Development and validation of a technoeconomic analysis tool for early-stage evaluation of bio-based chemical production processes

2013 ◽  
Vol 150 ◽  
pp. 486-495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua T. Claypool ◽  
D. Raj Raman
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Buus ◽  
Zsolt Szijgyarto ◽  
Eugene F. Schuster ◽  
Hui Xiao ◽  
Ben P. Haynes ◽  
...  

AbstractMulti-gene prognostic signatures including the Oncotype® DX Recurrence Score (RS), EndoPredict® (EP) and Prosigna® (Risk Of Recurrence, ROR) are widely used to predict the likelihood of distant recurrence in patients with oestrogen-receptor-positive (ER+), HER2-negative breast cancer. Here, we describe the development and validation of methods to recapitulate RS, EP and ROR scores from NanoString expression data. RNA was available from 107 tumours from postmenopausal women with early-stage, ER+, HER2− breast cancer from the translational Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination study (TransATAC) where previously these signatures had been assessed with commercial methodology. Gene expression was measured using NanoString nCounter. For RS and EP, conversion factors to adjust for cross-platform variation were estimated using linear regression. For ROR, the steps to perform subgroup-specific normalisation of the gene expression data and calibration factors to calculate the 46-gene ROR score were assessed and verified. Training with bootstrapping (n = 59) was followed by validation (n = 48) using adjusted, research use only (RUO) NanoString-based algorithms. In the validation set, there was excellent concordance between the RUO scores and their commercial counterparts (rc(RS) = 0.96, 95% CI 0.93–0.97 with level of agreement (LoA) of −7.69 to 8.12; rc(EP) = 0.97, 95% CI 0.96–0.98 with LoA of −0.64 to 1.26 and rc(ROR) = 0.97 (95% CI 0.94–0.98) with LoA of −8.65 to 10.54). There was also a strong agreement in risk stratification: (RS: κ = 0.86, p < 0.0001; EP: κ = 0.87, p < 0.0001; ROR: κ = 0.92, p < 0.001). In conclusion, the calibrated algorithms recapitulate the commercial RS and EP scores on individual biopsies and ROR scores on samples based on subgroup-centreing method using NanoString expression data.


2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 1207-1213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Watcharin Chirdchim ◽  
Preecha Wanichsetakul ◽  
Phichayut Phinyo ◽  
Jayanton Patumanond ◽  
Komsun Suwannarurk ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 139 ◽  
pp. 106841 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geert H. van Kollenburg ◽  
Jacoline van Es ◽  
Jan Gerretzen ◽  
Heleen Lanters ◽  
Roel Bouman ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naomi Findlay ◽  
Shane E. Dempsey ◽  
Helen M. Warren-Forward

AbstractObjective:Freeform reflective writing is one way that radiation therapists can document their development. Barriers to this form of writing include the fact that some radiation therapists do not know what to write or how to begin this writing process. This paper outlines the development and validation of guided inventories called the Newcastle Reflective Inventories and the validation of the Newcastle Reflective Analysis Tool as an effective tool for assessing short-form guided reflective writing.Method:The Newcastle Reflective Inventories consist of a series of questions that guides the user through the reflective writing process. Validation of the Newcastle Reflective Inventories involved comparing the evidence of reflection in 14 freeform journals to that of 14 inventories completed on the same topic. Validation of the Newcastle Reflective Analysis Tool included the assessment of 30 Newcastle Reflective Inventories.Results:There was a highly statistically significant difference (p< 0.001) in the high levels of reflection evident in the inventories when compared to the lower levels of reflection in the freeform journals. Good levels of agreement were achieved between the coders.Discussion:These results show that the Newcastle Reflective Inventories are effective tools in promoting reflective writing when compared with freeform journaling.


atp magazin ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 58 ◽  
pp. 64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Kalliski ◽  
Benedikt Beisheim ◽  
Daniel Krahè ◽  
Udo Enste ◽  
Stefan Krämer ◽  
...  

Operational decisions in the day-to-day business of chemical production processes can have a significant impact on the energy and material efficiency. We propose to use real-time resource efficiency indicators (REI) to accurately monitor the energy and material efficiency in real-time and subsequently to use these in decision support for the operating staff. To guide industrial users during the development of REIs, a Namur ad-hoc working group (AK) Resource Efficiency Indicators for the operational use was set up to prepare a Namur Recommendation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document