66Continuous epidural postoperative analgesia in major orthopedic surgery: comparison of ropivacaine with ropivacaine – morphine

2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 24-24
Author(s):  
A TSIROGIANNI ◽  
A MAKRIS ◽  
S PAPANIKOLAOU ◽  
A NIKOLOPOULOS ◽  
P BATIANI
2000 ◽  
Vol 93 (2) ◽  
pp. 395-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anton G. L. Burm ◽  
Rudolf Stienstra ◽  
Rolf P. Brouwer ◽  
Britt-Marie Emanuelsson ◽  
Jack W. van Kleef

Background Changing plasma protein concentrations may affect the protein binding and pharmacokinetics of drugs in the postoperative phase. Therefore, the authors evaluated the pharmacokinetics of ropivacaine, administered by 72-h epidural infusion to provide postoperative analgesia. Methods Twenty-eight patients, scheduled for major orthopedic surgery during combined epidural and general anesthesia received a bolus dose of ropivacaine (50 or 75 mg), followed by constant-rate (10 ml/h) epidural infusion of ropivacaine 2 mg/ml (group 1) or 3 mg/ml (group 2). Total and unbound plasma concentrations of ropivacaine and pipecoloxylidide and plasma concentrations of alpha1-acid glycoprotein were determined. In addition, the urinary excretion of ropivacaine and major metabolites was measured. Results Total plasma concentrations of ropivacaine increased steadily during the infusion, reaching 2.7 +/- 0.7 and 2.9 +/- 0.5 mg/l in groups 1 and 2 after 72 h constant-rate infusion. Unbound ropivacaine concentrations reached average steady state levels of approximately 0.06 and 0.07 mg/l. Total and unbound concentrations of pipecoloxylidide increased to 1.0 +/- 0.4 and 0.4 +/- 0.2 mg/l (group 1) and 1.2 +/- 0.4 and 0.5 +/- 0.1 mg/l (group 2) after 72 h infusion. alpha1-Acid glycoprotein concentrations initially decreased, but thereafter increased steadily to approximately twice the baseline values. Conclusions Postoperative increases in plasma alpha1-acid glycoprotein concentrations enhance the protein binding of ropivacaine and pipecoloxylidide, causing divergence of total and unbound plasma concentrations.


1999 ◽  
Vol 82 (08) ◽  
pp. 918-924 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.D. Hull ◽  
G.F Pineo

IntroductionMajor orthopedic surgery, particularly total joint replacement or hip fracture, represents a high risk of future development of postoperative venous thromboembolism and warrants the routine use of prophylaxis with either mechanical devices or pharmacological agents. The aim of prophylaxis is to prevent fatal pulmonary embolism (PE) and the morbidity of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), particularly the development of post-thrombotic syndrome. Patterns of clinical practice, with respect to the prevention of venous thromboembolism and the appropriate use of anticoagulants for the treatment of thrombotic disease, have been strongly influenced by recent consensus conferences.1,2 Rules of evidence for assessing the literature have been applied to all recommendations regarding the prevention and treatment of thrombotic disease. These results were extrapolated using evidence gleaned from major clinical disorders and are based only on nonrandomized clinical trials or case series.1-3 Data from a large number of Level I clinical trials in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery have provided answers to many of the questions regarding prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism. In this review, we will discuss the prevention of venous thromboembolism following orthopedic surgery and discuss some of the controversial issues where further studies are required.


2016 ◽  
Vol 103 (5) ◽  
pp. 560-566 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshio Yamaguchi ◽  
Hideo Wada ◽  
Shinichi Miyazaki ◽  
Masahiro Hasegawa ◽  
Hiroki Wakabayashi ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 1061-1071 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie N Melillo ◽  
James V Scanlon ◽  
Benjamin P Exter ◽  
Michael Steinberg ◽  
Courtney I Jarvis

2009 ◽  
pp. 249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karmel L. Tambunan ◽  
Errol U. Hutagalung ◽  
Lugyanti Sukrisman ◽  
Ifran Saleh ◽  
S. B. Gunawan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document