Imperfect competition, border protection and consumer boycott: The future of the dairy industry in Israel

2013 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 838-851 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dorothee Flaig ◽  
Ofir Rubin ◽  
Khalid Siddig
1958 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 102-106
Author(s):  
J. C. Flake

Serving the best interests of the consumer is the responsibility of industry and of regulatory officials. This requires that both be adaptable to change; have a long-rang point of view; and concentrate on problems of the future rather than those of the past. Emphasis is needed on fundamentals in milk quality and sanitation; increasing consumer appeal; and continual increase in efficiency of dairy production.


Author(s):  
T. R. Ashton

The paper gives an account of the methods of packaging milk which have been in use in Britain since 1900 (approximately). The author endeavours to explain the reasons for changes or developments in the light of technical progress within the dairy industry and the advances which have taken place in associated industries. The importance of hygiene, economics, conformity with legislation, and changes which have occurred during the present century are discussed. Particular emphasis will be given to the use of the glass bottle as a container for milk, the reasons why it has remained in use for so long, and the likelihood of its being in use for some considerable time in the future. Washing, filling, and handling methods in relation to the glass bottle will be dealt with in detail. Improvements in design standardization will be considered, as well as the effects of reducing the weights of bottles and surface treatments which are now being adopted. The usage of alternative materials for the packaging of milk will be considered. The difficulties associated with the introduction of cartons are considered, and the possibilities of increased sales in these and other containers in the future receive attention. Plastic bottles, sachets, and bag-in-box developments for the packaging of milk are discussed, and indications given of their limitations, advantages and economics under commercial conditions. The aseptic packing of milk in Tetra Paks is discussed in detail. An account of experimental work on different laminates for this type of milk, and their effect on flavour changes, will be explained. The author's views on future trends in the packaging of milk are indicated.


2017 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 120-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. O’Brien ◽  
D. Hennessy

AbstractThe Irish dairy industry is critically important to the economy and general well-being of a large section of the Irish population. Its quality, sustainability and maintenance are the key for a vibrant rural society in the future. Two important elements for the future of this industry include (a) the quality, marketing and sale of dairy products on the export market and (b) sustainability from the perspectives of people, planet and profit. This paper provides a short review of current scientific evidence in relation to a number of topics, each of which is important in maintaining and developing dairy product quality and the sustainability of the Irish dairy industry. The topics addressed in the paper are as follows: the parameters of milk composition; milk processing; hygiene quality and safety; farm management practices and the regulations that govern such practices; animal health and welfare; environmental impacts; economic implications for farm families and rural communities; and the overall future sustainability of the family-based dairy farm structure.


1997 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 315-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nobuhiro Suzuki ◽  
Harry M. Kaiser

AbstractThis article examines whether the assumption of perfect competition in the U.S. dairy industry biases the findings of economic impacts of generic dairy advertising. An imperfect competition model based on an approach similar to that of Appelbaum is developed and used to evaluate generic milk advertising. The results are compared with a perfect competition model. The findings indicate positive price and quantity impacts due to generic advertising. The differences in magnitude of impacts between the two models are small, suggesting that the assumption of perfect competition for U.S. dairy models is plausible.


1982 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 121-123
Author(s):  
Robert L. Christensen

In 1979 it was estimated that the total number of cattle and calves on farms in the six New England states was 717,000 head. To place this in perspective, this number corresponds to one-fourth the number of head on Illinois farms in that year. Put another way, the New England cattle inventory is 0.6 percent of the national herd. Beef cow numbers in New England totaled 42,000 head in 1979 or 0.1 percent of the national beef cow herd. As nearly everyone knows, the dairy industry is responsible for the bulk of the cattle industry in the region. The number of beef type heifers and steers over 500 pounds (a rough indicator of marketings) for the region was 24,000 head in 1979. Cattle slaughter in New England plants (including cull dairy animals) totaled 161,500 head in 1978 or 0.4 percent of the national slaughter figure (Agricultural Statistics, 1979).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document