José del Águila Ferrandis
◽
Ricardo Zamora Rodríguez
◽
Chryssostomos Chryssostomidis
◽
Luca Bonfiglio
Motion prediction of floating bodies in waves represents one of the most challenging problems in naval hydrodynamics. The solution of the seakeeping problem involves the study of complex non-linear wave-body interactions that require large computational costs. For this reason, over the years many seakeeping models have been formulated in order to predict ship motions using simplified flow theories, usually based on potential flow theories solved within the linear assumption.
Neglecting viscous effects in the computation of radiation forces might largely underestimate the energy dissipated by the system while moving at the free surface. This problem is particularly relevant for unconventional floating bodies at resonance. In these operating conditions the linear assumption is no longer valid and conventional Boundary Element Methods, solved in the frequency domain, might predict unrealistic large responses if not corrected with empirical damping coefficients.
The application considered in this study is an offshore platform to be operated in a wind farm requiring operability even in extreme meteorological conditions. In this paper, we compare heave and pitch Response Amplitude Operators, predicted for an offshore platform using three different seakeeping models of increasing complexity; namely a frequency-domain BEM, a high-order BEM solved in time-domain and a non-linear fully viscous model based on the solution of the Unsteady Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes equations (URANS). Results are critically compared in terms of accuracy, applicability and computational costs.