scholarly journals The ligand-binding domain of the cell surface receptor for urokinase-type plasminogen activator.

1991 ◽  
Vol 266 (12) ◽  
pp. 7842-7847
Author(s):  
N Behrendt ◽  
M Ploug ◽  
L Patthy ◽  
G Houen ◽  
F Blasi ◽  
...  
Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 2236-2236
Author(s):  
Rocco Romagnuolo ◽  
Michael B Boffa ◽  
Marlys L Koschinsky

Abstract Abstract 2236 Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] has been identified as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular diseases such as coronary heart disease. Lp(a) levels vary over 1000-fold within the human population and Lp(a) possesses both proatherogenic and prothrombotic properties due to the LDL-like moiety and apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] components, respectively. Apo(a) is highly homologous to plasminogen and thus can potentially interfere with plasminogen activation. Plasmin generated in the context of fibrin mediates the breakdown of blood clots, which are the causative factors in heart attacks and strokes. Plasmin generated on the surface of vascular cells plays a role in cell migration and proliferation, two of the fibroproliferative inflammatory events that underlie atherosclerosis. Previous studies have suggested that apo(a) may inhibit pericellular plasminogen activation on the basis of observations that apo(a) decreases plasminogen binding to cells. We have undertaken analysis of the mechanism by which apo(a) may interfere with pericellular plasminogen activation to allow for a more definitive description of the role of Lp(a) within the vasculature. Plasminogen activation was found to be markedly inhibited by the recombinant apo(a) variant 17K, in a dose dependent manner, on human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), human monocytic leukemia cells (THP-1), THP-1 macrophages, and smooth muscle cells. The strong lysine binding site in kringle IV type 10, as well as kringle V appear to be required for this effect since apo(a) variants lacking these elements (17KΔAsp and 17KΔV, respectively) failed to inhibit activation. However, the role of lysine-dependent binding of apo(a) itself to the cells is not clear. Carboxypeptidase treatment of cells did not decrease apo(a) binding, and apo(a) does not compete directly for plasminogen binding to the cells. Rather, apo(a) and plasminogen may bind to the cells as a complex. We next attempted to identify the cell-surface receptor(s) that mediate plasminogen activation on the cell surface as well as its inhibition by apo(a). Urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) has been previously shown to bind to urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA), vitronectin, and β3 integrins. uPAR is involved in the remodeling of the extracellular matrix (ECM) through regulation of plasminogen activation. We found evidence that uPAR is a potential receptor for both plasminogen and apo(a). Knockdown of uPAR in HUVECs results in decreased binding of plasminogen, 17K and, to a lesser extent, 17KΔAsp and 17KΔV. Similar experiments in SMCs revealed no changes in binding. A decrease in tPA-mediated plasminogen activation following uPAR knockdown occurred in HUVECs, and addition of 17K did not result in any further decrease. Overexpression of uPAR in THP-1 macrophages leads to greater than a two fold increase in 17K and plasminogen binding. Plasminogen activation increases over two-fold as a result of overexpression of uPAR, while 17K blunts the effect of uPAR overexpression. These results indicate that uPAR plays a crucial role in both plasminogen and apo(a) binding to the cell surface of specific cells and inhibition by apo(a) of plasminogen activation. Macrophage-1-antigen (Mac-1) receptor consists of CD11b (αM) and CD18 (β2) integrin and has been previously shown to recognize uPA and control migration and adhesion. Furthermore, αVβ3 has been previously shown to bind to vitronectin and the uPA-uPAR complex which promotes cell adhesion through binding of both vitronectin and αVβ3 integrins. We found that blocking the αM, β2, or αVβ3 receptors with monoclonal antibodies in THP-1 cells leads to a decrease in plasminogen activation, as well as a blunting of the inhibitory effects of apo(a) on plasminogen activation. These results indicate a role for Mac-1 and αVβ3 in apo(a) binding and inhibition of plasminogen activation. In conclusion, we have demonstrated, for the first time, the role of specific receptors in binding of apo(a) to vascular cell surfaces and in mediating the inhibitory effect of apo(a) on pericellular plasminogen activation. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


