Comparison of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction and laparoscopic total gastrectomy in terms of nutritional status or quality of life in early gastric cancer patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (12) ◽  
pp. 1963-1970 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji Yeon Park ◽  
Ki Bum Park ◽  
Oh Kyoung Kwon ◽  
Wansik Yu
BMC Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuo-meng Xiao ◽  
Ping Zhao ◽  
Zhi Ding ◽  
Rui Xu ◽  
Chao Yang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction (DTR) has been used for upper third gastric cancer as a function-preserving procedure. However, the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy (LPG) with DTR remain uncertain. This study compared open proximal gastrectomy (OPG) with DTR and LPG with DTR for proximal gastric cancer. Methods Sixty-four patients who had undergone OPG with DTR and forty-six patients who had undergone LPG with DTR were enrolled in this case–control study. The clinical characteristics, surgical outcomes and postoperative nutrition index were analysed retrospectively. Results The operation time was significantly longer in the LGP group than in the OPG group (258.3 min vs 205.8 min; p = 0.00). However, the time to first flatus and postoperative hospital stay were shorter in the LPG group [4.0 days vs 3.5 days (p = 0.00) and 10.6 days vs 9.2 days (p = 0.001), respectively]. No significant difference was found between the two groups in the number of retrieved lymph nodes, complications or reflux oesophagitis. The nutrition status was assessed using the haemoglobin, albumin, prealbumin and weight levels from pre-operation to six months after surgery. No significant difference was found between the groups. Conclusion LPG with DTR can be safely performed for proximal gastric cancer patients by experienced surgeons.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bang Wool Eom ◽  
Ji Yeon Park ◽  
Ki Bum Park ◽  
Hong Man Yoon ◽  
Oh Kyoung Kwon ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose: This study aims to compare the nutritional outcomes and quality of life between patients who underwent esophagogastrostomy (EG) and those who underwent the double-tract reconstruction (DTR) after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the prospectively established database of 45 patients who underwent EG with anti-reflux procedure and 58 patients who underwent the DTR after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy between December 2013 and June 2017. Then, we compared the baseline characteristics, clinical outcomes, postoperative nutritional parameters, and quality of life (QOL) using EORTC QLQ STO-22 between the EG and DTR groups. Results: In the postoperative 1-year endoscopic findings, the incidence of esophageal reflux was higher in the EG group (17.8% vs. 3.4%, p=0.041) and there was no significant difference in anastomotic stricture. Nutritional status was assessed via body mass index, serum albumin, protein, hemoglobin, and ferritin; we found no significant differences. The incidences of iron deficiency anemia and vitamin B12 deficiency also showed no significant difference between the two groups. With regards to the quality of life, the difference values between preoperative and postoperative 1-year were evaluated; there was no significant difference between the EG with anti-reflux procedure and DTR groups. Conclusions: EG had higher incidence of esophageal reflux and similar nutritional outcomes and QOL compared with the double-tract reconstruction after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy. Additional large-scale research is needed to evaluate the long-term functional outcomes of EG and the double-tract reconstruction.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 24-24
Author(s):  
Young-Il Kim ◽  
Young Ae Kim ◽  
Chan Gyoo Kim ◽  
Keun Won Ryu ◽  
Young Woo Kim ◽  
...  

24 Background: The aim of this study was to compare the serial changes of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) after Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) with those after surgery in patients with early gastric cancer (EGC). Methods: Gastric cancer patients were prospectively enrolled from 2004 through 2007. HRQOLs of 161 EGC patients were prospectively assessed by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC-QLQ-C30) and the stomach cancer-specific module EORTC-QLQ-STO22 at the baseline, 1, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after treatments. Analysis was done using the generalized linear model and paired- ttests. Results: Of 161 patients, 48 (29.8%) underwent ESD (ESD group) and 113 (70.2%) underwent surgery (surgery group). The median age of stomach cancer patients was 57 years. Surgery group had poorer scores compared with those of ESD group in the most HRQOL factors one month after treatments ( P< 0.05), except for emotional and cognitive functioning, financial problems, anxiety, and hair loss. However, most of the functional and symptom scales after surgery subsequently improved and became insignificant until 24 months of follow up. Only 3 parameters including physical functioning, diarrhea and body image in ESD group still remained better until 24 months after treatment ( P< 0.05). Conclusions: Because poorer HRQOLs after surgery in the early post-treatment periods become insignificant during long-term follow-up, surgical treatment should not be discouraged in EGC treatment solely based on the QOL aspects.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document