scholarly journals Exposure-based assessment and economic valuation of adverse birth outcomes and cancer risk due to nitrate in United States drinking water.

2019 ◽  
Vol 176 ◽  
pp. 108442 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexis Temkin ◽  
Sydney Evans ◽  
Tatiana Manidis ◽  
Chris Campbell ◽  
Olga V. Naidenko
Author(s):  
Uloma Igara Uche ◽  
Sydney Evans ◽  
Soren Rundquist ◽  
Chris Campbell ◽  
Olga V. Naidenko

Research studies analyzing the geospatial distribution of air pollution and other types of environmental contamination documented the persistence of environmental health disparities between communities. Due to the shortage of publicly available data, only limited research has been published on the geospatial distribution of drinking water pollution. Here we present a framework for the joint consideration of community-level drinking water data and demographic data. Our analysis builds on a comprehensive data set of drinking water contaminant occurrence for the United States for 2014–2019 and the American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2015–2019) from the U.S. Census Bureau. Focusing on the U.S. states of California and Texas for which geospatial data on community water system service boundaries are publicly available, we examine cumulative cancer risk for water served by community water systems of different sizes relative to demographic characteristics for the populations served by these water systems. In both California and Texas, greater cumulative cancer risk was observed for water systems serving communities with a higher percentage of Hispanic/Latino and Black/African American community members. This investigation demonstrates that it is both practical and essential to incorporate and expand the drinking water data metrics in the analysis of environmental pollution and environmental health. The framework presented here can support the development of public policies to advance environmental health justice priorities on state and federal levels in the U.S.


2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Hopenhayn ◽  
Jessica Rinsky ◽  
Vijay Golla ◽  
Steve Browning ◽  
Heather Bush

2008 ◽  
Vol 116 (6) ◽  
pp. 814-820 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann Aschengrau ◽  
Janice Weinberg ◽  
Sarah Rogers ◽  
Lisa Gallagher ◽  
Michael Winter ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hoda Fotovvat ◽  
Christopher T. Emrich

Abstract Background This study aims to explore the relationship between social vulnerability (SoVI)indicators (race/ethnicity, population structure, socioeconomic status, housing structure, and access/functional needs) with low birth weight (LBW) and preterm delivery (PTD) rates across the Southeastern United States. Methods Annual low birth weight and premature birth rates for all counties were collected between 2000 and 2015. LBW and PTD were recoded into two categories below (0) and above (1) the annual national average for each year. Multinomial logistic regression (MLR) was employed to conduct regression analysis to investigate the relationship. Results Twenty-six and twenty-four different social vulnerability indicators were influential in predicting low birth weight rates and preterm delivery across the SE United States from 2005–2015, respectively. Racial and ethnic variables were among the most frequent influential social vulnerability indicators of low birth weights. Like race and ethnicity, counties with low and medium house values have a higher likelihood of low LBW compared to counties with higher house values. Unlike LBW, race and ethnic characteristics influence PTD rates across the study area in different ways. Whereas LBW rates are driven up in counties with low/medium Hispanic populations compared to high percentage counties, PTD is more strongly associated with Black communities. Further, population structure and socioeconomic status indicators provide the most robust indication of counties more likely to have higher PTD than the national average. Conclusion Influential variables point toward a dire need to comprehensively understand the links between social vulnerability and LBW and PTD. Moving toward a comprehensive view of social vulnerability borne out of the hazards literature provides a more robust understanding of the drivers of adverse birth outcomes that has rarely been addressed in the literature.


Author(s):  
Sara K. Redd ◽  
Kelli Stidham Hall ◽  
Monica S. Aswani ◽  
Bisakha Sen ◽  
Martha Wingate ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 157 ◽  
pp. 52-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirsten S. Almberg ◽  
Mary E. Turyk ◽  
Rachael M. Jones ◽  
Kristin Rankin ◽  
Sally Freels ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document