1999 ◽  
Vol 277 (3) ◽  
pp. L573-L579 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noboru Hattori ◽  
Thomas H. Sisson ◽  
Yin Xu ◽  
Tushar J. Desai ◽  
Richard H. Simon

In vitro studies have demonstrated that the binding of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) to its cell surface receptor (uPAR) greatly accelerates plasminogen activation. However, the role of uPAR in clearing abnormal fibrin deposits from the lung is uncertain. Knowing that uPA binding to uPAR is species specific, we used adenoviral vectors to transfer human or murine uPA genes into human or mouse epithelial cells in vitro and to mouse lungs in vivo. By measuring degradation of fluorescein-labeled fibrin, we found that uPA lysed fibrin matrices more efficiently when expressed in cells of the same species. A monoclonal antibody that blocks the binding of human uPA to human uPAR suppressed fibrin degradation by human cells expressing human uPA but not murine uPA. Importantly, 3 days after intratracheal delivery of the vectors, mice receiving murine uPA transgenes degraded fibrin matrices formed within their air spaces more efficiently than animals transduced with human uPA genes. These results show that uPA bound to uPAR increases the efficiency of fibrinolysis on epithelial cell surfaces in a biologically relevant fashion.


2018 ◽  
Vol 94 (1115) ◽  
pp. 517-524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lamiaa Hamie ◽  
Georges Daoud ◽  
Georges Nemer ◽  
Tarek Nammour ◽  
Alissar El Chediak ◽  
...  

Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is a circulating form of a physiological and pathophysiological important cell surface receptor, implicated in inflammation. Recent studies showed that suPAR is a promising biomarker, useful for diagnosis, assessment and prognosis of several diseases. This review summarises the majority of preliminary studies and analyses the significance and the clinical application of suPAR in various clinical conditions. SuPAR seems to have a significant value in the diagnosis as well as prognosis of many diseases; nonetheless, it merits large-scale studies to set cut-off values that help physicians in following up their patients and accordingly tailor their treatment plans.


2004 ◽  
Vol 384 (3) ◽  
pp. 495-505 ◽  
Author(s):  
Youli HU ◽  
David GONZÁLEZ-MARTÍNEZ ◽  
Soo-Hyun KIM ◽  
Pierre Marc Gilles BOULOUX

Defective function of anosmin-1, the protein encoded by KAL-1, underlies X-linked Kallmann's syndrome (X-KS), a human hereditary developmental disorder. Anosmin-1 appears to play a role in neurite outgrowth and axon branching, although molecular mechanisms of its action are still unknown. Anosmin-1 contains a WAP (whey acidic protein-like) domain and four contiguous FnIII (fibronectin-like type III) repeats; its WAP domain shows similarity to known serine protease inhibitors, whereas the FnIII domains contain HS (heparan sulphate)-binding sequences. To investigate the functional role of these domains, we have generated both wild-type and mutant recombinant anosmin-1 proteins using a Drosophila S2 cell expression system. Here we present the first biochemical evidence demonstrating the high-binding affinity between HS and anosmin-1, as measured by SPR (surface plasmon resonance) (Kd=2 nM). The FnIII domains, particularly the first, are essential for dose-dependent HS binding and HS-mediated cell surface association. Furthermore, we have identified uPA (urokinase-type plasminogen activator) as an anosmin-1 interactant. Anosmin-1 significantly enhances the amidolytic activity of uPA in vitro; and anosmin-1–HS–uPA co-operation induces cell proliferation in the PC-3 prostate carcinoma cell line. Both the HS interaction and an intact WAP domain are required for the mitogenic activity of anosmin-1. These effects appear to be mediated by a direct protein interaction between anosmin-1 and uPA, since anosmin-1–uPA could be co-immunoprecipitated from PC-3 cell lysates, and their direct binding with high affinity (Kd=6.91 nM) was demonstrated by SPR. We thus propose that anosmin-1 may modulate the catalytic activity of uPA and its signalling pathway, whereas HS determines cell surface localization of the anosmin-1–uPA complex.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document