457 PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE AS A TREATMENT OPTION FOR LOW-RISK PROSTATE CANCER

2010 ◽  
Vol 183 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Joyce Davison ◽  
S. Larry Goldenberg
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen D. Lyons ◽  
Hsin H. Li ◽  
Emily M. Mader ◽  
Telisa M. Stewart ◽  
Christopher P. Morley ◽  
...  

Benefits of early diagnosis and treatment remain debatable for men with low-risk prostate cancer. Active surveillance (AS) is an alternative to treatment. The goal of AS is to identify patients whose cancer is progressing rapidly while avoiding treatment in the majority of patients. The purpose of this study was to explore cognitive and affective representations of AS within a clinical environment that promotes AS a viable option for men with low-risk prostate cancer. Participants included patients for whom AS and active treatment were equally viable options, as well as practitioners who were involved in consultations for prostate cancer. Data were generated from semistructured interviews and audits of consultation notes and were analyzed using thematic analysis. Nineteen patients and 16 practitioners completed a semistructured interview. Patients generally viewed AS as a temporary strategy that was largely equated with inaction. There was variation in the degree to which inaction was viewed as warranted or favorable. Patient perceptions of AS were generally malleable and able to be influenced by information from trusted sources. Encouraging slow deliberation and multiple consultations may facilitate greater understanding and acceptance of AS as a viable treatment option for low-risk prostate cancer.


2013 ◽  
Vol 37 (9) ◽  
pp. 533-537 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Hernández ◽  
C. Blázquez ◽  
E. de la Peña ◽  
E. Pérez-Fernández ◽  
F.J. Díaz ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 184
Author(s):  
Gagan Gautam ◽  
Shanky Singh ◽  
Saurabh Patil ◽  
AshwinSunil Tamhankar ◽  
Puneet Ahluwalia

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document