Effectiveness of systemic antibiotic prophylaxis with amoxicillin in preventing postoperative infectious complications after impacted third molar surgery: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials

2011 ◽  
Vol 40 (10) ◽  
pp. 1046-1047 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Campos ◽  
H. Cooper
2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 181-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Troiano ◽  
Luigi Laino ◽  
Marco Cicciù ◽  
Gabriele Cervino ◽  
Luca Fiorillo ◽  
...  

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the clinical efficacy of two routes of dexamethasone administration in reducing the postoperative sequelae after third molar extraction. Electronic databases (PUBMED, SCOPUS and EBSCO library) were screened in order to find both randomized and non-randomized clinical trials that directly compare the submucosal intraoral or the intramuscular extraoral administration of dexamethasone. No restriction about year of publication was imposed. About 340 titles and abstracts were screened independently by two authors. Of these [340 titles], only 4 randomized clinical trials met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. No statistical differences in postoperative pain, swelling and trismus were recorded comparing the intraoral submucosal and the extraoral intramuscular injection of dexamethasone in an extra-oral site.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. e0223063 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra Csenkey ◽  
Gergo Jozsa ◽  
Noemi Gede ◽  
Eszter Pakai ◽  
Benedek Tinusz ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. e58610918398
Author(s):  
Ana Paula Silva Gangá ◽  
Henrique Augusto Pautz Tarantino ◽  
Natália Bermond Arpini ◽  
Tatiany Pimentel Ferreira ◽  
Paula Sampaio de Mello ◽  
...  

Impacted and semi-impacted third molar surgery is a frequent dental procedure. Due to potentially major tissue manipulation during surgery, antibiotic prophylaxis may be indicated to prevent infection of the surgical wound. This study evaluated the surgical conditions of patients following extraction of impacted and semi-impacted third molars with or without prior antibiotic prophylaxis. Signs of infection and inflammation, postoperative pain level and efficacy of the prescribed drugs were recorded. This was a prospective, randomized, double blind clinical trial with split-mouth design. A total of 23 healthy (ASA I) volunteers with indication for bilateral mandibular third molar extraction were recruited, totaling 46 surgical procedures. One hour prior to the procedure, volunteers received 1g of amoxicillin or placebo and a drug for pain prevention and control. The surgical acts were performed by last-year dental students. Postoperative pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale and an 11-point box scale at selected postoperative intervals of 4 h, 12 h, and 24 h. After seven postoperative days, study volunteers were examined for clinical signs of infection and/or inflammation, such as pus, intra and extraoral swelling, trismus, heat, flushing and temperature change. There were only two cases of postoperative complications, one of intraoral edema (placebo group) and one of trismus (antibiotic prophylaxis group). There were no statistically significant differences for any of the indicative signs of infection. The pain scales revealed no differences between pain levels in both groups at all times evaluated, regardless of the pain scale used (P > 0.05). To conclude, the low infection rate observed in our study does not reflect any need for antibiotic prescription in systemically healthy patients. The adverse effects of antibiotics in addition to selection for resistant bacteria outweigh the benefits of antibiotic prophylaxis in healthy (ASA I) patients.


Antibiotics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 698
Author(s):  
Elisabet Roca-Millan ◽  
Albert Estrugo-Devesa ◽  
Alexandra Merlos ◽  
Enric Jané-Salas ◽  
Teresa Vinuesa ◽  
...  

Systemic antibiotics are routinely prescribed in implant procedures, but the lack of consensus causes large differences between clinicians regarding antibiotic prophylaxis regimens. The objectives of this systematic review are to assess the need to prescribe antibiotics to prevent early implant failure and find the most appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis regimen. The electronic search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scielo and Cochrane Central Trials Database for randomized clinical trials of at least 3 months of follow-up. Eleven studies were included in the qualitative analysis. Antibiotics were found to statistically significantly reduce early implant failures (RR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.19–0.47, p < 0.00001; heterogeneity I2 = 0%, p = 0.54). No differences were seen between preoperative or both pre- and postoperative antibiotic regimens (RR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.21–1.55, p = 0.27; heterogeneity I2 = 0%, p = 0.37). A single preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis dose was found to be enough to significantly reduce early implant failures compared to no antibiotic (RR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.21–0.53, p < 0.00001; heterogeneity I2 = 0%, p = 0.61). In conclusion, in healthy patients a single antibiotic prophylaxis dose is indicated to prevent early implant failure.


2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-22
Author(s):  
Marco Tulio Rossi ◽  
Murilo Navarro de Oliveira ◽  
Maria Tereza Campos Vidigal ◽  
Walbert de Andrade Vieira ◽  
Cristiano Elias Figueiredo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document