916: Phase I Trial of Intra Vesical Docetaxel in the Treatment of Superficial Bladder Cancer Resistant to Standard Intra Vesical Therapy

2005 ◽  
Vol 173 (4S) ◽  
pp. 247-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
James M. McKiernan ◽  
Alana M. Murphy ◽  
Manlio Goetzl ◽  
Puneet Masson ◽  
Manisha Desai ◽  
...  
2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (19) ◽  
pp. 3075-3080 ◽  
Author(s):  
James M. McKiernan ◽  
Puneet Masson ◽  
Alana M. Murphy ◽  
Manlio Goetzl ◽  
Carl A. Olsson ◽  
...  

Purpose Up to 50% of patients treated with intravesical agents for superficial bladder cancer will experience recurrence. Response rates to second-line intravesical therapies range from 20% to 40%. For these high-risk patients, novel agents are necessary to prevent recurrence. Docetaxel is a microtubule depolymerization inhibitor with unique physiochemical properties, making it an excellent candidate for investigation as an intravesical agent. Patients and Methods This phase I trial included patients with recurrent Ta, T1, and Tis transitional cell carcinoma who experienced treatment failure with at least one prior intravesical treatment. Docetaxel was administered as six weekly instillations at a starting dose of 5 mg, with a dose-escalation model used until a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was achieved. Primary end points were dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and MTD. Efficacy was evaluated by cystoscopy with biopsy, cytology, and computed tomography imaging. Results Eighteen patients (100%) completed the trial, and the distribution of stages included six patients with Tis, seven with Ta, and five with T1 disease. No grade 3 or 4 DLTs occurred in 108 infusions, and no patient had systemic absorption of docetaxel. Eight (44%) of 18 patients experienced grade 1 or 2 toxicities, with dysuria being the most common. Ten (56%) of 18 patients had no evidence of disease at their post-treatment cystoscopy and biopsy. None of the patients who experienced relapse had disease progression. Conclusion Intravesical docetaxel exhibited minimal toxicity and no systemic absorption in the first human intravesical clinical trial. This suggests that docetaxel is a safe agent for further evaluation of efficacy in a phase II trial.


2008 ◽  
Vol 179 (4S) ◽  
pp. 121-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa A Laudano ◽  
Alana M Murphy ◽  
Daniel P Petrylak ◽  
Manisha Desai ◽  
Mitchell C Benson ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 186 (2) ◽  
pp. 448-451 ◽  
Author(s):  
James M. McKiernan ◽  
LaMont J. Barlow ◽  
Melissa A. Laudano ◽  
Mark J. Mann ◽  
Daniel P. Petrylak ◽  
...  

1991 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Sharifi ◽  
M Lee ◽  
M Clayton ◽  
D Lamb ◽  
P Siami ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16047-e16047
Author(s):  
L. Barlow ◽  
M. Laudano ◽  
M. Mann ◽  
M. Desai ◽  
D. Petrylak ◽  
...  

e16047 Background: Up to 50% of patients treated with intravesical agents for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer will recur. Response rates to current second line intravesical therapies average less than 20%. For these high risk patients, novel agents are necessary. Our previously completed phase I trial showed docetaxel to be a safe and efficacious agent for intravesical therapy. Nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab-) paclitaxel has been shown to have increased solubility and lower toxicity compared to docetaxel in systemic therapy and is therefore an appropriate candidate for further investigation as an intravesical agent. Methods: The ongoing phase I component of this combined phase I/II trial began enrollment on 1/1/08 and has reached 72% accrual as of 1/1/09. Inclusion criteria include recurrent high grade (HG) Ta, T1 and Tis transitional cell carcinoma failing at least one prior regimen with any intravesical agent. In phase I, 6 weekly instillations of nab-paclitaxel were administered beginning at a dose of 150 mg with a dose escalation model used until a maximal tolerated dose (MTD) was achieved. The primary endpoints were dose- limiting toxicity (DLT) and MTD; the secondary endpoint was response rate. Efficacy was evaluated by cystoscopy with biopsy, cytology, and CT imaging. Results: 13/18 patients have enrolled in this phase I trial to date, and the distribution of stages included 5 patients with Tis, 4 patients with HGTa, and 4 patients with HGT1. No patient has had any systemic absorption of nab-paclitaxel as measured by HPLC assays, and no grade 3 or 4 DLT has been encountered. Fifty-four percent (7/13) patients were noted to experience grade 1 toxicities, with dysuria being the most common. Forty-two percent (5/12) of completed patients had no evidence of disease at their post-treatment cystoscopy. None of the patients who developed recurrent disease have had disease progression. Conclusions: Intravesical nab-paclitaxel has exhibited minimal toxicity and no systemic absorption in the first ever human intravesical dose escalation trial. Upon completion of this ongoing phase I trial, we plan to evaluate this agent in a larger phase II efficacy study. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS509-TPS509
Author(s):  
Manuel R. De Jesus Escano ◽  
Daniel D. Sjoberg ◽  
Melissa McCarter ◽  
Marlena McGill ◽  
Alvin Goh ◽  
...  

TPS509 Background: Intravesical BCG is the most effective treatment for high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), yet recurrences are common. Patients with BCG-relapsing NMIBC are often re-treated with BCG or BCG with interferon (IFN) with an expected response rate of only 40–60%. Several studies show that a major mechanism of resistance to BCG is high levels of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and regulatory T cells (Tregs) in the pretreatment tumor microenvironment. Gemcitabine is a commonly used intravesical treatment for NMIBC that, in addition to direct anti-tumor cytotoxic effects, may also reduce MDSCs and Tregs. Prior trials combining BCG with intravesical mitomycin C have shown improved efficacy over BCG alone but with higher toxicity. While gemcitabine has been shown to be better tolerated than mitomycin as an intravesical treatment, no study has looked at combined BCG and intravesical gemcitabine. We hypothesize that combining BCG and intravesical gemcitabine will be well tolerated and result in higher response rates by reducing levels of MDSCs and Tregs. A novel aspect of our trial design is the use of a modified continual reassessment method to more accurately identify the maximum tolerated dose instead of the traditional 3 + 3 design used in most NMIBC phase I trials. Methods: This is an investigator-initiated phase I trial (NCT04179162) that will study the safety of alternating intravesical gemcitabine and BCG. Inclusion and exclusion criteria are designed so most patients who would ordinarily be re-treated with BCG or BCG/IFN would be eligible. Patients must have recurrent high-grade NMIBC within 24 months of their last BCG treatment without meeting the criteria for BCG-unresponsive NMIBC. Intravesical gemcitabine is given twice a week on weeks 1, 4, 7, and 10, for a total of 8 doses. BCG (50 mg) is given once a week on weeks 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, and 9, for a total of 6 doses. The trial is monitored using a modified continual reassessment method with increasing dose levels of gemcitabine (500 mg, 1,000 mg, 1,500 mg, and 2,000 mg) being evaluated. Adverse events are assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. The primary objective is to determine the maximum tolerated dose of this combination to inform our planned phase II trial. Correlative studies will look at the immunomodulating effects of gemcitabine by evaluating changes in immune cell populations in serial blood and urine specimens. Tissue and urine will also be evaluated for molecular determinants of response and resistance to the combination. The trial is open to enrollment with 10 of 25 planned patients accrued to date. Clinical trial information: NCT04179162.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document