scholarly journals Increased Risk of Pseudoprogression Among Pediatric Low-Grade Glioma Patients Treated with Proton Versus Photon Radiation Therapy

Author(s):  
E.B. Ludmir ◽  
A. Mahajan ◽  
A.C. Paulino ◽  
J.Y. Jones ◽  
L. Ketonen ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 67 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Iersel ◽  
Hanneke M. Santen ◽  
Brian Potter ◽  
Zhenghong Li ◽  
Heather M. Conklin ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Branislav Jeremic ◽  
Yuta Shibamoto ◽  
Danica Grujicic ◽  
Biljana Milicic ◽  
Miroslav Stojanovic ◽  
...  

Neurology ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 56 (10) ◽  
pp. 1255-1256 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Peterson ◽  
L. M. DeAngelis

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 686-695 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ethan B Ludmir ◽  
Anita Mahajan ◽  
Arnold C Paulino ◽  
Jeremy Y Jones ◽  
Leena M Ketonen ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (22) ◽  
pp. 3598-3604 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas E. Merchant ◽  
Larry E. Kun ◽  
Shengjie Wu ◽  
Xiaoping Xiong ◽  
Robert A. Sanford ◽  
...  

Purpose The use of radiotherapy in pediatric low-grade glioma (LGG) is controversial, especially for young patients. We conducted a phase II trial of conformal radiation therapy (CRT) to estimate disease control by using a 10-mm clinical target volume (CTV) margin. Materials and Methods Between August 1997 and August 2006, 78 pediatric patients with LGG and a median age of 8.9 years (range, 2.2 to 19.8 years) received 54 Gy CRT by using a 10-mm CTV and by targeting with systematic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) registration. Tumor locations were diencephalon (n = 58), cerebral hemisphere (n = 3), and cerebellum (n = 17). Sixty-seven patients had documented or presumed WHO grade 1 tumors, 25 patients had prior chemotherapy, and 13 patients had neurofibromatosis type 1. Results During a median follow-up of 89 months, 13 patients experienced disease progression. One patient experienced marginal treatment failure, eight experienced local failures, and four experienced metastatic failure. The mean and standard error 5- and 10-year event-free (87.4% ± 4.4% and 74.3% ± 15.4%, respectively) and overall (98.5% ± 1.6% and 95.9% ± 5.8%, respectively) survival rates were determined. The mean and standard error cumulative incidences of local failure at 5 and 10 years were 8.7% ± 3.5% and 16.4% ± 5.4%, respectively. The mean and standard error cumulative incidence of vasculopathy was 4.79% ± 2.73% at 6 years, and it was higher for those younger than 5 years of age (P = .0105) at the time of CRT. Conclusion This large, prospective series of irradiated children with LGG demonstrates that CRT with a 10-mm CTV does not compromise disease control. The results suggest that CRT should be delayed in young patients to reduce the risk of vasculopathy.


Cancer ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (15) ◽  
pp. 3735-3742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gita Suneja ◽  
Michelle Alonso-Basanta ◽  
Robert Lustig ◽  
John Y. K. Lee ◽  
Justin E. Bekelman

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reed Ritterbusch ◽  
Lia M. Halasz ◽  
Jerome J. Graber

Abstract Purpose Criteria by the Radiologic Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) group outline the diagnosis of pseudoprogression (Ps) after photon therapy for gliomas based on timing and location. We noted that patients receiving proton therapy manifested radiographic changes that appear different than Ps after photon therapy, which could be interpreted as tumor progression. In this study, we retrospectively reviewed MR imaging after proton or photon radiation for gliomas. We propose criteria to characterize proton pseudoprogression (ProPs) as distinct from Ps seen after photons. Methods Post-treatment MR imaging, clinical and pathological data of low grade glioma patients were reviewed. Overall, 57 patients receiving protons were reviewed for the presence of ProPs, and 43 patients receiving photons were reviewed for any equivalent imaging changes. Data collected included the location and timing of the new enhancement, tumor grade, molecular subtype, chemotherapy received, and clinical symptoms. Results Fourteen patients (24.6%) had new enhancement following radiation therapy that was unique to treatment with protons. The mean time to development of the ProPs was 15.4 months (7–27 months). We established the following criteria to characterize ProPs: located at the distal end of the proton beam; resolves without tumor-directed therapy; and subjectively multifocal, patchy, and small (< 1 cm). In the group receiving photons, none had changes that met our criteria for ProPs. Conclusion Patients who receive protons have unique imaging changes after radiation therapy. ProPs could be mistaken for tumor progression, but typically resolves on follow up. Further studies are needed to understand the radiobiology and pathophysiology underlying these imaging changes.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. e356-e361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophia C. Kamran ◽  
Michael Dworkin ◽  
Andrzej Niemierko ◽  
Marc Bussiere ◽  
Kevin S. Oh ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document