684 RADIUM-223 CHLORIDE (ALPHARADIN) IMPACT ON OVERALL SURVIVAL AND SKELETAL-RELATED EVENTS IN PATIENTS WITH CASTRATION-RESISTANT PROSTATE CANCER WITH BONE METASTASES A PHASE III RANDOMIZED TRIAL (ALSYMPCA)

167 Background: The ALSYMPCA study was conducted to evaluate the alpha-emitting radiopharmaceutical Radium-223 Chloride (BAY 88-8223) in patients with symptomatic bone metastases in Castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). This trial met its primary endpoint of overall survival at the time of pre-planned interim analysis. Post hoc analysis showed a reduction from baseline in total ALP at 12 weeks (32% reduction in the BAY 88-8223 arm vs. 37% increase in placebo arm, P < 0.001) (Sartor et al. ASCO 2013). We are reporting here a single-arm, open-label, multicenter, phase II clinical study of BAY 88-8223 in Japanese patients with symptomatic CRPC with bone metastases. Methods: Eligible patients had progressive, symptomatic CRPC with at least 2 bone metastases on bone scintigraphy and no known visceral metastases; were receiving Best Standard of Care; and either had previously received docetaxel, were docetaxel ineligible, or had refused docetaxel. Patients received 6 injections of radium-223 (50 kBq/kg IV) every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was percentage of change in total ALP from baseline at 12 weeks. Secondary endpoints included overall survival, time to symptomatic skeletal event, percentage of change in bone ALP/PSA/biomarkers, and safety. Results: A total of 67 subjects were enrolled; 18 were screening failures, and 49 were received to the study treatment and received at least one administration from September 2013 to May 2014. The mean percent change in total ALP from baseline at 12 weeks was -19.3% (95%CI: -28.0% to -10.7%). The results of secondary endpoints will be presented. The safety and tolerability profile for BAY 88-8223 were highly favorable and only 1 subject (2.0%) experienced lymphocyte count decreased as a Grade 4 adverse event, and there was no death during the study treatment and within 30 days after the last injection of study treatment. Conclusions: The reduction from baseline in total ALP at 12 weeks seen in this phase II study is consistent with the results shown in ALSYMPCA study. Overall, BAY 88-8223 was well tolerated in Japanese patients with CRPC and bone metastases. Clinical trial information: NCT01929655.

Download Full-text

Bone Targeting Agents in Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer: State of the Art

Cancers ◽

10.3390/cancers13030546 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 13 (3) ◽

pp. 546

Author(s):

Veronica Mollica ◽

Alessandro Rizzo ◽

Matteo Rosellini ◽

Andrea Marchetti ◽

Angela Dalia Ricci ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Prostate Cancer ◽

Cord Compression ◽

Abiraterone Acetate ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽

Castration Resistant ◽

Radium 223 ◽

Pathologic Fractures ◽

Phase Iii Trials ◽

Skeletal Related Events

Bone health represents a major issue in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients with bone metastases; in fact, the frequently prolonged use of hormonal agents causes important modifications in physiological bone turnover and most of these men will develop skeletal-related events (SREs), including spinal cord compression, pathologic fractures and need for surgery or radiation to bone, which are estimated to occur in almost half of this patient population. In the last decade, several novel therapeutic options have entered into clinical practice of bone metastatic CRPC, with recent approval of enzalutamide and abiraterone acetate, cabazitaxel chemotherapy and radium-223, on the basis of survival benefit suggested by landmark Phase III trials assessing these agents in this setting. Conversely, although bone-targeted agents (BTAs)—such as the bisphosphonate zoledronic acid and the receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B (RANK) ligand inhibitor denosumab—are approved for the prevention of SREs, these compounds have not shown benefit in terms of overall survival. However, emerging evidence has suggested that the combination of BTAs and abiraterone acetate, enzalutamide and the radiopharmaceutical radium-223 could result in improved clinical outcomes and prolonged survival in bone metastatic CRPC. In this review, we will provide an overview on bone tropism of prostate cancer and on the role of BTAs in metastatic hormone-sensitive and castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Download Full-text

A phase I/II study of combination olaparib and radium-223 in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with bone metastases (COMRADE): A trial in progress.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2021.39.6_suppl.tps182 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽

pp. TPS182-TPS182

Author(s):

Justin Shaya ◽

Wanling Xie ◽

Biren Saraiya ◽

Mamta Parikh ◽

Edmund Folefac ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Prostate Cancer ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Bone Metastases ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Parp Inhibitors ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽

