scholarly journals Are CIN3 risk or CIN3+ risk measures reliable surrogates for invasive cervical cancer risk?

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 602-606 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Marshall Austin ◽  
Agnieszka Onisko ◽  
Chengquan Zhao
2010 ◽  
Vol 129 (2) ◽  
pp. 449-459 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos A. González ◽  
Noemie Travier ◽  
Leila Luján-Barroso ◽  
Xavier Castellsagué ◽  
F. Xavier Bosch ◽  
...  

1988 ◽  
Vol 128 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
PETER NISCHAN ◽  
KLAUS EBELING ◽  
CHRISTOF SCHINDLER

The Lancet ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 341 (8853) ◽  
pp. 1116-1119 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.K.S. Jha ◽  
V. Beral ◽  
M.C. Pike ◽  
C. Hermon ◽  
J. Peto ◽  
...  

1990 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabio Parazzini ◽  
Eva Negri ◽  
Carlo La Vecchia ◽  
Luca Bocciolone

2013 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 405-413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison G. Abraham ◽  
Gypsyamber D’Souza ◽  
Yuezhou Jing ◽  
Stephen J. Gange ◽  
Timothy R. Sterling ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Sonia Andersson ◽  
Karen Belkić ◽  
Miriam Mints ◽  
Ellinor Östensson

AbstractThis study aims to investigate acceptance of vaginal self-sampling for high-risk human papilloma virus (HPV) among long-term screening non-attenders at increased cervical cancer risk and to identify leverage points to promote screening adherence among these women. Forty-three long-term screening non-attenders performed home vaginal self-sampling for HPV, had positive HPV results, and subsequently attended gynecologic examination. Sixteen (37.2%) had high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2 or 3), and two had invasive cervical cancer. Forty-one of these women completed a questionnaire concerning Specific Knowledge about HPV, CIN, and cervical cancer, potential barriers to screening and views about self-sampling. Results were compared with 479 women treated for CIN2+ who attended gynecologic follow-up and also performed self-sampling. Significant multivariate predictors of long-term non-attender status compared with referents were low Specific Knowledge, high confidence in self-sampling, and potential barriers—refraining from activity to attend gynecologic examination, needing another's help to attend, and long travel time. Non-attenders citing fear/refraining from gynecologic examination as why they preferred self-sampling significantly more often had lowest Specific Knowledge compared with other non-attenders. All non-attenders could envision themselves doing self-sampling again while only 74% of referents endorsed this statement (p = 0.0003). We conclude that HPV self-sampling is an acceptable option for women at increased cervical cancer risk who have been long-term screening non-attenders. Educational outreach to enhance Specific Knowledge about HPV, CIN and cervical cancer is critical. Those non-attenders who explicitly avoid gynecologic examinations need special attention. Trial Registry: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02750124


Heliyon ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. e05919
Author(s):  
Shiba Das ◽  
Lutfur Naher ◽  
Tutun Das Aka ◽  
Md. Abdul Aziz ◽  
Samia Shabnaz ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document