scholarly journals Equilibrium in competitive insurance markets with ex ante adverse selection and ex post moral hazard

2002 ◽  
Vol 84 (2) ◽  
pp. 251-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Jack
2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 174-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gharad Bryan ◽  
Dean Karlan ◽  
Jonathan Zinman

Empirical evidence on peer intermediation lags behind both theory and practice in which lenders use peers to mitigate adverse selection and moral hazard. Using a referral incentive under individual liability, we develop a two-stage field experiment that permits separate identification of peer screening and enforcement. Our key contribution is to allow for borrower heterogeneity in both ex ante repayment type and ex post susceptibility to social pressure. Our method allows identification of selection on repayment likelihood, selection on susceptibility to social pressure, and loan enforcement. Implementing our method in South Africa we find no evidence of screening but large enforcement effects. (JEL D14, D82, G21, O12, O16)


2009 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 193-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georges Dionne

ABSTRACT In this paper, we present a survey of the two main problems of information in insurance markets: moral hazard and adverse selection. Both arise because the insurers are less informed than the insureds. Moral hazard is explained by the fact that the insurer cannot observe, ex ante, the activities of the insured who may have the incentive to change the state of the world in response to insurance coverage. Adverse selection arises since the insurer cannot determine without costs, the risks inherent in the individuals. After defining formally these two problems, we shall present different insurance strategies (private and public) with a view to correct them. In conclusion we shall propose some avenues of research.


2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 55-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillaume Roger

I study a model of moral hazard with soft information: the agent alone observes the stochastic outcome of her action; hence the principal faces a problem of ex post adverse selection. With limited instruments the principal cannot solve these two problems independently; the ex post incentive for misreporting interacts with the ex ante incentives for effort. This affects the shape and properties of the optimal contract, which fails to elicit truthful revelation in all states. In this setup audit and transfer become strategic complements; this is rooted in the nonseparability of the problem. (JEL D82, D86)


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 100031
Author(s):  
Seyed Alireza Otobideh ◽  
Hasan Yusefzadeh ◽  
Siamak Aghlmand ◽  
Cyrus Alinia

Author(s):  
Indranil Chakraborty ◽  
Fahad Khalil ◽  
Jacques Lawarree

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document