scholarly journals Real-life small airway outcomes in severe asthma patients receiving biologic therapies

Author(s):  
Rory Chan ◽  
Chris RuiWen Kuo ◽  
Brian Lipworth
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Hirofumi Watanabe ◽  
Toshihiro Shirai ◽  
Keita Hirai ◽  
Taisuke Akamatsu ◽  
Hiromasa Nakayasu ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Cristiano Caruso ◽  
Stefania Colantuono ◽  
Sara Urbani ◽  
Enrico Heffler ◽  
Giorgio Walter Canonica ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 2999-3008.e1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Levi B. Richards ◽  
Job J.M.H. van Bragt ◽  
Reim Aarab ◽  
Cristina Longo ◽  
Anne H. Neerincx ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paloma Campo ◽  
jose gregorio Soto campos ◽  
Ana Moreira Jorge ◽  
Santiago Quirce ◽  
Alicia Padilla ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 00253-2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katia M.C. Verhamme ◽  
Catherine Lucet ◽  
Alain Van Meerhaeghe ◽  
Guy G.O. Brusselle ◽  
Marie-Laurence Lambert

BackgroundGuidelines recommend omalizumab in patients with uncontrolled severe allergic asthma. We investigated real-life use of omalizumab, the proportion of patients fulfilling eligibility criteria, its costs and its effectiveness.MethodIn a cohort of asthma patients initiating treatment with omalizumab in Belgium between 2010 and 2016, we investigated fulfilment of eligibility criteria (chronic use of high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) plus long-acting β2-agonists (LABAs) and ≥2 severe asthma exacerbations in previous year), and compared hospitalisations and systemic corticosteroid consumption in the year before and after omalizumab initiation. We computed healthcare costs in the respective time periods and compared the cost per prevented hospitalisation in patients fulfilling eligibility criteria versus those who did not.ResultsBetween 2010 and 2016, omalizumab treatment was initiated in 2068 patients with asthma; only 24% fulfilled the eligibility criteria, mainly due to nonadherence to high-dose ICSs + LABAs. The proportion of patients hospitalised for asthma decreased from 41% to 21% in eligible patients (absolute risk reduction, 20%), whereas the absolute risk reduction was 5% (from 19% to 14%) in noneligible patients. The cost per prevented hospitalisation was €44 238 versus €139 495, respectively. Chronic use of systemic corticosteroids was discontinued in 35% of eligible patients versus 15% of noneligible patients.ConclusionIn Belgium, omalizumab is mostly initiated in uncontrolled asthma patients who are nonadherent to ICSs + LABAs. Omalizumab decreases hospitalisations and the use of systemic corticosteroids, but at a high cost. Careful management of patients with difficult-to-treat asthma should be a priority before prescribing omalizumab.


Allergy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 75 (6) ◽  
pp. 1460-1463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diego Bagnasco ◽  
Alessandro Massolo ◽  
Marco Bonavia ◽  
Luisa Brussino ◽  
Caterina Bucca ◽  
...  

Allergy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paloma Campo ◽  
Gregorio Soto Campos ◽  
Ana Moreira ◽  
Santiago Quirce ◽  
Alicia Padilla‐Galo ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. e8-e16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelica Tiotiu

Background: Severe asthma is a heterogeneous disease that consists of various phenotypes driven by different pathways. Associated with significant morbidity, an important negative impact on the quality of life of patients, and increased health care costs, severe asthma represents a challenge for the clinician. With the introduction of various antibodies that target type 2 inflammation (T2) pathways, severe asthma therapy is gradually moving to a personalized medicine approach. Objective: The purpose of this review was to emphasize the important role of personalized medicine in adult severe asthma management. Methods: An extensive research was conducted in medical literature data bases by applying terms such as “severe asthma” associated with “structured approach,” “comorbidities,” “biomarkers,” “phenotypes/endotypes,” and “biologic therapies.” Results: The management of severe asthma starts with a structured approach to confirm the diagnosis, assess the adherence to medications and identify confounding factors and comorbidities. The definition of phenotypes or endotypes (phenotypes defined by mechanisms and identified through biomarkers) is an important step toward the use of personalized medicine in asthma. Severe allergic and nonallergic eosinophilic asthma are two defined T2 phenotypes for which there are efficacious targeted biologic therapies currently available. Non-T2 phenotype remains to be characterized, and less efficient target therapy exists. Conclusion: Despite important progress in applying personalized medicine to severe asthma, especially in T2 inflammatory phenotypes, future research is needed to find valid biomarkers predictive for the response to available biologic therapies to develop more effective therapies in non-T2 phenotype.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document