scholarly journals Use of Real-World Evidence in US Payer Coverage Decision-Making for Next-Generation Sequencing–Based Tests: Challenges, Opportunities, and Potential Solutions

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 540-550 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia A. Deverka ◽  
Michael P. Douglas ◽  
Kathryn A. Phillips
2020 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. S405-S406
Author(s):  
J. Polivka ◽  
M. Svajdler ◽  
V. Priban ◽  
P. Martinek ◽  
N. Ptakova ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. jclinpath-2020-206570
Author(s):  
Olga Michail ◽  
Patrick McCallion ◽  
Julie McGimpsey ◽  
Andrew Hindley ◽  
Graeme Greenfield ◽  
...  

Essential thrombocythaemia (ET) is driven by somatic mutations involving the JAK2, CALR and MPL genes. Approximately 10% of patients lack driver mutations and are referred as ‘triple-negative’ ET (TN-ET). The diagnosis of TN-ET, however, relies on bone marrow examination that is not always performed in routine practice, and thus in the real-world setting, there are a group of cases with suspected TN-myeloproliferativeneoplasm.In this real-world cohort, patients with suspected TN-ET were initially rescreened for JAK2, CALR and MPL and then targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) was applied.The 35 patients with suspected TN-ET had a median age at diagnosis of 43 years (range 16–79) and a follow-up of 10 years (range 2–28). The median platelet count was 758×109/L (range 479–2903). Thrombosis prior to and following diagnosis was noted in 20% and 17% of patients. Six patients were JAK2V617F and two patients were CALR positive on repeat screening. NGS results showed that 24 of 27 patients harboured no mutations. Four mutations were noted in three patients.There was no evidence of clonality for the majority of patients with suspected TN-ET with targeted NGS analysis. Detection of driver mutations in those who were previously screened suggests that regular rescreening is required. This study also questions the diagnosis of TN-ET without the existence of a clonal marker.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1297-1311
Author(s):  
Emma G. Sturgill ◽  
Amanda Misch ◽  
Rebecca Lachs ◽  
Carissa C. Jones ◽  
Dan Schlauch ◽  
...  

PURPOSE Molecular biomarkers informing disease diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment decisions in patients with breast cancer are being uncovered by next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies. In this study, we survey how NGS is used for patients with breast cancer in real-world settings with a focus on physician behaviors and sequencing results. METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with breast cancer who received NGS testing from commercial vendors as part of standard of care from 2014 to 2019. A total of 2,635 NGS reports from 2,316 unique breast cancer patients were assessed. Hormone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 statuses were abstracted from patient medical records. Comparative gene amplification and mutation frequencies were analyzed using Pearson's correlation and Lin's concordance statistics. RESULTS The number of physicians ordering NGS tests for patients with breast cancer increased more than six-fold from 2014 to 2019. Tissue- and plasma-based tests were ordered roughly equally by 2019, with plasma-based testing ordered most frequently in hormone receptor–positive subtypes. Patients with triple-negative breast cancer were most likely to receive NGS testing. Gene amplifications including ERBB2 were detected less frequently in our real-world data set as compared to previous genomic landscape studies, whereas the opposite was true for gene mutations including ESR1. Pathogenic mutations in the PI3K pathway (38.6%) and DNA damage repair pathway (11.0%) were frequently reported. Alterations were also reported across other cellular pathways. CONCLUSION Overall, we found that an increasing number of physicians in community settings are adopting NGS in the care of patients with breast cancer. Discrepancies between our real-world NGS data and previous genomic landscape studies are likely owed to the prevalence of plasma-based testing in community oncology clinics, as the reference data were from tissue-based NGS alone.


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. S1157
Author(s):  
J.N. Minatta ◽  
Y. Ferreira ◽  
A. Antivero ◽  
J. Pandolfi ◽  
H. Garcia Rivello ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document