Comparison of partial meniscectomy versus meniscus repair for bucket-handle lateral meniscus tears in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed knees

2004 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 581-585 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.Donald Shelbourne ◽  
Michael D Dersam
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Lateral Meniscus ◽  
Meniscus Repair ◽  
Partial Meniscectomy ◽  
Meniscus Tears ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Bucket Handle

scholarly journals Evaluation of functional outcome of bucket handle medial meniscus repair along with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 499
Author(s):  
Akshay Jain ◽  
Adhir Jain ◽  
Manjeet Singh ◽  
Prateek Pathak
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Medial Meniscus ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Meniscal Repair ◽  
Meniscus Repair ◽  
Meniscus Tears ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Bucket Handle

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Bucket-handle meniscus tears (BHMT) are often displaced and unstable and comprise nearly 10% of all meniscus tears and commonly affect the young male population. Displacement of the free segment can lead to significant pain and disability, necessitating reduction and surgical treatment. The aim of present prospective longitudinal cohort study was to evaluate the functional outcomes of bucket handle medial meniscus repair along with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction at 2 years follow up.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> Between January 2017 to December 2018, 30 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction along with bucket handle medial meniscus repair were included in the study. Meniscus repair was done using the all inside, outside in, inside out or hybrid techniques. All patients were evaluated clinically at pre op and at 2 year follow up using knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score and compared. Meniscal healing was assessed clinically using Barrett’s criteria.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> The study comprised 30 patients with a mean age of 27.47 years (range from 13 to 49 years) with 66.67% males. According to clinical examination and Barrett criteria’s the clinical failure rate was 6.67% (2 out of 30 patients) who underwent partial menisectomy later. We also compared functional outcomes of sedentary and active peoplesand also between meniscal repair of less than 3 cm and more than 3 cm’s. There was no statistically significant difference in the functional outcomes in both the groups; however range of motion was significantly higher in tear length 3 cm or less compared to more than 3 cm.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Meniscal repair should be aggressively considered in young pa­tients to enhance functional recovery and durability of the knee joint, if the meniscus is reparable.</p>

scholarly journals EFFECT OF SKELETAL MATURITY ON INCIDENCE OF ASSOCIATED MENISCAL AND CHONDRAL INJURIES IN ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT INJURED KNEES

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (7_suppl3) ◽  
pp. 2325967121S0010
Author(s):  
Brett Heldt ◽  
Elsayed Attia ◽  
Raymond Guo ◽  
Indranil Kushare ◽  
Theodore Shybut
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Medial Meniscus ◽  
Skeletal Maturity ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Meniscal Tear ◽  
Lateral Meniscus ◽  
Meniscus Tears ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Acute anterior cruciate ligament(ACL) rupture is associated with a significant incidence of concomitant meniscal and chondral injuries. However, to our knowledge, the incidence of these concomitant injuries in skeletally immature(SI) versus skeletally mature(SM) patients has not been directly compared. SI patients are a unique subset of ACL patients because surgical considerations are different, and subsequent re-tear rates are high. However, it is unclear if the rates and types of meniscal and chondral injuries differ. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare associated meniscal and chondral injury patterns between SI and SM patients under age 21, treated with ACL reconstruction for an acute ACL tear. We hypothesized that no significant differences would be seen. Methods: We performed a single-center retrospective review of primary ACL reconstructions performed from January 2012 to April 2020. Patients were stratified by skeletal maturity status based on a review of records and imaging. Demographic data was recorded, including age, sex, and BMI. Associated intra-articular meniscal injury, including laterality, location, configuration, and treatment were determined. Articular cartilage injury location, grade, and treatments were determined. Revision rates, non-ACL reoperation rates, and time to surgery were also compared between the two groups. Results: 785 SM and 208 SI patients met inclusion criteria. Mean BMI and mean age were significantly different between groups. Meniscal tear rates were significantly greater in SM versus SI patients in medial meniscus tears(P<.001), medial posterior horn tears(P=.001), medial longitudinal tears configuration(P=.007), lateral Radial configuration(P=.002), and lateral complex tears(P=.011). Medial repairs(P<.001) and lateral partial meniscectomies(P=.004) were more likely in the SM group. There was a significantly greater number of chondral injuries in the SM versus SI groups in the Lateral(p=.007) and medial compartments(P<.001). SM patients had a significantly increased number of outerbridge grade 1 and 2 in the Lateral(P<.001) and Medial Compartments(P=.013). ACL revisions(P=.019) and Non-ACL reoperations(P=.002) were significantly greater in the SI patients compared to SM. No other significant differences were noted. Conclusion: SM ACL injured patients have a significantly higher rate of medial meniscus tears and medial longitudinal configurations treated with repair, and a significantly higher rate of radial and/or complex lateral meniscus tears treated with partial meniscectomy compared to the SI group. We also found a significantly higher rate of both medial and lateral compartment chondral injuries, mainly grades 1 and 2, in SM compared to SI patients. Conversely, SI ACL reconstruction patients had higher revision and subsequent non-ACL surgery rates.

scholarly journals Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury with Medial and Lateral Bucket-Handle Meniscus Tears

