scholarly journals Depression, quality of life and primary care: A cross-sectional study

2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Panos Andriopoulos ◽  
Maria Lotti-Lykousa ◽  
Evelina Pappa ◽  
Angelos A. Papadopoulos ◽  
Dimitris Niakas
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional

Factors Associated With the Quality of Life of Patients With Venous Leg Ulcers in Primary Care: Cross-Sectional Study

2020 ◽  
pp. 153473462096756
Author(s):  
Carmen Folguera-Álvarez ◽  
Sofia Garrido-Elustondo ◽  
Milagros Rico-Blázquez ◽  
José Verdú-Soriano
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Perceived Quality ◽  
T Test ◽  
Leg Ulcers ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Perceived Quality Of Life

The presence of venous leg ulcers (VLU) is associated with emotional disorders in individuals who have conditions, such as depression, anxiety, and sleeping problems, which result in a reduced perceived quality of life by these individuals. The study aim was to describe the perceived quality of life and associated factors for individuals with VLU. We conducted a cross-sectional study in 22 primary care health centers with a sample of 93 individuals with VLU. The variables collected were the following: perceived quality of life measured with Spanish version of the Charing Cross Venous Ulcer Questionnaire (CCVUQ-e), ulcer severity measured with the RESVECH 2.0 Score, demographic variables, and those related to the healing process. The results showed a mean CCVUQ-e score of 47.4 ± 11.8 points (Mean ± SD), with the most affected dimension being the emotional status, followed by cosmesis, social interaction, and domestic activities. The mean RESVECH 2.0 score was 11.1 ± 3.7 points. An association was found between ulcer-related pain and poorer quality of life ( P < .05, t test) and between erythema in perilesional skin and poorer quality life ( P < .05, t test). The signs of infection and inflammation in the VLUs were as follows: increasing exudate, friable tissue, and biofilm-compatible tissue, which were associated with a poorer quality of life ( P < .05, t test). The multivariate model was statistically significant and explained a variability of 26% in the CCVUQ-e score. This study confirms that wound severity, pain, and signs of infection in VLU decrease the perceived quality of life of individuals with these wounds.

scholarly journals Quality of life among pregnant women with urinary incontinence: A cross-sectional study in a Malaysian primary care clinic

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. e0250714
Author(s):  
Aida Jaffar ◽  
Sherina Mohd-Sidik ◽  
Rosliza Abd Manaf ◽  
Chai Nien Foo ◽  
Quan Fu Gan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Primary Care Clinic ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Care Clinic ◽  
International Consultation

Background Pregnant women have an increased risk of urinary incontinence (UI), affecting their quality of life (QoL). This study aims to determine UI and its relationship with QoL among incontinent pregnant women. Methods This was a cross-sectional study in a semi-urban primary care clinic in Selangor, Malaysia, among pregnant women aged 18 years old and above. The validated study instruments consisted of questions on socio-demography, the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-UI Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) to determine UI and the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Quality of Life Module (ICIQ-LUTSQoL) to assess their QoL. A generalised linear model was used to determine the association between the continent and incontinent pregnant women with QoL. Results Of the approached 610 respondents, 440 consented to participate in the study, resulting in a response rate of 72.1%. The mean age was 29.8 years old (SD 4.69) with 82.2% (n = 148) having stress UI. Significant independent factors related to the decreased QoL were mid to late trimester (OR 3.06, 95% CI 1.48–6.32), stress UI, (OR 6.94, 95%CI 4.00–12.04) and urge UI (OR3.87, 95%CI 0.48–31.28). Non-Malay improved QoL (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.16–0.52). Conclusions All types of UI significantly affecting pregnant women’s QoL. This information is useful in enhancing antenatal management at the primary care level, whereby they should be screened for UI and provided with effective early intervention to improve their QoL.

scholarly journals Factors associated with health literacy in multimorbid patients in primary care: a cross-sectional study in Switzerland

