The impact of tobacco control policies on smoking among older adults: A longitudinal analysis of 10 European countries

2018 ◽  
Vol 66 ◽  
pp. S241
Author(s):  
J. Perelman ◽  
M. Serrano ◽  
J. Bodriesz ◽  
A.E. Kunst
Addiction ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 114 (6) ◽  
pp. 1076-1085 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel Serrano‐Alarcón ◽  
Anton E. Kunst ◽  
Jizzo R. Bosdriesz ◽  
Julian Perelman

2016 ◽  
pp. ntw210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yannan Hu ◽  
Frank J. van Lenthe ◽  
Stephen Platt ◽  
Jizzo R. Bosdriesz ◽  
Eero Lahelma ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 53 ◽  
pp. 58-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timo-Kolja Pförtner ◽  
Anne Hublet ◽  
Christina Warrer Schnohr ◽  
Katharina Rathmann ◽  
Irene Moor ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 498-498
Author(s):  
Manjing Gao ◽  
Chioun Lee ◽  
Soojin Park

Abstract Little is known about sociodemographic and macro-level predictors of “recalcitrant smoking,” defined as persistent smoking when one has developed a health condition that is likely caused by smoking. We aim to investigate the impact of gender, education, and tobacco control policies on recalcitrant smoking among older adults in Europe from 2006 through 2013. Data from 33,839 respondents—aged 50 years and older with a smoking history and at least one smoking-related health condition—were pooled from the 2006–07, 2011, and 2013 waves of three harmonized longitudinal studies on ageing (SHARE, ELSA, and TILDA). We fitted gender-specific logistic regression models with two-way fixed effects and tested interaction terms between gender, tobacco control policies, and education, adjusting for age, marital status, GDP per capita, smoking prevalence, country, and year-fixed effects. Compared to men and individuals with higher levels of education, women and less educated individuals were more likely to be recalcitrant smokers. The association between education and recalcitrant smoking was stronger for women than men. The inverse association between the TCS and recalcitrant smoking was stronger for those having upper secondary education (for men: OR = 0.905, CI = 0.849–0.965; for women: OR = 0.897, CI = 0.834–0.964) and tertiary education (for men: OR = 0.802, CI = 0.717–0.898; for women: OR = 0.739, CI = 0.603–0.907), compared to those having less than upper secondary. As women and less educated individuals are vulnerable to recalcitrant smoking, future policies targeting these marginalized groups are needed to prevent recalcitrant smoking in old age.


Addiction ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yiqun Wu ◽  
Zijing Wang ◽  
Yunting Zheng ◽  
Mengying Wang ◽  
Siyue Wang ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 248-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
M M Schaap ◽  
A E Kunst ◽  
M Leinsalu ◽  
E Regidor ◽  
O Ekholm ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. e025092 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoxin Xu ◽  
Xiulan Zhang ◽  
Teh Wei Hu ◽  
Leonard S Miller ◽  
Mengnan Xu

IntroductionChina consumes 44% of the world’s cigarettes. Robust tobacco control measures are needed to contain the trend of increasing cigarette consumption. This paper examines the effectiveness of policy interventions introduced in China on reducing the country’s tobacco use.MethodsThe paper uses data on China’s monthly cigarette consumption per capita from January 2000 to June 2017 to estimate the impact of specific policies on China’s tobacco consumption. Tobacco consumption is calculated from monthly sales data from the China National Tobacco Corporation and demographic data from the China National Bureau of Statistics. The policies studied include the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), national tobacco-related policy changes and two tobacco tax increases implemented in China during the study period. Segmented regression analysis is used to estimate the immediate effects of the policies studied and changes in the time trends resulted from these policy changes.FindingsThe impact of national policy changes in China is almost 20 times greater than the impact of the WHO FCTC treaty itself, and national policy changes in tobacco control are a determining factor in reversing the trend of increasing tobacco consumption in China. The 2015 tax increase, which raised retail cigarette prices, produced both immediate and trend effects, with a total incremental effect 7.8 times that of the 2009 tax increase, which did not result in higher cigarette prices for the consumer.InterpretationsTranslating global tobacco control policies into domestic policies will generate a much greater impact on reducing average cigarette consumption, and tobacco taxes that are reflected in the retail prices of cigarettes will be more effective in reducing cigarette consumption.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document