scholarly journals Methodology Using Pharmacy And Medical Claims Data To Evaluate Real-World Outcomes And Costs Of Ivf Treatment In The Us

2015 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. A16
Author(s):  
F.A. Corvino ◽  
A. Surinach ◽  
J.C. Locklear ◽  
A.M. Howe ◽  
B. Hayward ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Monica R Shah ◽  
Tanya F Partridge ◽  
Xiaoqing Xue ◽  
Justin L Gregg

Introduction: Regional studies have reported a decline in cardiovascular (CV) hospitalizations and procedures with the onset of the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Factors may include patient reluctance to seek care and de-prioritization of approvals for CV admissions by hospitals. We wanted to assess these observations at a national level. Hypothesis: To examine national trends in CV hospitalizations for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), unstable angina (USA), and heart failure (HF), as well as left heart catheterizations (LHC), using US medical claims data. Methods: We interrogated IQVIA US Claims data, a verified source, from Jan 2019 to May 2020 (214 million patients; 76% private insurance claims, 19% Medicare claims, 5% Medicaid claims). Since confirmed COVID-19 cases in the US began rising in Mar 2020, this was used as reference point to identify cohorts for comparison. Trends in volumes of hospitalizations for key CV events (AMI, USA, and HF) and LHC were compared from Mar 1 to May 8, 2020 to the equivalent time period in 2019. We used a Bayesian hierarchical model to assess trends. Results: From Mar to May 2020, compared to 2019, there were significantly fewer hospitalizations for: key CV events (1,110,492 vs. 1,487,558; p=0.0016); AMI (277,615 vs. 412,235; p=0.0002); USA (1,007 vs. 1,688, p=0.1245); and, HF (831,870 vs. 1,073,635; p=0.0036). There were significantly fewer LHC (118,393 vs. 221,701; p=0.0002). As shown in the Figure, there was a significant decline in CV hospitalizations in 2020 compared to 2019. Conclusions: During the COVID-19 pandemic, CV hospitalizations have declined significantly in the US. We observed an ~25% drop in CV hospitalizations and an ~50% drop in LHC. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first national evaluation of trends in CV care during COVID-19 and validate concerns that acute CV care in the US has been delayed or deferred, potentially foreshadowing a surge of CV complications in the future.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. e102429 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cécile Viboud ◽  
Vivek Charu ◽  
Donald Olson ◽  
Sébastien Ballesteros ◽  
Julia Gog ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 202-202
Author(s):  
Karynsa Cetin ◽  
Jeffrey Wasser ◽  
Sally Wettten ◽  
Ivy Altomare

Abstract Background: ITP is a rare disorder characterized by low platelet counts and an increased tendency to bleed. The goal of ITP therapy is to treat or prevent bleeding. In ITP therapy trials, ethical considerations require that any patient determined to be at imminent risk of bleeding is treated with any therapy necessary to reduce this risk (“rescue therapy”). Therefore, BREs reported in this setting may not reflect true bleeding rates. Understanding the frequency of both actual bleeding events and/or use of rescue therapy in routine clinical practice could provide additional insights on the real-world burden of this disease. Methods: Based on administrative medical claims from the MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters and Medicare Supplemental and Coordination of Benefits Databases in the US, we identified adults diagnosed with primary ITP between 01/01/2008 and 12/31/2012. BREs were defined as ≥1 actual bleeding event (of any severity) and/or rescue therapy use (platelet transfusion, intravenous immunoglobulin [IVIg], anti-D, or IV steroids). The rate of BREs (per person per year) was calculated for the ITP cohort overall and by ITP phase (newly diagnosed: 0 to <3 months; persistent: 3-12 months; and chronic: >12 months) and splenectomy status. Patients were followed from ITP diagnosis until death, disenrollment from the health plan, or 06/30/2013, whichever came first. Results: Of approximately 67 million adults in the database, we identified 6,651 adults with primary ITP followed for 13,046 person-years (mean age: 52.4 years; 59% female). During follow-up, 3,768 patients (57%) experienced at least one BRE, translating into a rate of 1.08 BREs per person per year (95% CI: 1.06-1.10). Of the total 14,115 BREs, 41% contained bleeding events only; 58% contained rescue therapy only, and 2% contained both. The most common bleeding types were: gastrointestinal hemorrhage, hematuria, epistaxis, and ecchymoses. Intracranial hemorrhage was reported in 74 patients (1.1%). Newly diagnosed and splenectomized patients had higher BRE rates (Table). Conclusions: We provide current real-world estimates of BRE rates in adults with primary ITP. In our study, the majority of ITP patients experienced at least one BRE, and over half of all BREs were defined by rescue therapy use alone. This demonstrates the importance of examining both bleeding and rescue therapy use to fully assess disease burden and ultimately help determine the relative success of different ITP therapies. Abstract 202. Table 1 BREs with bleeding only BREs with rescue therapy use only BREs with both bleeding and rescue therapy All BREs Count Rate per person per year (95% CI) Count Rate per person per year (95% CI) Count Rate per person per year (95% CI) Count Rate per person per year (95% CI) Newly diagnosed ITP 2,059 1.29 (1.24-1.35) 2,063 1.30 (1.24-1.35) 126 0.08 (0.07-0.09) 4,248 2.67 (2.59-2.75) Persistent ITP 1,678 0.40 (0.38-0.42) 2,805 0.66 (0.64-0.69) 79 0.02 (0.01-0.02) 4,562 1.08 (1.05-1.11) Chronic ITP 1,984 0.27 (0.26-0.29) 3,272 0.45 (0.44-0.47) 49 0.01 (0.01-0.01) 5,305 0.73 (0.71-0.75) Splenectomized 347 0.42 (0.37-0.46) 618 0.74 (0.69-0.80) 5 0.01 (0.00-0.01) 970 1.17 (1.09-1.24) Non-splenectomized 5,374 0.44 (0.43-0.45) 7,522 0.62 (0.60-0.63) 249 0.02 (0.02-0.02) 13,145 1.08 (1.06-1.09) Overall 5,721 0.44 (0.43-0.45) 8,140 0.62 (0.61-0.64) 254 0.02 (0.02-0.02) 14,115 1.08 (1.06-1.10) Disclosures Cetin: Amgen: Employment. Wasser:Amgen: Consultancy. Wettten:Amgen: Employment. Altomare:Amgen: Consultancy.


Vaccine ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (50) ◽  
pp. 5983-5988 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynthia Schuck-Paim ◽  
Robert Taylor ◽  
David Lindley ◽  
Keith P. Klugman ◽  
Lone Simonsen

2016 ◽  
Vol 137 (2) ◽  
pp. AB242
Author(s):  
Susan Gabriel ◽  
Meryl Mendelson ◽  
Alexander J. Gillespie ◽  
Ben Hoskin

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document