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. e018281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra A N’Goran ◽  
Jérôme Pasquier ◽  
Anouk Deruaz-Luyet ◽  
Bernard Burnand ◽  
Dagmar M Haller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Literacy ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Treatment Burden ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Multimorbid Patients

ObjectiveTo identify factors associated with health literacy in multimorbid patients.DesignA nationwide cross-sectional study in Switzerland. Univariate and multivariate linear regressions were calculated to identify variables associated with health literacy. A multiple imputation approach was used to deal with missing values.ParticipantsMultimorbid patients recruited in primary care settings (n=888), above 18 years old and suffering from at least 3 of 75 chronic conditions on a predefined list based on the International Classification of Primary Care 2.Main measuresHealth literacy was assessed using the European Health Literacy Survey project questionnaire (HLS-EU 6). This comprises six items scored from 1 to 4 (very difficult=1, fairly difficult=2, fairly easy=3, very easy=4), and the total health literacy score is computed as their mean. As we wished to understand the determinants associated with lower health literacy, the HLS-EU 6 score was the only dependent variable; all other covariates were considered independent.ResultsThe mean health literacy score (SD) was 2.9 (0.5). Multivariate analyses found significant associations between low health literacy scores and treatment burden scores (β=−0.004, 95% CI −0.006 to 0.002); marital status, predominantly the divorced group (β=0.136, 95% CI 0.012 to 0.260); dimensions of the EuroQuol 5 Dimension 3 Level (EQ5D3L) quality of life assessment, that is, for moderate problems with mobility (β=−0.086, 95% CI −0.157 to 0.016); and with moderate problems (β=−0.129, 95% CI −0.198 to 0.060) and severe problems with anxiety/depression (β=−0.343, 95% CI −0.500 to 0.186).ConclusionsMultimorbid patients with a high treatment burden, altered quality of life by problems with mobility, anxiety or depression, often also have low levels of health literacy. Primary care practitioners should therefore pay particular attention to these patients in their daily practice.

scholarly journals Management of depression in primary care - A cross-sectional study in the North-East of England, UK

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Reshma Hegde ◽  
Prinul Gunputh ◽  
Baxi Sinha
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Secondary Care ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Free Text ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
North East ◽  
The North

Background: Depression is a common and serious disorder that impairs quality of life. Since general practitioners (GP) are considered gatekeepers to secondary care, the choice of interventions offered in primary care can have a significant impact not only on patients’ quality of life, but also on health service demands. Objective: To evaluate the confidence of GPs in diagnosing and managing depression; and, to assess the factors influencing their strategy in treating depression. Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out among GPs working in the North-East of England, UK. The survey questionnaire consisted of mostly close-ended questions with some allowing for free-text comments (see Appendix 1). The responses obtained were analysed using Microsoft Excel. Results: Among the total of 63 respondents, most GPs were comfortable diagnosing depression. Most would consider combining talking therapies with antidepressants (68.3%) at presentation, followed by referral to talking therapies alone (41.2%). In only 14.3% of cases would antidepressant therapy alone be considered. For those patients non-responsive to initial treatment, 25.4% considered offering a different antidepressant or adjunct medication (such as a sedative, anxiolytic, or beta-blocker), and another 25.4% of GPs considered a combination with another antidepressant. 46.0% of participants were not comfortable prescribing dual antidepressants due to concerns about side effects, lack of experience, paucity of guidelines, and lack of timely access and guidance from the local mental team. Nearly all (98.4%) GP participants would agree to prescribe dual antidepressants on advice of the mental health team with telephone advice being the preferred means of communication in 65.1% of cases. Conclusion: The results of this study can help to develop closer co-operation between primary and secondary care by not only upskilling GPs through various means (educational events, training posts, etc.), but by also creating better communication channels at the interface between those two services. Key words: antidepressants, combination therapy, depression, primary care, primary-secondary care interface

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document