Lessons from IAVI-006, a Phase I clinical trial to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the pTHr.HIVA DNA and MVA.HIVA vaccines in a prime-boost strategy to induce HIV-1 specific T-cell responses in healthy volunteers

IntroductionFunctional cure has been proposed as an alternative to lifelong antiretroviral therapy and therapeutic vaccines represent one of the most promising approaches.Materials and MethodsWe conducted a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial to evaluate the safety, immunogenicity, and effect on viral dynamics of a therapeutic vaccine produced with monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MD-DC) loaded with a high dose of heat-inactivated autologous (HIA) HIV-1 in combination with pegylated interferon alpha 2a (IFNα-2a) in people with chronic HIV-1.ResultsTwenty-nine male individuals on successful ART and with CD4+ ≥450 cells/mm3 were randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive three ultrasound-guided inguinal intranodal immunizations, one every 2 weeks: (1) vaccine ~107 MD-DC pulsed with HIA-HIV-1 (1010 HIV RNA copies) (n = 8); (2) vaccine plus three doses of 180 mcg IFNα-2a at weeks 4–6 (n = 6); (3) placebo = saline (n = 7); and (4) placebo plus three doses of 180 mcg IFNα-2a (n = 8). Thereafter, treatment was interrupted (ATI). Vaccines, IFNα-2a, and the administration procedures were safe and well tolerated. All patients’ viral load rebounded during the 12-week ATI period. According to groups, changes in viral set-point between pre-ART and during ATI were not significant. When comparing all groups, there was a tendency in changes in viral set-point between the vaccine group vs. vaccine + IFNα-2a group (>0.5log10p = 0.05). HIV-1-specific T-cell responses (IFN-ƴ Elispot) were higher at baseline in placebo than in the vaccine group (2,259 ± 535 vs. 900 ± 200 SFC/106 PBMC, p = 0.028). A significant difference in the change of specific T-cell responses was only observed at week 4 between vaccine and placebo groups (694 ± 327 vs. 1,718 ± 282 SFC/106 PBMC, p = 0.04). No effect on T-cell responses or changes in viral reservoir were observed after INFα-2a administration.DiscussionResults from this study show that intranodally administered DC therapeutic vaccine in combination with IFNα-2a was safe and well-tolerated but had a minimal impact on viral dynamics in HIV-1 chronic infected participants.Clinical Trial Registration(www.ClinicalTrials.gov), identifier NCT02767193

Download Full-text

A phase I study of the safety and immunogenicity of a multi-peptide personalized genomic vaccine in the adjuvant treatment of solid tumors and hematological malignancies.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.e14307 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e14307-e14307

Author(s):

Ana Blazquez ◽

Alex Rubinsteyn ◽

Julia Kodysh ◽

John Patrick Finnigan ◽

Thomas Urban Marron ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trial ◽

T Cells ◽

T Cell ◽

Phase I ◽

Adjuvant Treatment ◽

Phase I Study ◽

Hematological Malignancies ◽

Ex Vivo ◽

T Cell Responses ◽

Cell Responses

e14307 Background: Mutation-derived tumor antigens (MTAs) arise as a direct result of somatic variations that occur during carcinogenesis and can be characterized via genetic sequencing and used to identify MTAs. We developed a platform for a fully-personalized MTA-based vaccine in the adjuvant treatment of solid and hematological malignancies. Methods: This is a single-arm, open label, proof-of-concept phase I study designed to test the safety and immunogenicity of Personalized Genomic Vaccine 001 (PGV001) that targets up to 10 predicted personal tumor neoantigens based on patient’s HLA profile (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02721043). Results: Patients who completed vaccination with PGV001_002 (head and neck squamous cell cancer) received 10 doses of vaccine comprising 10 long peptides (LP) combined with poly-ICLC (toll-like receptor-3 agonist) intradermally. Vaccine-induced T-cell responses were determined at weeks 0 and 27 (before and after treatment, respectively), ex vivo by interferon (IFN)-g enzyme-linked immunospot assay and after expansion by intracellular cytokine staining. Overlapping 15-mer peptides (OLPs) spanning the entirety of each LP and 9-10-mer peptides corresponding to each predicted class I epitope (Min) were pooled. Ex vivo responses to these peptide pools were undetectable at week 0 but were evident at week 27 against 2 OLPs out of 10 (20%) and in 5 Min out of 10 (50%). After in vitro expansion, neoantigen-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses were found in 5 out of 10 pooled peptides (50%). 7 out of 10 (70%) epitopes elicited polyfunctional T-cell responses (secretion of INF-g, TNF-a, and/or IL-2) from either CD4+ or CD8+ T cells. Conclusions: The PGV001 vaccine in our first patient showed both safety and immunogenicity, eliciting CD4+ and CD8+ responses to the vaccine peptides. As we enroll additional patients in this clinical trial, and perform deeper phenotyping of their tumor-reactive T cells, we will learn the determinants necessary for the successful generation of MTA-based vaccines, while informing future immunotherapeutic approaches and rational combinations. Clinical trial information: NCT02721043.

Download Full-text