scholarly journals Does Endovascular Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Confer Survival Benefits over Open Repair?

2011 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 920
Author(s):  
Naveed U. Saqib ◽  
Sun C. Park ◽  
Taeyoung Park ◽  
Robert Y. Rhee ◽  
Rabih A. Chaer ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Vol 53 (6) ◽  
pp. 40S-41S
Author(s):  
Naveed U. Saqib ◽  
Taeyoung Park ◽  
Sun C. Park ◽  
Robert Rhee ◽  
Rabih A. Chaer ◽  
...  

Vascular ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dipankar Mukherjee ◽  
Tarek M Waked

Endovascular repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm has demonstrated superior results when compared with open repair and will likely become the standard of care when the anatomy of the aneurysm is appropriate for endovascular repair.


Vascular ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 231-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hilin Yildirim ◽  
Guus W van Lammeren ◽  
Çagdas Ünlü ◽  
Eric P van Dongen ◽  
Rob HW van de Mortel ◽  
...  

Objectives To evaluate long-term outcome and quality of life after open and endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. Methods All consecutive ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm patients at the St. Antonius Hospital treated for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm between January 2005 and January 2015 were included. Mortality, morbidity, and re-interventions within 30 days and during follow-up were registered. Quality of life was measured with Short Form-36 questionnaire among survivors. Additional subgroup analysis between open repair and endovascular repair was performed. Results A total of 192 patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm were included: 76.6% (147/192) underwent open repair and 23.4% (45/192) endovascular repair. All-cause 30-day mortality rate was 31.3% (60/192), and 30-day morbidity rate was 70.3% (135/192). Median stay at the intensive care unit was two days for endovascular repair and four days for open repair ( p = 0.002). No other statistically significant differences between endovascular repair and open repair were observed. After a mean follow-up period of 62 months (range 9–126), 72.4% (76/105) of the responders had equivalent Short Form-36 scores as compared to the age-matched general Dutch population, and 84.2% (64/76) of the responders would choose surgery again if they would have a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Conclusions Survivors of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm have similar long-term quality of life scores compared to the age-matched general population. The majority of all survivors would choose to undergo acute abdominal aortic aneurysm repair again.


2012 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 614-619 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naveed Saqib ◽  
Sun Cheol Park ◽  
Taeyoung Park ◽  
Robert Y. Rhee ◽  
Rabih A. Chaer ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. 1091-1105 ◽  
Author(s):  
George A. Antoniou ◽  
George S. Georgiadis ◽  
Stavros A. Antoniou ◽  
Polyvios Pavlidis ◽  
Dimitrios Maras ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document