Medium-term oncological and functional outcomes of hemi-gland brachytherapy using iodine-125 seeds for intermediate-risk unilateral prostate cancer

47 Background: To compare 10-year treatment outcomes of RP (radical prostatectomy) vs EBRT (external beam radiation therapy) vs BT (brachytherapy) for patients with IRPC (intermediate risk prostate cancer). Methods: A retrospective analysis using propensity score matching was performed on 1,503 IRPC patients who underwent treatment from 2004 to 2007. 819 underwent RP, 574 underwent EBRT to a median dose of 75.3 Gray, and 110 underwent BT using iodine-125. Biochemical failure was defined by the AUA (American Urological Association) definition of PSA (prostate specific antigen) failure for RP patients, and the ASTRO-Phoenix definition (American Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology) for the EBRT and BT patients. Results: Median follow up was 10 years for RP, 9.6 for EBRT, and 9.8 for BT (range 1-13.4 years). With RP 76.3% had Gleason score 7 vs 72.8% for EBRT vs 57.3% for BT, p = 0.0001. Median initial PSA was 7.4 for RP, 9.4 for EBRT, and 8.3 for BT, p < 0.0001. Neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy was given in 58.9% of EBRT patients vs 12.7% of BT vs 0.6% for RP, p < 0.0001. Only 14% of BT received supplemental external radiation. The 10-year FFBF (freedom from biochemical failure) was 82.0% for BT vs 58.0% for RP vs 58.8% for EBRT, p < 0.0001. Subset analysis of unfavorable IRPC patients showed a 10 year FFBF of 81.6% for BT vs 55.8% for RP vs 51.0% for EBRT, p < 0.0001. The 10-year freedom from salvage therapy was 89.5% for BT vs 64.0% for RP vs 73.4% for EBRT, p < 0.0001. There were no significant differences in distant metastases-free survival, prostate cancer-specific survival, or overall survival after adjusting for age. Multivariate analysis between pairwise groups with BT balanced by stabilized inverse probability of treatment weights showed that BT remained an independent predictor for improved FFBF, p = 0.049 for BT vs EBRT, and p < 0.0001 for BT vs RP. Conclusions: Brachytherapy using iodine-125 is a reasonable treatment option for IRPC patients. Although BT showed improved FFBF after propensity score matching, this did not impact overall survival.

Download Full-text

Outcomes following iodine-125 brachytherapy in patients with Gleason 7, intermediate risk prostate cancer: A population-based cohort study

Radiotherapy and Oncology ◽

10.1016/j.radonc.2012.01.006 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 103 (2) ◽

pp. 228-232 ◽

Cited By ~ 21

Author(s):

Christopher Herbert ◽

W. James Morris ◽

Mira Keyes ◽

Jeremy Hamm ◽

Vincent Lapointe ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Prostate Cancer ◽

Cohort Study ◽

Population Based ◽

Intermediate Risk ◽

Risk Prostate Cancer ◽

Iodine 125

Download Full-text

ASCENDE-RT*: A multicenter, randomized trial of dose-escalated external beam radiation therapy (EBRT-B) versus low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-B) for men with unfavorable-risk localized prostate cancer.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2015.33.7_suppl.3 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 33 (7_suppl) ◽

pp. 3-3 ◽

Cited By ~ 36

Author(s):

W. James Morris ◽

Scott Tyldesley ◽

Howard H Pai ◽

Ross Halperin ◽

Michael R. McKenzie ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Prostate Cancer ◽

Radiation Therapy ◽

Randomized Trial ◽

Cox Model ◽

External Beam Radiation ◽

Intermediate Risk ◽

Peripheral Dose ◽

Beam Radiation ◽

Threshold Time ◽

Iodine 125

3 Background: This trial compared the efficacy of DE-EBRT and LDR-B for National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) high and intermediate-risk disease. Methods: A planned sample size of 400 patients were randomized to one of two treatment arms and stratified by risk group. Both arms received 12 months of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist plus a non-steroidal anti-androgen for at least 1 month. After 8 months of neo-adjuvant ADT, both arms received whole pelvis EBRT (46Gy/23#). Patients assigned to DE-EBRT (standard arm) then received a conformal EBRT boost (32Gy/16#). Patients assigned to LDR-B (experimental arm) received an Iodine-125 LDR boost prescribed to a minimum peripheral dose of 115Gy. The primary endpoint was relapse free survival (RFS) defined by biochemical criteria using the nadir+2 ng/mL threshold. Time zero was the date of the first LHRH injection. Results: Between Dec 2002 and Sep 2011, 276 high-risk and 122 intermediate-risk patients were accrued at 6 cancer treatment centers. 200 men were assigned to DE-EBRT and 198 to LDR-B. The treatment arms were well balanced in terms of age and known prognostic factors. Median follow up (FU) is 6.5 years; 65 men have >9 years FU. There were 12 major protocol violations in each arm. By intent-to-treat analysis, the 3-, 5-, 7-, and 9-year Kaplan-Meier RFS estimates are 94% vs 94%, 77% vs 89%, 71% vs 86%, and 63% vs 83% for DE-EBRT and LDR-B respectively (hazard ratio = 0.473; 95% CI 0.292 – 0.765; P = 0.0022). Randomization (p<0.001), percent positive cores (p=0.005), initial PSA (p=0.006) and clinical T-stage (p=0.013) were predictive of RFS in a multivariable Cox model. The median PSA at latest FU for non-relapsing patients assigned to LDR-B is 0.02 vs 0.24 ng/mL for DE-EBRT. Conclusions: In a randomized trial, an Iodine-125 LDR boost was much more effective than an EBRT boost in rendering unfavorable-risk prostate cancer patients biochemically disease free. *ASCENDE-RT- Androgen Suppression Combined with Elective Nodal and Dose Escalated Radiation Therapy is an NCI registered trial (NCT00175396). Clinical trial information: NCT00175396.

Download Full-text