Short-term and long-term safety and tolerability of interferon β-1b in multiple sclerosis

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 294-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony T. Reder ◽  
Joel F. Oger ◽  
Ludwig Kappos ◽  
Paul O’Connor ◽  
Mark Rametta
EBioMedicine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 49 ◽  
pp. 269-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuan Feng ◽  
Riyue Bao ◽  
Lei Li ◽  
Florian Deisenhammer ◽  
Barry G.W. Arnason ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-40
Author(s):  
Justyna Wiśniowska ◽  
◽  
Kamilla Puławska ◽  

Fatigue is one of the most common symptoms seen in patients with multiple sclerosis. Cognitive-behavioural psychotherapy can be a non-pharmacological approach for these patients. Van Kessel and Moss-Morris developed a cognitive-behavioural model to explain multiple sclerosis-related fatigue (2006). According to this model, inflammatory and demyelinating factors present in the central nervous system trigger fatigue, while cognitive interpretation, anxiety, or depressive symptoms and resting lifestyle are maintaining factors. Based on the cognitive-behavioural model of fatigue in multiple sclerosis, a protocol encompassing 8 treatment sessions was developed. For over 10 years, studies have been conducted to verify the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioural psychotherapy in the treatment of fatigue in patients with multiple sclerosis. The so far obtained results show that cognitive-behavioural psychotherapy has a moderate short-term effect on reducing fatigue, while the effect size in the long-term is small. The obtained results were undoubtedly influenced by several factors: the heterogeneity of the procedures used, the size of the research groups, and the large number of disease-related intermediary variables. Further research should be conducted to identify specific factors responsible for the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioural psychotherapy in the treatment of fatigue and to assess the long-term effects of therapy.


2013 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kensuke Ikeda ◽  
Tomoko Okamoto ◽  
Takashi Yamamura ◽  
Isao Ohsawa ◽  
Rie Furutera ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (11) ◽  
pp. 1038-1040 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Teh ◽  
Patrick Russell ◽  
Jordan Li ◽  
Udul Hewage

2000 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 321-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Rotondi ◽  
G. Mazziotti ◽  
B. Biondi ◽  
G. Manganella ◽  
A. Del Buono ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 354 (1390) ◽  
pp. 1711-1720 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil Scoldingf

Spontaneous myelin repair in multiple sclerosis (MS) provides a striking example of the brain's inherent capacity for sustained and stable regenerative tissue repair—but also clearly emphasizes the limitations of this capacity; remyelination ultimately fails widely in many patients, and disability and handicap accumulate. The observation of endogenous partial myelin repair has raised the possibility that therapeutic interventions designed to supplement or promote remyelination might have a useful and significant impact both in the short term, in restoring conduction, and in the long term, in safeguarding axons. Therapeutic remyelination interventions must involve manipulations to either the molecular or the cellular environment within lesions; both depend crucially on a detailed understanding of the biology of the repair process and of those glia implicated in spontaneous repair, or capable of contributing to exogenous repair. Here we explore the biology of myelin repair in MS, examining the glia responsible for successful remyelination, oligodendrocytes and Schwann cells, their ‘target’ cells, neurons and the roles of astrocytes. Options for therapeutic remyelinating strategies are reviewed, including glial cell transplantation and treatment with growth factors or other soluble molecules. Clinical aspects of remyelination therapies are considered—which patients, which lesions, which stage of the disease, and how to monitor an int–ervention—and the remaining obstacles and hazards to these approaches are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document