The impact of ABO blood group on COVID-19 infection risk and mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective: This meta-analysis comprehensively evaluated the association between ABO blood group and the risk of preeclampsia (PE).Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.Data sources: PubMed, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect databases from their inception to September 23, 2020.Methods: Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained through random-effects and fixed-effects models according to heterogeneity. Meta-regression analysis was applied to explore the source of heterogeneity. We conducted a subgroup analysis by the publication year, study design, state, and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) score. In addition, we calculated the rate of each ABO blood group in PE by total pooled effects.Results: A total of 12 articles with 714,153 patients were included in our analysis. Compared with people without PE (control group), the O blood group presented a lower risk of PE (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.93–0.97). The AB (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.12–1.91) blood group presented a higher risk. However, the total pooled OR and 95% CI for the A (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.90–1.16) and B (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.98–1.05) blood groups were not significant. The funnel plot and linear regression equation showed that there was no publication bias for the O, A, or B blood groups (all P > 0.05). However, the funnel plot and linear regression equation for the AB blood group were obviously asymmetric (P < 0.05), and the publication bias persisted even after the trim-and-fill method was applied (P < 0.05). Multivariable meta-regression analysis did not find a specific source of heterogeneity. The A blood group showed an association with early-onset PE (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.33–0.83), and the other blood groups showed no significant differences. In PE, the rates of the O, A, B, and AB blood groups decreased gradually (0.39, 0.33, 0.19, 0.07).Conclusion: These findings suggest that pregnant women with AB blood group are more likely to develop PE, and more attention should be paid to AB blood group whose blood pressure is high but not sufficient to diagnose PE.Systematic Review Registration: Prospero CRD42021227930.

Download Full-text

ABO blood group-associated susceptibility to norovirus infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Infection Genetics and Evolution ◽

10.1016/j.meegid.2020.104245 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 81 ◽

pp. 104245 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Yingyin Liao ◽

Liang Xue ◽

Junshan Gao ◽

Aiwu Wu ◽

Xiaoxia Kou

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Blood Group ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Abo Blood Group

Download Full-text

The risk of infections in adult patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: systematic review and meta-analysis

Rheumatology ◽

10.1093/rheumatology/keaa478 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 60 (1) ◽

pp. 60-72 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

José María Pego-Reigosa ◽

Lindsay Nicholson ◽

Nick Pooley ◽

Sue Langham ◽

Nina Embleton ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Herpes Zoster ◽

General Population ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Severe Infection ◽

Infection Risk ◽

Sensitivity Analyses ◽

Healthy Controls ◽

Increased Risk ◽

The Impact

Abstract Objectives We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the magnitude of infection risk in patients with SLE and evaluate the effect of general and SLE-related factors on infection risk. Methods We searched MEDLINE and Embase from inception to July 2018, screening for observational studies that evaluated infection risk in patients with SLE compared with the general population/healthy controls. Outcomes of interest included overall severe infection, herpes zoster infection/reactivation, opportunistic infections, pneumonia and tuberculosis. Random-effects models were used to calculate pooled risk ratios (RRs) for each type of infection. Sensitivity analysis assessed the impact of removing studies with high risk of bias. Results Eleven retrospective or prospective cohort studies were included in the meta-analysis: overall severe infection (n = 4), pneumonia (n = 6), tuberculosis (n = 3) and herpes zoster (n = 2). Pooled RRs for overall severe infection significantly increased for patients with SLE compared with the general population/healthy controls [RR 2.96 (95% CI 1.28, 6.83)]. Pooled RRs for pneumonia, herpes zoster and tuberculosis showed significantly increased risk compared with the general population/healthy controls [RR 2.58 (1.80, 3.70), 2.50 (2.36, 2.65) and 6.11 (3.61, 10.33), respectively]. Heterogeneity and evidence of publication bias were present for all analyses, except herpes zoster. Sensitivity analyses confirmed robustness of the results. Conclusion Patients with SLE have significantly higher risk of infection compared with the general population/healthy controls. Efforts to strengthen strategies aimed at preventing infections in SLE are needed. Protocol registration PROSPERO number: CRD42018109425.

Download Full-text

ABO blood group and ovarian reserve: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Oncotarget ◽

10.18632/oncotarget.15759 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 8 (15) ◽

pp. 25628-25636 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Jie Deng ◽

Mengmeng Jia ◽

Xiaolin Cheng ◽

Zhen Yan ◽

Dongmei Fan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Blood Group ◽

Ovarian Reserve ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Abo Blood Group

Download Full-text

ABO blood groups and hepatitis B virus infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMJ Open ◽

10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034114 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 10 (1) ◽

pp. e034114 ◽

Cited By ~ 11

Author(s):

