therapies, healthcare resource utilization and expenditures.

scholarly journals Sex Differences in the Age of Diagnosis for Cardiovascular Disease and Its Risk Factors Among US Adults: Trends From 2008 to 2017, the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (24) ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor Okunrintemi ◽  
Martin Tibuakuu ◽  
Salim S. Virani ◽  
Laurence S. Sperling ◽  
Annabelle Santos Volgman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Coronary Heart Disease ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Medical Expenditure Panel Survey ◽  
Medical Expenditure ◽  
Age At Diagnosis ◽  
Panel Survey ◽  
Cvd Risk Factors ◽  
Cvd Risk

Background Sex differences in the trends for control of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors have been described, but temporal trends in the age at which CVD and its risk factors are diagnosed and sex‐specific differences in these trends are unknown. Methods and Results We used the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey 2008 to 2017, a nationally representative sample of the US population. Individuals ≥18 years, with a diagnosis of hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, coronary heart disease, or stroke, and who reported the age when these conditions were diagnosed, were included. We included 100 709 participants (50.2% women), representing 91.9 million US adults with above conditions. For coronary heart disease and hypercholesterolemia, mean age at diagnosis was 1.06 and 0.92 years older for women, compared with men, respectively (both P <0.001). For stroke, mean age at diagnosis for women was 1.20 years younger than men ( P <0.001). The mean age at diagnosis of CVD risk factors became younger over time, with steeper declines among women (annual decrease, hypercholesterolemia [women, 0.31 years; men 0.24 years] and hypertension [women, 0.23 years; men, 0.20 years]; P <0.001). Coronary heart disease was not statistically significant. For stroke, while age at diagnosis decreased by 0.19 years annually for women ( P =0.03), it increased by 0.22 years for men ( P =0.02). Conclusions The trend in decreasing age at diagnosis for CVD and its risk factors in the United States appears to be more pronounced among women. While earlier identification of CVD risk factors may provide opportunity to initiate preventive treatment, younger age at diagnosis of CVD highlights the need for the prevention of CVD earlier in life, and sex‐specific interventions may be needed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document