Clinical Survivorship of Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Hinged Knees and Tantalum Cones at Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (12) ◽  
pp. 3018-3022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hussein Abdelaziz ◽  
Rodrigo Jaramillo ◽  
Thorsten Gehrke ◽  
Malte Ohlmeier ◽  
Mustafa Citak
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jake von Hintze ◽  
Mika Niemeläinen ◽  
Harri Sintonen ◽  
Jyrki Nieminen ◽  
Antti Eskelinen

Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to determine the mid-term clinical, radiographic and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes and define the survival rate in patients who had undergone revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using the single rotating hinged knee (RHK) design. Methods Between January 2004 and December 2013, 125 revision TKAs were performed at our institution using the single RHK implant. We conducted both a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected outcome data of these patients and a prospective follow-up study of all 39 living patients (41 knees). The follow-up phase included an optional extra follow-up visit, PROM questionnaires, and plain radiographs. Results The ten-year Kaplan-Meier survival rate of the revision RHK knees was 81.7% (95% CI 71.9–91.6%) with re-revision for any reason as the endpoint. Overall, 15 knees (12% of the total) underwent re-revision surgery during the follow-up. The median follow-up was 6.2 years (range, 0–12.7 years) post-operatively for the baseline group. One mechanical hinge mechanism-related failure occurred without any history of trauma or infection. At the time of the final follow-up, the majority of patients evinced a fairly good clinical outcome measured with patient-reported outcome measures and none of the components were radiographically loose. Conclusion We found that in patients undergoing complex revision TKA, fairly good functional outcome and quality of life can be achieved using an RHK implant. Further, it seems that in this type of patient cohort, revision TKA using an RHK implant relieves pain more than it improves ability to function. The NexGen® RHK design can be regarded as a suitable option in complex revision TKA.


Author(s):  
John R. Steele ◽  
Sean P. Ryan ◽  
William A. Jiranek ◽  
Samuel S. Wellman ◽  
Michael P. Bolognesi ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (10) ◽  
pp. 2439-2443 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin M. Denehy ◽  
Sarag Abhari ◽  
Viktor E. Krebs ◽  
Carlos A. Higuera-Rueda ◽  
Linsen T. Samuel ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 990-993 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert L. Barrack ◽  
Gerard Engh ◽  
Cecil Rorabeck ◽  
Jaswin Sawhney ◽  
Michael Woolfrey

2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (11) ◽  
pp. 2187-2191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam A. Sassoon ◽  
Cody C. Wyles ◽  
German A. Norambuena Morales ◽  
Matthew T. Houdek ◽  
Robert T. Trousdale

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Li ◽  
Xinguang Wang ◽  
Hua Tian

Abstract Background: The reconstruction of massive bone defects is one of the main challenges in revision total knee arthroplasty (RTKA). Although several methods are available, each of them has its prominent shortcomings. The purpose of this study is to review the clinical outcomes of RTKA with massive proximal tibial bone defects using patient-customized three-dimensional (3D)-printed highly porous metaphyseal cones.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed seven RTKAs with Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) type III tibial defects using patient-customized 3D-printed highly porous metaphyseal cones, which have been performed at a single institution between 2016 and 2018. Results: The mean age at diagnosis of the patients was 68 years old (61-77). The mean length of follow-up was 25.3 months (19-36). At the latest follow-up, no aseptic loosening or prosthetic joint infection has been determined. The mean HSS increased from 49 (39-63) to 78 (70-83) (P<0.01); the mean WOMAC increased from 59 (46-73) to 26 (12-38) (P<0.01). All patients obtained the range of motion and mechanical alignment improvement postoperatively.Conclusion: The patient-customized 3D-printed metaphyseal cone could be a promising technique in addressing severe tibial defects in RTKA. Our study shows encouraging short-term clinical and radiological outcomes with no aseptic loosening, periprosthetic infection, or fracture. Nevertheless, further follow-up and the expansion of sample size are needed to demonstrate the advantage of this innovative technique fully.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document