scholarly journals 274O Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) changes with veliparib in patients (pts) with metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer in the phase III BROCADE 3 study

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. S348-S349
Author(s):  
V. Dieras ◽  
B. Arun ◽  
H.S. Han ◽  
H. Wildiers ◽  
M. Friedlander ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 175883592094306
Author(s):  
Nadia Harbeck ◽  
Fabio Franke ◽  
Rafael Villanueva-Vazquez ◽  
Yen-Shen Lu ◽  
Debu Tripathy ◽  
...  

Background: This analysis evaluated patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in the phase III MONALEESA-7 trial, which previously demonstrated improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with ribociclib (cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor) + endocrine therapy (ET) compared with placebo + ET in pre- and perimenopausal patients with hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative (HR+/HER2−) advanced breast cancer (ABC). Methods: The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life questionnaire C30 (QLQ-C30) and the EQ-5D-5L were used to evaluate HRQoL. Results: EORTC QLQ-C30 assessments were evaluable for 335 patients in the ribociclib arm and 337 patients in the placebo arm. Adherence rates at baseline and ⩾1 postbaseline time point were 90% and 83%, respectively. Patients treated with ribociclib + ET had a longer time to deterioration (TTD) ⩾ 10% in global HRQoL {hazard ratio (HR), 0.67 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.52–0.86]}. TTD ⩾ 10% in global HRQoL was delayed in ribociclib-treated patients without versus with disease progression [HR, 0.31 (95% CI, 0.21–0.48)]. TTD ⩾ 10% in pain was longer with ribociclib + ET than with placebo + ET [HR, 0.65 (95% CI, 0.45–0.92)]. Patients who received a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor experienced similar benefits with ribociclib versus placebo in global HRQoL and pain. Conclusion: HRQoL was maintained longer in patients who received ribociclib + ET versus placebo + ET. These data, combined with previously reported improvements in PFS and OS, support a strong clinical benefit-to-risk ratio with ribociclib-based treatment in pre- and perimenopausal patients with HR+/HER2− ABC.


The Breast ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
pp. 108-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caterina Calderon ◽  
Alberto Carmona-Bayonas ◽  
Raquel Hernández ◽  
Ismael Ghanem ◽  
Beatriz Castelo ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 272-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Fallowfield ◽  
D. Patrick ◽  
J. Body ◽  
A. Lipton ◽  
K. S. Tonkin ◽  
...  

272 Background: Patients with breast cancer and bone metastases often experience skeletal-related events (SREs) and pain, which can impact health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Denosumab is superior to zoledronic acid (ZA) in preventing SREs and more effective in delaying moderate or severe pain in patients with advanced breast cancer. We now describe the effect of denosumab or ZA treatment on HRQoL in these patients. Methods: Patients enrolled in this double-blind, double-dummy study were randomized to receive denosumab (120 mg SC) or ZA (4 mg IV) every 4 weeks. Patients completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) questionnaire at baseline (BL), day 8, and each monthly visit to assess overall HRQoL. Higher scores (range 0 to 108) reflect a better HRQoL. Changes in HRQoL were summarized through month 18, when 30% of patients had died or dropped out due to disease progression or withdrawal of consent. Increases or decreases of ≥ 5 points in the FACT-G total score were considered clinically meaningful. Pain was evaluated by the Brief Pain Inventory–Short Form (BPI-SF). HRQoL was assessed in subgroups with no/mild pain or moderate/severe pain at BL. Results: The BL mean (SD) FACT-G score was similar for denosumab (n = 956) 72.7 (16.4) and ZA (n = 952) 73.6 (16.5) groups and increased from BL to month18 for both groups reflecting improved HRQoL. An average of 3.2% more (range 0.9% to 6.8%) denosumab-treated patients than ZA-treated patients experienced a ≥ 5-point increase in HRQoL from months 1 to 18. Fewer denosumab than ZA-treated patients reported a ≥ 5-point decrease in HRQoL (average 2.7% fewer; range 0.6% to 5.8%). Among patients with no/mild pain at BL, an average of 4.1% more (range -0.6% to 9.3%) denosumab-treated patients had a ≥ 5-point increase in FACT-G score from month 4 to 18. In this same subgroup, fewer denosumab-treated patients had a ≥ 5-point decrease in HRQoL over 18 months (average 2.4% fewer; range -4.4% to 6.3%). Similar patterns in FACT-G scores were noted for the subgroup with moderate/severe pain at BL. Conclusions: In patients with advanced breast cancer, a greater proportion treated with denosumab than ZA had a meaningful improvement in HRQoL regardless of BL pain level.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document