Wenzhan Jing ◽

Siyu Zhao ◽

Jue Liu ◽

Min Liu

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Hepatitis B Virus ◽

Blood Group ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Blood Groups ◽

Hbv Infection ◽

Abo Blood Group ◽

Abo Blood Groups ◽

B Virus ◽

Group B

ObjectiveHepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a major public health problem worldwide. Several studies have reported that ABO blood groups may be associated with HBV infection. However, its association is still controversial. We performed a meta-analysis to investigate whether ABO blood groups were associated with HBV infection.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.Data sourcesRelevant studies available before 1 December 2019 were identified by searching PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, ScienceDirect and the Cochrane Library.Eligibility criteriaAll cross-sectional or cohort studies from which the data of ABO blood group distribution and HBV infection could be extracted.Data extraction and synthesisStudies were identified and extracted by two reviewers independently. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% CIs were pooled by random-effect models to quantify this association.ResultsThirty-eight eligible articles including 241 868 HBV-infected subjects and 6 487 481 uninfected subjects were included. Overall, the risk of HBV infection had decreased by 8% in subjects with blood group B when compared with non-B blood group (RR=0.92, 95% CI 0.86 to 0.98). In the subgroup analyses, the inverse relationship between blood group B and HBV infection remained stable in higher endemic areas (HBV prevalence ≥5%), Asian people, larger sample size studies (≥2000), general population and blood donors, lower middle income group and studies published before the year 2010. Additionally, subjects with blood group O had a 12% increased risk of HBV infection (RR=1.12, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.24) in higher endemic areas. In the sensitivity analysis, the pooled risk estimates of blood group B and HBV infection were still stable.ConclusionsOur data suggested that the blood group B was associated with a lower risk of HBV infection. More research is needed to clarify the precise role of the ABO blood group in HBV infection to address the global question of HBV infection.

Download Full-text

Prevalence of rhesus D-negative blood type and the challenges of rhesus D immunoprophylaxis among obstetric population in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Maternal Health Neonatology and Perinatology ◽

10.1186/s40748-021-00129-3 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 7 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Asteray Assmie Ayenew

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Pregnant Women ◽

Blood Group ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Blood Groups ◽

Blood Type ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Abo Blood Group ◽

Hemolytic Disease ◽

Group Distribution

Abstract Background Transplacental or fetomaternal hemorrhage (FMH) may occur during pregnancy or at delivery and lead to immunization to the D antigen if the mother is Rh-negative and the baby is Rh-positive. This can result in hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) in subsequent D-positive pregnancies. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to estimate distribution of ABO and Rh (D) blood groups among pregnant women in Ethiopia. Method We searched PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, HINARI, AFRO Library Databases, and African Online Journal databases for all available studies using the following keywords: “High rhesus (Rh(D)) negative frequency”, “ABO blood group distribution”, “haemolytic disease of the newborn (HDN)”, “rh isoimmunization”, “anti-RhD immunoglobulin”, “D-negative pregnancies”, “Frequency”, “ABO and Rh blood group distribution”, “feto-maternal hemorrhage”, “rhesus D negative pregnant mothers”, “kleihauer-betke test (KBT)”, “Neonatal Hyperbilirubinemia”, “non-sensitized RhD-negative pregnant women”, “antenatal anti-D immunoglobulin prophylaxis”, “Hemolytic disease of the newborn (alloimmunization), Ethiopia. The search string was developed using “AND” and “OR” Boolean operators. All published and unpublished observational studies reporting the distribution of ABO and Rh (D) blood groups among pregnant women in Ethiopia were included. The study participants were all pregnant women in Ethiopia, and the main outcome measure of this systematic review and meta-analysis was Rhesus D-negative blood type and ABO blood group distribution among pregnant women in Ethiopia. The data was extracted by the author (AAA) by using a standardized JBI data extraction format. Microsoft Excel (2016), and Stata version 11.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas, USA) software were used for data entry and analysis, respectively. The random effect model was used for estimating the pooled effects, and the publication bias was assessed by visual inspection of the funnel plots and objectively by using the Egger’s test (i.e. p < 0.05). Results One hundred thirty-two articles were identified through electronic database searching. Of which, 34 were excluded due to duplication, 65 through review of titles and abstracts, and 22 full-text articles were excluded for not reporting the outcome variable and other reasons. Finally, 7 were included to estimate the distribution of ABO and Rh (D) blood groups among pregnant women in Ethiopia. The pooled distribution of Rh-negative blood group among pregnant women in Ethiopia was 10.8% (95%CI: 7.53–14.07, I2 = 85%, p < 0.001). In the ABO system, type O was the most prevalent 39.9% (37.51–42.38), followed by A (30.59% (26.00–35.18)), B (23.04% (20.03–26.05)), and AB the least (4.82%(3.17–6.47)), in the pattern O > A > B > AB. Conclusion The pooled distribution of Rh-negative blood group among pregnant women in Ethiopia was high. Rh alloimmunization remains a major factor responsible for perinatal morbidity in Ethiopia and may result in the compromise of the woman’s obstetric care due to the unaffordability of anti-D immunoglobulin. There is the urgent need for the implementation of universal access to anti-D immunoglobulin for the Rh-negative pregnant population in Ethiopia.

Download Full-text