Improving the Quality of Inpatient Ulcerative Colitis Management: Promoting Evidence-Based Practice and Reducing Care Variation

2017 ◽  
Vol 152 (5) ◽  
pp. S90-S91
Author(s):  
Ryan A. McConnell ◽  
Roshan Patel ◽  
Suzanne R. Sharpton ◽  
Fernando Velayos ◽  
Uma Mahadevan
2017 ◽  
Vol 153 (2) ◽  
pp. 586
Author(s):  
Ryan McConnell ◽  
Roshan Patel ◽  
Suzanne Sharpton ◽  
Fernando Velayos ◽  
Uma Mahadevan

Neonatology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 116 (3) ◽  
pp. 193-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger F. Soll ◽  
William McGuire

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 87
Author(s):  
Kaisa Bjuresäter ◽  
Sister Tessy Sebastian ◽  
Bhalchandra Kulkarni ◽  
Elsy Athlin

Introduction: This study is a part of a project aimed at implementing and evaluating the Collaborative Model of Best Practice, (CMBP) to promoting evidence-based practice (EBP) in health care contexts. The aim of the study was to assess nurses’ interest, attitudes, utilisation, and views on promotors of and resources related to EBP before and after taking part in the CMBP project, and to investigate their views on the CMBP in relation to collaboration between the academy and clinical practice, the earning environment, job satisfaction, and nursing quality.Methods: A descriptive, comparative design was used with pre- and post-test measurements. The Research Utilization Questionnaire (RUQ) and study-specific questions were distributed to ward nurses (n = 67) in a rural Indian hospital.Results: Most of the nurses thought that the CMBP had a positive impact on quality of care, on their attitudes to, interest in, and knowledge EBP, and on their job satisfaction. They also considered that the collaboration between the nursing college and clinical practice had a positive impact on the learning environment and that more resources were available at the end of the project.Conclusions: The CMBP project was an attempt to improve the quality of care for patients and the learning environment for nursing students and nurses on the project wards. The results indicated fulfilment of these goals, which strengthens the usability of the model. Implementation of EBP is challenging and requires long-lasting activities and comprehensive support from leaders and facilitators. More studies are needed in which EBP is systematically implemented, accomplished, evaluated, and reported.


2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela M. Lepkowski

School nurses contend with a variety of challenges related to collecting and using their own data. Seemingly small steps can be taken to overcome these challenges, which will result in significant improvements in data collection and use. Improving the quality of data collection assists school nurses to identify and define practice issues and guide implementation of evidence-based practice within their schools and districts. This article provides school nurses with practical steps to collect and use school or district specific health data.


2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 190-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonard Kaizer ◽  
Vicky Simanovski ◽  
Irene Blais ◽  
Carlin Lalonde ◽  
William K. Evans

Ontario is undergoing health system funding reform, which will transform the funding of selected clinical services to a patient-based approach anchored in evidence-based practice and quality of care. In support of this approach, a new systemic treatment funding model is being developed, with planned implementation on April 1, 2014.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Rachel Margaret Esson

<p>Introduction: Medical libraries very often base the decisions they make about library services on information gathered from user surveys. Is the quality of information obtained in this way sufficient to enable evidence-based practice? Aim: To determine what aspects of user survey design and presentation obtain the best response rates and therefore high external validity. Also to provide guidance for medical librarians who may wish to carry out user surveys. Methods: Library and information studies databases and Medline were searched to identify studies that reported the results of library user surveys that measured user perceptions of an existing library service or potential service. Studies that evaluated information skills training or clinical librarianship interventions were excluded as they have been looked in separate systematic reviews. Also studies that reported the results of LibQUAL or SERVQUAL were excluded. Results: 54 studies were included. The quality of the majority of the surveys was not clear as the reporting of the methodology of the user surveys was poor. However, it was determined that, as demonstrated in previous research, paper format surveys reported higher response rates than online-only surveys. It was not possible to extract any relevant data from the identified studies to draw any conclusions relating to presentation of the survey instrument. Conclusions: Unless survey methodology is reported in detail it is not possible to judge the quality of the evidence surveys contain. Good survey design is key to obtaining a good response rate and a good response rate means the results can be used for evidence-based practice. A Reporting Survey results Guideline (Resurge) is recommended to help improve the reporting quality of medical library survey research.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document