Refractive Error and Visual Impairment in School-Age Children in Gombak District, Malaysia

Ophthalmology ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 112 (4) ◽  
pp. 678-685 ◽  
Author(s):  
P GOH ◽  
Y ABQARIYAH ◽  
G POKHAREL ◽  
L ELLWEIN
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grace Obumneke Ogbonna

Abstract Introduction Refractive error is one of the major causes of blurred vision. It is a common eye disorder even in children. The World Health Organization had estimated refractive error to cause visual impairment to about 153 million people around the world with over 1.4 million children affected. Eighty percent (80%) of whom live in developing countries. The right to sight, a global initiative launched by World Health Organization, has the main aim of eliminating avoidable visual impairment and blindness at a global level. In order to achieve this goal, visual screening in pre-school and school children has long been a tradition in developed nations of the world. The significance of this cannot be overemphasized, especially with the already established correlation between school performance and visual status. However, in developing countries visual screening for children is not yet well established, thereby leaving many children with undetected refractive error, which could result in visual impairment. This study was aimed at evaluating the prevalence of refractive error among early primary school age children at Ado-Odo Ota Local Government Area(LGA) in Ogun State, Nigeria. Methodology: The study was designed as a cross-sectional study. It employed a multi-staged sampling method to recruit 205 pupils aged 5-9 years attending schools in Ado-Odo Ota as study participants to determine the prevalence of refractive error among the pupils attending primary schools in this area. Following ocular pathology screening for the children, subjects found fit were refracted both objectively and subjectively using auto-refractor and trial lenses respectively. Result: A prevalence of 30.73% of refractive error was recorded. Myopia had the highest prevalence (24.88%), followed by astigmatism 3.42% and hyperopia with the least prevalence of 2.44%. Older children had higher frequencies of refractive error than the younger ones with the males having more refractive error than the females (19.51% and 11.22%) respectively. Conclusion: The study concluded that refractive error is significantly present among this population and recommended that parents should ensure that their children are screened for refractive error, and that government should introduce school health programs to curb the growing menace of visual impairment due to uncorrected refractive error.


2002 ◽  
Vol 134 (5) ◽  
pp. 735-743 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jialiang Zhao ◽  
Jin Mao ◽  
Rong Luo ◽  
Fengrong Li ◽  
Sergio R Munoz ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol Volume 11 ◽  
pp. 135-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yosef Antehun Merrie ◽  
Mulusew Mulusew Tegegne ◽  
Minychil Bantihun Munaw ◽  
Haile Woretaw Alemu

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qian Fan ◽  
Hongxia Wang ◽  
Wenjun Kong ◽  
Wei Zhang ◽  
Zhouyue Li ◽  
...  

This study aimed to review the consequences of increased online learning, which was precipitated by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), on visual function, as well as the methods for preventing the associated visual impairment. The recent finding implies that a higher incidence of myopia may be observed during the pandemic than that before. The myopia prevalence was 59.35% in COVID-19, which was higher than that in the normal period. COVID-19-related influence of developing myopia among students should be addressed and under control. Online learning precipitated by COVID-19 is likely to increase the global burden of visual function impairment. This review highlighted useful measures to prevent online learning-related visual function impairments, including the following: (1) desktop illumination of no >300 lx, online learning time for primary, and middle-school students of no more than 20–30 min per session; (2) daily video time for preschool children not exceeding 1 h, and for school-age children and adolescents not exceeding 2 h; (3) after every 30–40 min of online learning, moving eyes away from the screen or closed for 10 min; (4) engaging in outdoor activities for ≥ 2 h a day; (5) suitable screen and learning environment settings and correct postures for reading and writing; (6) sufficient sleep and proper nutrition. Preventing online learning-related visual impairment during and after this unprecedented pandemic will facilitate future ophthalmic practice.


2006 ◽  
pp. 223-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. B. Hall ◽  
David Elliman

Chapter 12 describes defects likely to cause disabling impairment of vision, defines the terms used to describe the common disorders such as squint, refractive error, and amblyopia, reviews the tests and procedures used for assessing vision in pre-school and school-age children, sets out the arguments for screening, gives a brief account of colour vision defects and vision problems associated with ‘dyslexia’, and makes recommendations for screening and early detection.


2019 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Uchenna C. Atowa ◽  
Rekha Hansraj ◽  
Samuel O. Wajuihian

Background: Refractive errors are common eye disorders and are leading causes of visual impairment in the general population. Children with uncorrected refractive error may experience reduced visual acuity, transient blurring, headache and persistent ocular discomforts particularly for close work which can impair reading efficiency and school performance.Aim: This article documents the prevalence of refractive errors in school-age children of different ethnic origins. The goal is to identify possible variation in measuring techniques and diagnostic criteria, as well as limitations of studies, to provide a clear direction for future studies.Methods: The review was undertaken through a detailed evaluation of peer-reviewed publications of primary research on this topic. The keywords for the search included ‘refractive error’, ‘hyperopia’, ‘myopia’, ‘astigmatism’ and ‘school children’. Only epidemiological studies with participants between 5 and 18 years of age were included.Results: Although several population and school-based studies have been conducted in various racial groups and populations, their findings were diverse owing to inconsistencies in the methods applied in identifying children in need of refraction, measurement techniques and diagnostic criteria for refractive errors. There are also some limitations associated with the sampling design and characteristics, which may have influenced the outcome measures.Conclusion: Despite the problems inherent in the studies, the review indicates that refractive error in school-age children is a public health concern in those populations and warrants additional research that will provide reliable data for proper planning of intervention strategies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document