Effect of eight weeks of low, moderate, and high-intensity TRX training on hot flashes, mood, fat percentage, and muscular endurance in postmenopausal women

2020 ◽  
Vol 55 (207) ◽  
pp. 97-103
Author(s):  
Shams Valeh ◽  
Hoseyn Fatolahi ◽  
Mohammad Ali Azarbayjani
2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
William I. Fisher ◽  
Aimee K. Johnson ◽  
Jim R. Sliwinski ◽  
Amelia Yu ◽  
Debra Barton ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Linda Denise Fernandes Moreira ◽  
Fernanda Cerveira A. O. Fronza ◽  
Rodrigo Nolasco dos Santos ◽  
Patrícia Lins Zach ◽  
Ilda S. Kunii ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 216 (4) ◽  
pp. 384.e1-384.e11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camilla M. Mandrup ◽  
Jon Egelund ◽  
Michael Nyberg ◽  
Martina H. Lundberg Slingsby ◽  
Caroline B. Andersen ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Jon Egelund ◽  
Peter G. Jørgensen ◽  
Camilla M. Mandrup ◽  
Thomas Fritz‐Hansen ◽  
Bente Stallknecht ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 258-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ebru Tarim ◽  
Tayfun Bagis ◽  
Esra Kilicdag ◽  
Serkan Erkanli ◽  
Erdogan Aslan ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Nivash Rugbeer ◽  
Demitri Constantinou ◽  
Georgia Torres

Background: High-intensity training is comprised of sprint interval training (SIT) and high-intensity interval training (HIIT). This study compared high-intensity training with moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) on cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and body fat percentage for overweight or obese persons. Methods: A systematic search of randomized controlled trials using the health science databases occurred up to April, 2020. Twenty-six studies were included for complete analysis. A total of 784 participations were analyzed. The unstandardized mean difference for each outcome measurement was extracted from the studies and pooled with the random effects model. Results: MICT was significantly better at improving CRF compared with SIT (mean difference = −0.92; 95% confidence interval, −1.63 to −0.21; P = .01; I2 = 10%). Furthermore, there was no significant difference between MICT versus HIIT on CRF (mean difference = −0.52; 95% confidence interval, −1.18 to 0.13; P = .12; I2 = 23%). There was no significant difference in body fat percentage between MICT versus HIIT and MICT versus SIT. Conclusions: MICT was significantly better at improving CRF than SIT in overweight or obese persons.


2020 ◽  
Vol 120 (7) ◽  
pp. 1711-1720
Author(s):  
Lasse Gliemann ◽  
Andrea Tamariz-Ellemann ◽  
Thomas Baasch-Skytte ◽  
Thomas S. Ehlers ◽  
Thomas P. Gunnarsson

Sports ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuri Feito ◽  
Pratik Patel ◽  
Andrea Sal Redondo ◽  
Katie Heinrich

High-intensity exercise has been found to positively influence glucose control, however, the effects of high-intensity functional training (HIFT) for overweight and obese sedentary adults without diabetes is unknown. The purpose of this study was to examine changes in body composition and glucose control from eight weeks of aerobic and resistance training (A-RT) compared to HIFT. Session time spent doing daily workouts was recorded for each group. Baseline and posttest measures included height, weight, waist circumference, dual X-ray absorptiometry (body fat percentage, fat mass, lean mass), and fasting blood glucose. Participants completing the intervention (78%, n = 9 per group) were 67% female, age = 26.8 ± 5.5 years, and had body mass index = 30.5 ± 2.9 kg/m2. Fasting blood glucose and 2-h oral glucose tolerance tests were used as primary outcome variables. On average, the HIFT group spent significantly less time completing workouts per day and week (ps < 0.001). No significant differences were found for body composition or glucose variables within- or between-groups. Even though our findings did not provide significant differences between groups, future research may utilize the effect sizes from our study to conduct fully-powered trials comparing HIFT with other more traditional training modalities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document