Ammonia/flyash interactions and their impact on flue gas treatment technologies

1994 ◽  
Vol 49 (24) ◽  
pp. 4315-4325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jay R. Turner ◽  
Séverine Choné ◽  
Milorad P. Duduković
Author(s):  
Daniel Robertson ◽  
Stephen Burnley ◽  
Rod Barratt

All incineration and other thermal treatment technologies produce flue gas treatment residues (FGTR) that require specialised treatment and disposal. In the United Kingdom the FGTR arising from municipal solid waste incineration is classified as a hazardous (special) waste. This is primarily due to the irritant properties of chloride, but also due to the content of heavy metals. These wastes must be handled, transported & disposed of in accordance with the Special Waste Regulations 1996 and are disposed into highly engineered landfill sites, which isolate the material from the environment. The low levels of trace elements in the FGTR mean that the recycling of the metallic elements is not economic. Control through stabilisation and encapsulation in a crystalline matrix converts the FGTR primary form from a powder into solid block form. The use of a novel metal matrix encapsulation (MME) process allows low level engineering processes to be employed, increasing a range of reuse options combined with long-term improved storage.


Author(s):  
Boleslav Zach ◽  
Michal Šyc ◽  
Karel Svoboda ◽  
Michael Pohořelý ◽  
Radovan Šomplák ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 535-547 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryunosuke Kikuchi

A bench-scale test (800 Nm3/h) for electron beam treatment of flue gas was conducted. It was concluded that the method is favourable for treatment of flue gas with a high SO2 concentration (5,500 ppm) at low electron beam irradiation (5 kGy). Results are consistent with the claim that SOx is removed from flue gas by the reaction of SOx with ammonia, and the intermediate salts formed are oxidised by radicals to sulphate salts consisting mainly of ammonium sulphate (a N-fertiliser). A typical flue gas desulphurization (FGD) method such as the wet limestone process cannot remove NOx and SO3 effectively (Ando, 1990), but the electron beam process removes SO2, SO3 and NOx simultaneously without generating waste water and CO2.


1995 ◽  
Vol 46 (4-6) ◽  
pp. 1063-1066 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrzej G. Chmielewski ◽  
Edward Iller ◽  
Zbigniew Zimek ◽  
Micna Romanowski ◽  
Kazimierz Koperski

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document