Dexketoprofen trometamol in the acute treatment of migraine attack: A phase II, randomized, double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled, dose optimization study

2013 ◽  
Vol 333 ◽  
pp. e487
Author(s):  
F. Mainardi ◽  
F. Maggioni ◽  
D. Pezzola ◽  
D. Zava ◽  
G. Zanchin
Author(s):  
DW Dodick ◽  
RB Lipton ◽  
J Ailani ◽  
K Lu ◽  
H Lakkis ◽  
...  

Background: To evaluate efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ubrogepant, an oral CGRP receptor antagonist, for acute treatment of a single migraine attack. Methods: Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, single-attack, phase 3 study (NCT02828020). Patients randomized 1:1:1 to placebo, ubrogepant 50mg, or ubrogepant 100mg had 60 days to treat one migraine attack (moderate/severe pain intensity). Co-primary efficacy endpoints: pain freedom 2 hours post initial dose and absence of most bothersome migraine-associated symptom (MBS). Results: 1672 patients were randomized (safety population: n=1436; mITT population: n=1327). Mean age: 40.7 years; white (82.4%); female (87.5%). A significantly greater percentage of ubrogepant- than placebo-treated patients achieved pain freedom 2 hours post initial dose (50mg: 19.2%, adjusted P=0.0023; 100mg: 21.2%, adjusted P=0.0003; placebo: 11.8%). A significantly greater percentage of ubrogepant patients achieved absence of MBS (50mg: 38.6%, adjusted P=0.0023, 100mg: 37.7%, adjusted P=0.0023; placebo: 27.8%). The adverse event (AE) profile of ubrogepant was similar to placebo. The most common AEs (incidence ≥2% in any treatment group) within 48 hours of initial or optional second dose were nausea, somnolence, and dry mouth (all with incidence <5%). Conclusions: Both co-primary endpoints were met, with clinically meaningful effects on migraine headache pain and MBS. Ubrogepant was well tolerated, with no identified safety concerns.


Neurology ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 1225-1230 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Ryan ◽  
A. Elkind ◽  
C. C. Baker ◽  
W. Mullican ◽  
S. DeBussey ◽  
...  

Background: Sumatriptan nasal spray may be particularly useful for patients whose nausea and vomiting preclude them from using oral migraine medication or for patients who prefer not to use an injectable migraine medication. The objective of this study was to evaluate in two clinical studies the efficacy and tolerability of the intranasal form of sumatriptan in the acute treatment of a single migraine attack. International Headache Society-diagnosed adult migraineurs in two randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter studies (n = 409 and 436) used sumatriptan nasal spray 20 mg, 10 mg, or placebo (2:1:1) for the acute treatment of a single migraine attack at home. Predose and at predetermined postdose intervals, patients recorded headache severity (none, mild, moderate, severe); time to meaningful relief; clinical disability (none, mildly impaired, severely impaired, bed rest required); presence/absence of nausea, photophobia, and phonophobia; and the occurrence of adverse events. Two hours postdose in the two studies, moderate or severe baseline pain was reduced to mild or none in 62 to 63% of patients treated with sumatriptan 20 mg, 43 to 54% of patients treated with sumatriptan 10 mg, and 29 to 35% of placebo-treated patients (p < 0.05 20 mg versus placebo for both studies and 10 mg versus placebo for study 1). Onset of relief relative to placebo began as early as 15 minutes postdose(sumatriptan 20 mg, study 2). Clinical disability at 2 hours postdose was reported as mildly impaired or normal in 72 to 74% of patients treated with sumatriptan 20 mg, 56 to 68% of patients treated with sumatriptan 10 mg, and 47 to 58% of placebo-treated patients (p < 0.05 20 mg versus placebo for both studies). Similar efficacy rates were observed for nausea, photophobia, and phonophobia. The most common adverse event in the active treatment groups was disturbance of taste (bad, bitter, or unpleasant taste). Aside from this event, the pattern and incidence of adverse events did not differ among treatment groups. From these results we determined that sumatriptan nasal spray is a rapidly effective, well-tolerated migraine treatment. The 20-mg dose was effective in treating the entire migraine symptom complex, and the 10-mg dose was less consistently effective.


Cephalalgia ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 22 (7) ◽  
pp. 513-519 ◽  
Author(s):  
P-HM van der Kuy ◽  
FWHM Merkus ◽  
JJHM Lohman ◽  
JWM ter Berg ◽  
PM Hooymans

