scholarly journals Using labelled internal standards to improve needle trap micro-extraction technique prior to gas chromatography/mass spectrometry

Talanta ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 200 ◽  
pp. 145-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denise Biagini ◽  
Tommaso Lomonaco ◽  
Silvia Ghimenti ◽  
Massimo Onor ◽  
Francesca G. Bellagambi ◽  
...  
1978 ◽  
Vol 24 (11) ◽  
pp. 2001-2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
F A Muskiet ◽  
D C Fremouw-Ottevangers ◽  
G T Nagel ◽  
B G Wolthers ◽  
J A de Vries

Abstract We report the determination of 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylpyruvic acid, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylmandelic acid, and 3,4-dihydroxyphenylethylene glycol in urine, by use of gas chromatography/mass spectrometry in combination with a simple purification method and deuterium-labeled internal standards. Normal excretion values in terms of creatinine, expressed as a function of age, are given, together with results obtained for patients with neuroblastoma, pheochromocytoma, or parkinsonism treated with L-DOPA + peripheral decarboxylase inhibitor, and for a patient receiving dopamine. We were unable to identify 3, 4-dihydroxyphenyllactic acid in urine. The results obtained and their relation to other catecholamine metabolites and catecholamine-precursor metabolites in urine are discussed.


2002 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 332-337 ◽  
Author(s):  
David K Crockett ◽  
Elizabeth L Frank ◽  
William L Roberts

Abstract Background: Widely used HPLC methods for quantification of metanephrine and normetanephrine in urine often have long analysis times and are frequently plagued by drug interferences. We describe a gas chromatography-mass spectrometry method designed to overcome these limitations. Methods: Metanephrine and normetanephrine conjugates were converted to unconjugated metanephrine and normetanephrine by acid hydrolysis. To avoid the rapid decomposition of the deuterated internal standards (metanephrine-d3 and normetanephrine-d3) under hydrolysis conditions, the internal standards were added after hydrolysis. Solid-phase extraction was used to isolate the hydrolyzed metanephrines from urine. Samples were concentrated by evaporation, then derivatized simultaneously with N-methyl-N-(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide and N-methyl-bis-heptafluoro-butryamide at room temperature. Results: The assay was linear from 25 to 7000 μg/L. The intraassay CVs were <5% and the interassay CVs <12%. Comparison with a routine HPLC method (n = 192) by Deming regression yielded a slope of 1.00 ± 0.02 μg/L, an intercept of −5.8 ± 7.8 μg/L, and Sy|x = 50.6 μg/L for metanephrine and a slope of 0.94 ± 0.03, intercept of 19 ± 11 μg/L, and Sy|x = 60 μg/L for normetanephrine. The correlation coefficients (r) were calculated after log transformation of the data and gave r = 0.97 for metanephrine and r = 0.97 for normetanephrine. Interference from common medications or drug metabolites was seen in <1% of samples. The time between sequential injections was <7 min. Conclusions: This new gas chromatography-mass spectrometry assay for total fractionated metanephrines is rapid, compares well with a standard HPLC assay, and avoids most drug interferences that commonly affect HPLC assays for urine metanephrines.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document