Maxillary stability in patients with skeletal class III malocclusion treated by bimaxillary orthognathic surgery: comparison of mandible-first and maxilla-first approaches in a randomized controlled study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Hamdy Mahmoud ◽  
Tarek Ismail Elfaramawi ◽  
Kareem Samir El-Tabarany ◽  
Niveen Abdellatif Askar
Keyword(s):  
Orthognathic Surgery ◽  
Randomized Controlled Study ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Class Iii Malocclusion ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery

scholarly journals A Comparative Assessment of Orthodontic Treatment Outcomes of Mild Skeletal Class III Malocclusion Between Facemask and Facemask in Combination with a Miniscrew For Anchorage in Growing Patients: A Single-center, Prospective Randomized Controlled trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 90 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahiro Seiryu ◽  
Hiroto Ida ◽  
Atsushi Mayama ◽  
Satoshi Sasaki ◽  
Shutaro Sasaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Outcomes ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Class Iii Malocclusion ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Group 12 ◽  
Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Group A ◽  
Negative Side Effects

ABSTRACT Objectives To investigate the hypothesis that there is difference in the treatment outcomes of milder skeletal Class III malocclusion between facemask and facemask in combination with a miniscrew in growing patients. Materials and Methods Patients were randomly divided into two groups. In one group, the patients were treated with facemask therapy (FM group: 12 males, eight females, average age: 10 years, 5 months ± 1 year, 8 months). In the other group, patients were treated with facemask therapy along with a miniscrew (FM+MS group: 12 males, seven females, average age: 11 years, 1 month ± 1 year, 3 months). A lingual arch with hooks was fixed to the maxillary arch in both groups and a protractive force of 500 g was applied from the facemask to the hooks. The patients were instructed to use the facemask for 12 hours per day. In the FM+MS group, a miniscrew was inserted into the palate and fixed to the lingual arch. Results Mobility and loosening of the miniscrew were not observed during treatment. Lateral cephalometric analysis showed that SNA, SN-ANS, and ANB values were significantly increased in the FM+MS group compared with those for the FM group (SNA, 1.1° SN-ANS, 1.3° ANB, 0.8°). Increase in proclination of maxillary incisors was significantly greater in the FM group than in the FM+MS group (U1-SN, 5.0°). Conclusions During treatment of milder skeletal Class III malocclusion, facemask therapy along with a miniscrew exhibits fewer negative side effects and delivers orthopedic forces more efficiently to the maxillary complex than facemask therapy alone.

scholarly journals Orthodontic camouflage of skeletal Class III malocclusion with miniplate: a case report

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 89-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcel Marchiori Farret ◽  
Milton M. Benitez Farret ◽  
Alessandro Marchiori Farret
Keyword(s):  
Orthognathic Surgery ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Class Iii Malocclusion ◽  
Lower Lip ◽  
Facial Profile ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Mandibular Teeth ◽  
One Year ◽  
Angle Class Iii Malocclusion

ABSTRACT Introduction: Skeletal Class III malocclusion is often referred for orthodontic treatment combined with orthognathic surgery. However, with the aid of miniplates, some moderate discrepancies become feasible to be treated without surgery. Objective: To report the case of a 24-year-old man with severe skeletal Angle Class III malocclusion with anterior crossbite and a consequent concave facial profile. Methods: The patient refused to undergo orthognathic surgery; therefore, orthodontic camouflage treatment with the aid of miniplates placed on the mandibular arch was proposed. Results: After 18 months of treatment, a Class I molar and canine relationship was achieved, while anterior crossbite was corrected by retraction of mandibular teeth. The consequent decrease in lower lip fullness and increased exposure of maxillary incisors at smiling resulted in a remarkable improvement of patient's facial profile, in addition to an esthetically pleasing smile, respectively. One year later, follow-up revealed good stability of results.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document