Drugs which directly counteract nitric oxide (NO), such as endothelial receptor blockers, NO-synthase inhibitors, and NO-scavengers, may be effective in the acute treatment of migraine, but are also likely to be effective in migraine prophylaxis. In the underlying pilot study the prophylactic effect of the NO scavenger hydroxocobalamin after intranasal administration in migraine was evaluated. Twenty patients, with a history of migraine of <1 year and with two to eight migraine attacks per month, were included in an open trial. A baseline period was followed by an active treatment period of 3 months with 1 mg intranasal hydroxocobalamin daily. Patients were instructed to complete a diary in which details of each attack were described. A reduction in migraine attack frequency of ≥50% was seen in 10 of 19 patients, which corresponds to 53% of the patients (responders). A reduction of ≥30% was noted in 63% of the patients. The mean attack frequency in the total study population showed a reduction from 4.7 ± 1.7 attacks per month to 2.7 ± 1.6 ( P< 0.001). For the responders the migraine attack frequency was reduced from 5.2 ± 1.9 (baseline) to 1.9 ± 1.3 attacks per month ( P < 0.005), while for those who did not respond a non-significant reduction was found: 4.1 ± 1.4 to 3.7 ± 1.5 (P > 0.1). A reduction was also observed for the total duration of the migraine attacks per month, the total number of migraine days per month and the number of medication doses for acute treatment used per month. This is the first prospective, open study indicating that intranasal hydroxocobalamin may have a prophylactic effect in migraine. As a percentage of responders in prophylactic trials of > 35-40% is unlikely to be a placebo effect, a double-blind study is warranted.


Cephalalgia ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 30 (8) ◽  
pp. 933-942 ◽  
Author(s):  
PG Djupesland ◽  
P Dočekal ◽  

Introduction: Intranasal sumatriptan is an option for the treatment of migraine; however, nasal delivery using conventional spray pumps is suboptimal. Methods: Adult subjects ( n = 117) with migraine were enrolled in a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled study. A single migraine attack was treated in-clinic with sumatriptan 10 mg, sumatriptan 20 mg or placebo administered intranasally by a novel bi-directional powder delivery device when migraine was moderate or severe. Results: A greater proportion of subjects who received sumatriptan were pain-free at 120 minutes compared with those who received placebo (10 mg/20 mg sumatriptan vs. placebo = 54%/57% vs. 25%, P < .05). Significant benefits were also observed for pain relief at 120 minutes (84%/80% vs. 44%, P < .001/.01) and as early as 60 minutes (73%/74% vs. 38%, P < .01) and for 48 hours sustained pain-free ( P < .05). Treatment-related adverse events were rare, with a metallic taste being the most commonly reported (10%/13%). Conclusions: Sumatriptan nasal powder administered using the new device during a migraine attack was effective and well tolerated.


Neurology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 91 (24) ◽  
pp. e2222-e2232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernice Kuca ◽  
Stephen D. Silberstein ◽  
Linda Wietecha ◽  
Paul H. Berg ◽  
Gregory Dozier ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo assess the efficacy and safety of lasmiditan in the acute treatment of migraine.MethodsAdult patients with migraine were randomized (1:1:1) to a double-blind dose of oral lasmiditan 200 mg, lasmiditan 100 mg, or placebo and were asked to treat their next migraine attack within 4 hours of onset. Over 48 hours after dosing, patients used an electronic diary to record headache pain and the presence of nausea, phonophobia, and photophobia, one of which was designated their most bothersome symptom (MBS).ResultsOf the 1,856 patients who treated an attack, 77.9% had ≥1 cardiovascular risk factors in addition to migraine. Compared with placebo, more patients dosed with lasmiditan 200 mg were free of headache pain at 2 hours after dosing (32.2% vs 15.3%; odds ratio [OR] 2.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.0–3.6, p< 0.001), similar to those dosed with lasmiditan 100 mg (28.2%; OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.6–3.0, p< 0.001). Furthermore, compared with those dosed with placebo, more patients dosed with lasmiditan 200 mg (40.7% vs 29.5%; OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.3–2.1, p< 0.001) and lasmiditan 100 mg (40.9%; OR 1.7, 95% CI, 1.3–2.2, p< 0.001) were free of their MBS at 2 hours after dosing. Adverse events were mostly mild or moderate in intensity.ConclusionsLasmiditan dosed at 200 and 100 mg was efficacious and well tolerated in the treatment of acute migraine among patients with a high level of cardiovascular risk factors.ClinicalTrials.gov identifierNCT02439320.Classification of evidenceThis study provides Class I evidence that for adult patients with migraine, lasmiditan increases the proportion of subjects who are headache pain free at 2 hours after treating a migraine attack.


Cephalalgia ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 8 (8_suppl) ◽  
pp. 35-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dieter Soyka ◽  
Ziya Taneri ◽  
Wolfgang Oestreich ◽  
Rainer Schmidt

Flunarizine, 20 mg by slow intravenous injection, was studied in the acute treatment of migraine attacks in a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. At the end of the 60 min observation period, 23 of the 31 (74.2%) patients treated with flunarizine reported complete relief, or a pain reduction of more than 50%, vs. 8 of 29 (27.6%) placebo patients ( p < 0.017). Accompanying symptoms also improved significantly better in the flunarizine than in the placebo group. The investigators evaluated the therapy as good or excellent in 77.4% of the flunarizine and in 27.6% of the placebo patients, respectively. Tolerance of the therapy was good and comparable in the two groups. Somnolence was the only flunarizinerelated adverse reaction. Blood pressure and heart rate were not affected. Flunarizine i.v. deserves further study in the acute treatment of a migraine attack.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document