scholarly journals Supporting information retrieval from electronic health records: A report of University of Michigan’s nine-year experience in developing and using the Electronic Medical Record Search Engine (EMERSE)

2015 ◽  
Vol 55 ◽  
pp. 290-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Hanauer ◽  
Qiaozhu Mei ◽  
James Law ◽  
Ritu Khanna ◽  
Kai Zheng
Author(s):  
Nicola T. Shaw

AbstractThis review attempts to address the question: is the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) our best friend or sworn enemy in the context of Clinical Governance and Laboratory Medicine? It provides a brief overview of the history and development of Clinical Governance before going on to define an EMR. It considers how EMRs could assist in delivering quality care in laboratory medicine. A number of outstanding issues regarding EMRs and electronic health records (EHRs) are identified and discussed briefly before the author provides a brief outlook on the future of clinical governance and EMRs in laboratory medicine.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luke Murray ◽  
Divya Gopinath ◽  
Monica Agrawal ◽  
Steven Horng ◽  
David Sontag ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. e0255467
Author(s):  
Xia Ning ◽  
Ziwei Fan ◽  
Evan Burgun ◽  
Zhiyun Ren ◽  
Titus Schleyer

Due to the rapid growth of information available about individual patients, most physicians suffer from information overload and inefficiencies when they review patient information in health information technology systems. In this paper, we present a novel hybrid dynamic and multi-collaborative filtering method to improve information retrieval from electronic health records. This method recommends relevant information from electronic health records to physicians during patient visits. It models information search dynamics using a Markov model. It also leverages the key idea of collaborative filtering, originating from Recommender Systems, for prioritizing information based on various similarities among physicians, patients and information items. We tested this new method using electronic health record data from the Indiana Network for Patient Care, a large, inter-organizational clinical data repository maintained by the Indiana Health Information Exchange. Our experimental results demonstrated that, for top-5 recommendations, our method was able to correctly predict the information in which physicians were interested in 46.7% of all test cases. For top-1 recommendations, the corresponding figure was 24.7%. In addition, the new method was 22.3% better than the conventional Markov model for top-1 recommendations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document