Risk of Prolapse Recurrence after Native Tissue Anterior Vaginal Suspension Procedure with Intermediate to Long-Term Followup

2016 ◽  
Vol 195 (4 Part 1) ◽  
pp. 1014-1020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca S. Lavelle ◽  
Alana L. Christie ◽  
Feras Alhalabi ◽  
Philippe E. Zimmern
Keyword(s):  
Native Tissue ◽  
Prolapse Recurrence ◽  
Vaginal Suspension

Long-term pelvic organ prolapse recurrence and mesh exposure following sacrocolpopexy

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (9) ◽  
pp. 1763-1770 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tonya N. Thomas ◽  
Emily R. W. Davidson ◽  
Erika J. Lampert ◽  
Marie F. R. Paraiso ◽  
Cecile A. Ferrando
Keyword(s):  
Pelvic Organ Prolapse ◽  
Pelvic Organ ◽  
Mesh Exposure ◽  
Prolapse Recurrence

scholarly journals Long-term follow-up after native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse

2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sissel H. Oversand ◽  
Anne Cathrine Staff ◽  
Anny E. Spydslaug ◽  
Rune Svenningsen ◽  
Ellen Borstad
Keyword(s):  
Pelvic Organ Prolapse ◽  
Tissue Repair ◽  
Pelvic Organ ◽  
Native Tissue Repair ◽  
Native Tissue ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Long-term results of prolapse recurrence and functional outcome after vaginal hysterectomy

2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa T. Prodigalidad ◽  
Yoav Peled ◽  
Stuart L. Stanton ◽  
Haim Krissi
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Vaginal Hysterectomy ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Prolapse Recurrence

scholarly journals Serious complications and recurrences after pelvic organ prolapse surgery for 2309 women in the VIGI-MESH registry

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xavier Fritel ◽  
Renaud de Tayrac ◽  
Joe de Keizer ◽  
Sandrine Campagne-Loiseau ◽  
Michel Cosson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pelvic Organ Prolapse ◽  
Pelvic Organ ◽  
Transvaginal Mesh ◽  
Vaginal Repair ◽  
Mesh Placement ◽  
Native Tissue ◽  
Prolapse Recurrence ◽  
Pop Surgery ◽  
Laparoscopic Sacropexy ◽  
One Year

Objective: To assess the incidence of serious complications and reoperations for recurrence after pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery and compare the three most common types of repair. Design: Prospective cohort study using a registry. Setting: 19 surgical centres in France. Population: 2309 women participated between 2017 and 2019. Methods: a multivariate analysis including an inverse probability of treatment weighting approach was used to obtain three comparable groups. Main outcome measures: Serious complications and subsequent reoperations for POP recurrence Results: Mean follow-up was 16.6 months. Surgeries included in the analysis were native tissue vaginal repair (N=504), transvaginal mesh placement (692), and laparoscopic sacropexy with mesh (1113). Serious complications occurred among 52 women (2.3%), and reoperation for recurrence was required for 32 (1.4%). At one year, the cumulative weighted incidence of serious complications was 1.8% for native tissue vaginal repair (95% confidence interval 0-3.9), 3.9% for transvaginal mesh (2.0-5.9), and 2.2% for sacropexy (1.1-2.6). Compared with the native tissue vaginal repair group, the risk of serious complications was higher in the transvaginal mesh group (weighted-HR 3.84, 2.43-6.08), and the sacropexy group (2.48, 1.45-4.23), while the risk of reoperation for prolapse recurrence was reduced in both groups (transvaginal mesh [0.22, 0.13-0.39] and sacropexy [0.29, 0.18-0.47]). Conclusions: Laparoscopic sacropexy with mesh appears to have a better risk profile (few serious complications and few reoperations for recurrence) than transvaginal mesh placement (more serious complications) and native tissue vaginal repair (more reoperations for recurrence). These results are useful for informing women and for shared decision making.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document