High-intensity interval training versus continuous training on physiological and metabolic variables in prediabetes and type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 137 ◽  
pp. 149-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angélica Trevisan De Nardi ◽  
Tainara Tolves ◽  
Thatiane Larissa Lenzi ◽  
Luis Ulisses Signori ◽  
Antônio Marcos Vargas da Silva
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Interval Training ◽  
High Intensity Interval Training ◽  
Continuous Training ◽  
Metabolic Variables ◽  
High Intensity Interval

scholarly journals Anthropometric, Cardiopulmonary and Metabolic Benefits of the High-Intensity Interval Training Versus Moderate, Low-Intensity or Control for Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (22) ◽  
pp. 4524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lora-Pozo ◽  
Lucena-Anton ◽  
Salazar ◽  
Galán-Mercant ◽  
Moral-Munoz
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Interval Training ◽  
High Intensity Interval Training ◽  
High Intensity Interval ◽  
Intensity Training

Abstract: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of high-intensity interval training compared with no intervention and other types of training interventions for people with Type 2 Diabetes. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that used high-interval intensity training to improve anthropometric, cardiopulmonary and metabolic conditions were conducted. The search was performed during October–December 2017 using the databases PubMed, Web of Science and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro). The methodological quality of the studies was evaluated using the PEDro scale. A total of 10 articles were included in this meta-analysis. After statistical analysis, favorable results were obtained for high-Intensity Interval Training compared with control (non-intervention): [Weight: Standardized mean difference (SMD) = −2.09; confidence interval (CI) 95%: (−3.41; −0.78); body-mass index: SMD = −3.73; CI 95%: (−5.53; −1.93); systolic blood pressure: SMD = −4.55; CI 95%: (−8.44; −0.65); VO2max: SMD = 12.20; CI 95%: (0.26; 24.14); HbA1c: SMD = −3.72; CI 95%: (−7.34; −0.10)], moderate intensity continuous training: [body-mass index: SMD = −0.41; CI 95%: (−0.80; −0.03); VO2max: SMD = 1.91; CI 95%: (0.18; 3.64)], and low intensity training: [Weight: SMD = −2.06; CI 95%: (−2.80; −1.31); body-mass index: SMD = −3.04; CI 95%: (−5.16; −0.92); systolic blood pressure: SMD = −2.17; CI 95%: (−3.93; −0.41); HbA1c: SMD = −1.58; CI 95%: (−1.84; −1.33)]. The results show that high-intensity interval training can be a useful strategy in order to improve anthropometric, cardiopulmonary and metabolic parameters in people with Type 2 diabetes. Despite this, it could be essential to clarify and unify criteria in the intervention protocols, being necessary new lines of research.

Effect of high-intensity interval training protocols on VO2max and HbA1c level in people with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2022 ◽  
Vol 65 (5) ◽  
pp. 101586
Author(s):  
Mariana Brondani de Mello ◽  
Natiele Camponogara Righi ◽  
Felipe Barreto Schuch ◽  
Luis Ulisses Signori ◽  
Antônio Marcos Vargas da Silva
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Hba1c Level ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Interval Training ◽  
High Intensity Interval Training ◽  
High Intensity Interval ◽  
Training Protocols

553-P: Differential Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training on Somatosensory and Autonomic Nerve Function in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

Diabetes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 553-P
Author(s):  
GIDON J. BÖNHOF ◽  
ALEXANDER STROM ◽  
MARIA APOSTOLOPOULOU ◽  
DOMINIK PESTA ◽  
MICHAEL RODEN ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Interval Training ◽  
Autonomic Nerve ◽  
Nerve Function ◽  
High Intensity Interval Training ◽  
Differential Effects ◽  
Autonomic Nerve Function ◽  
High Intensity Interval
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document