2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (01) ◽  
pp. 021-024
Author(s):  
Joseph Fazalare ◽  
Jason Payne ◽  
Stephanie Stradley ◽  
Thomas Best ◽  
Joseph Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Ligament Injury ◽  
Meniscus Tears ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Bucket Handle

scholarly journals Concomitant injuries of anterior cruciate ligament and meniscus

2016 ◽  
Vol 69 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 217-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vladimir Ristic ◽  
Mirsad Maljanovic ◽  
Ivan Mihajlov ◽  
Vukadin Milankov ◽  
Vladimir Harhaji
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Medial Meniscus ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Lateral Meniscus ◽  
Meniscal Injury ◽  
Concomitant Injuries ◽  
Male Patients ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Contact Mechanism ◽  
Bucket Handle

Introduction. The aim of this study was to determine the correlation between meniscal injuries with injuries of the anterior cruciate ligament, as well as risk factors for those associated injuries. Material and Methods. This study included 496 operated patients. Almost half of patients with meniscal injury were between the ages of 21 and 30 years. Results. Meniscal injuries were diagnosed in 187 patients (38%). These patients were significantly older than the patients without meniscal injury. Meniscal injuries were significantly more frequent in patients who played sports recreationally than in professional athletes. The patients with meniscal injury underwent surgery almost four months later than the patients with preserved menisci. Meniscal injuries occurred significantly more frequently by non - contact mechanism, as a result of landing and sudden changes of direction and rhythm of running. Conclusion. Male patients hurt the medial meniscus more often, ?bucket handle? type of lesion being much more frequent than on the lateral meniscus. The increase of body mass index is exactly proportional to the increase in the incidence of meniscal injuries.

scholarly journals Simultaneous Bicompartmental Bucket Handle Injury Associated With a Chronic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture: Case Report and Literature Review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Buljubasich ◽  
Agustin Maria Garcia-Mansilla ◽  
Mariano Garcia Bistolfi ◽  
Juan Astoul ◽  
Matias Costa Paz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Partial Meniscectomy ◽  
Ligament Injury ◽  
Mri Findings ◽  
Common Procedure ◽  
High Association ◽  
One Stage ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Bucket Handle

Abstract Introduction: Simultaneously locked bucket handle injury of both menisci is a rare phenomenon. Clinically the knee is locked in flexion with pain in both joint lines. It has a high association rate with instability generated by an anterior cruciate ligament injury (ACL). There are a few reports regarding this association or without any associated injury treated either in one-stage or two-stage surgery.Objetive: To report a patient with a simultaneous bicompartmental locked bucket handle, highlighting the challenges of the surgical technique and a literature review.Case Report: We present the case of a 42-year-old male with a simultaneous bicompartmental locked bucket handle injury associated with chronic ACL deficiency. Treated in one stage by bilateral partial meniscectomy and ACL reconstruction. We discuss the MRI findings, treatment options and performed an up-to date review.Conclusions: Although partial meniscectomy is a common procedure, when performed in an unusual patient and in the absence of therapeutic guidelines or consensus when dealing with this association, an appropriate preoperative plan should be followed. This case provides a perioperative approach focused on a review of the most recent literature.

Comparison of Cases with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Accompanied by Simultaneous Medial Meniscus Bucket Handle Tear Repair and Isolated Medial Meniscus Bucket Handle Tear Repair

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yavuz Akalın ◽  
Özgür Avcı ◽  
Savaş İ. İnce ◽  
Nazan Çevik ◽  
İsmail G. Şahin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Medial Meniscus ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Meniscus Tears ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Bucket Handle Tear ◽  
Bucket Handle

AbstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate the success of the all-inside repair technique for medial bucket-handle meniscus tear (BHMT) and the factors affecting healing. A total of 36 patients with BHMT who were operated between 2012 and 2018 and completed final follow-up examinations were included in the study. Functional evaluation was made with the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, and Tegner score. Healing was evaluated on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) slices. The patients were evaluated with respect to the effect on healing of factors such as demographic data, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, anterior cruciate ligament tear reconstruction (ACLTR) applied at the same time as BHMT repair, and the tear being chronic or acute. The mean age of the patients was 28.6 ± 8.6 years (range,18–46 years), the mean follow-up period was 25.8 ± 13.9 months (range, 13–59 months), and BMI was mean 25.6 ± 3.5 kg/m2 (range, 20.1–30.5 kg/m2). The meniscus tears were acute in 16 (44.4%) patients and chronic in 20 (55.6%). ACLTR was applied together with BHMT repair in 25 patients. The hybrid technique, as the outside-in technique in addition to the all-inside technique, was applied to 12 (33.3%) patients, where there was seen to be extension to the anterior horn. The failure rate was determined as 27.8% according to the postoperative MRI evaluation and the Barrett criteria. No positive or negative statistically significant effect on healing was determined of chronic BHMT or of simultaneous application of ACLTR (p = 1.00 and 0.457, respectively). Cigarette smoking and high BMI were determined to have a statistically significant negative effect on healing (p = 0.026 and 0.007, respectively). In conclusion, it can be seen that the success of the all-inside technique for BHMT remains controversial. Due to the features of the application, it can be used in meniscus tears of the posterior horn only. In the current study, with the success rate of 72.2% of the all-inside technique in meniscus body tears, it was seen that a high success rate could not be achieved.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document