Open Label ◽

Castration Resistant ◽

Radium 223

TPS182 Background: Radium-223 is an α-emitting radioisotope that induces DNA double-stranded breaks leading to cell death and has demonstrated improvement in overall survival in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) with bone metastases. PARP inhibitors, including olaparib and rucaparib, inhibit repair of DNA single-stranded beaks and have demonstrated clinical efficacy in mCRPC patients harboring alterations in the homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway. In extensive preclinical cancer models, PARP inhibitors have shown efficacy as radiosensitizing agents. We designed a phase 1/2 trial to test the clinical hypothesis that the combination of radium-223 with olaparib will demonstrate anti-tumor activity in patients with mCRPC irrespective of underlying HRR deficiency status. Methods: This is an open label, multi-center, phase 1/2 study (NCT03317392) evaluating the dosing, safety and efficacy of olaparib in combination with radium-223 in men with mCRPC with bone metastases. Patient must have 2 or more bone metastases and at least 1 bone metastasis that has not been treated with prior radiation therapy. Key exclusion criteria include the presence of visceral metastases or malignant lymphadenopathy exceeding 4 cm and prior therapy with radium-223 and/or PARP inhibitors. The phase 1 component of the study uses a 3+3 dose escalation design to determine the recommended phase 2 dose of olaparib in combination with standard of care dosing of Radium-223. The primary endpoint of the phase 1 component is safety. The phase 2 component of the study is an open-label, randomized study evaluating the combination of olaparib and radium-223 compared to radium-223 alone. The primary endpoint of the phase 2 component is radiographic progression-free survival as defined by Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 guidelines for bone metastases and RECIST v1.1 for non-bone metastases. Secondary endpoints include time to PSA progression, PSA response, time to subsequent therapy, time to first skeletal event, overall survival, and safety. Exploratory endpoints include stratification of response based on HRR alterations, whole exome sequencing of plasma cell free DNA both at baseline, on treatment, and at progression, and evaluation of changes in the tumor immune microenvironment with therapy. As of October 1, 2020, the phase 1 component has completed accrual and we anticipate opening the phase 2 component by December 2020. Clinical trial information: NCT03317392.

Download Full-text

223P Overall survival (OS) results of phase III ARAMIS study of darolutamide (DARO) added to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC)

Annals of Oncology ◽

10.1016/j.annonc.2020.10.443 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 31 ◽

pp. S1328

Author(s):

K. Fizazi ◽

N.D. Shore ◽

T.L.J. Tammela ◽

A. Ulys ◽

E. Vjaters ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Prostate Cancer ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Androgen Deprivation Therapy ◽

Androgen Deprivation ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽

Castration Resistant

Download Full-text

Decreased fracture rate by mandating bone protecting agents in the EORTC 1333/PEACEIII trial combining Ra223 with enzalutamide versus enzalutamide alone: An updated safety analysis.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.5002 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 5002-5002

Author(s):

Silke Gillessen ◽

Ananya Choudhury ◽

Alejo Rodriguez-Vida ◽

Franco Nole ◽

Enrique Gallardo Diaz ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Prostate Cancer ◽

Safety Analysis ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Fracture Rate ◽

Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽

Continuous Administration ◽

Castration Resistant ◽

Radium 223 ◽

Safety Population

5002 Background: The randomized phase III EORTC-1333-GUCG (NCT02194842) trial compares enzalutamide vs. a combination of Radium 223 and enzalutamide in asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. The premature unblinding of ERA223 (NCT02043678) in Nov 2017 due to a significant increase in the rate of fractures in the combination of abiraterone and Ra223 arm led to the implementation of the mandatory use of bone protecting agents (BPA) in the EORTC-1333-GUCG trial. Skeletal fractures, pathological or not, are a frequent and underestimated adverse event of systemic treatment of advanced prostate cancer. Whether this mandated use of BPA (zoledronic acid or denosumab) would mitigate the risk of fractures in this patient population was unclear. An early safety analysis (Tombal, ASCO, 2019) suggested that the risk of fractures was well controlled in both arms when patients receive BPA. We present here an updated analysis of fracture incidence with longer follow-up. Methods: As of 28/01/2021, a total of 253 patients (134 after making BPA mandatory) were randomized between enzalutamide/Ra223 and enzalutamide. The fracture rate was estimated with the cumulative incidence method in the safety population of 237 (122 after making BPA mandatory) treated patients. Death in absence of fracture was analyzed as competing risk and censoring was applied at last follow-up. Results: Overall, 69.5% of enzalutamide/Ra223 patients (95.2% after making BPA mandatory) and 73.1% of enzalutamide patients (95% after making BPA mandatory) received BPA on treatment: 13.6% in the enzalutamide/Ra223 arm and 21.8% in the enzalutamide arm did not use BPA at registration, but started during protocol treatment and 55.9% and 51.3% respectively, received BPA since entry. At 36.7 months median follow-up in patients without BPA and 23.1 months median follow-up in patients receiving BPA, a total of 39 patients reported a fracture. Among them, 30 patients (20 in enzalutamide/Ra223 arm) did not receive BPA and 9 (4 in the enzalutamide/Ra223 arm) received BPA (see table). Conclusions: The updated safety analysis confirms the early fracture rate results. In the absence of BPA, the risk of fracture is increased when RA223 is added to enzalutamide. Strikingly, in both arms, the risk remains almost abolished by a preventive continuous administration of BPA, thus stressing the importance of complying to international recommendations in terms of giving BPA to mCRPC patients. This study is sponsored by EORTC and supported by Bayer and Astellas. Clinical trial information: NCT02194842. [Table: see text]

Download Full-text