Word Problems - Decision Problems and the Burnside Problem in Group Theory

1974 ◽  
Vol 28 (127) ◽  
pp. 866
Author(s):  
Wilhelm Magnus ◽  
W. W. Boone ◽  
F. B. Cannonito ◽  
C. R. Lyndon

Author(s):  
Karem A. Sakallah

Symmetry is at once a familiar concept (we recognize it when we see it!) and a profoundly deep mathematical subject. At its most basic, a symmetry is some transformation of an object that leaves the object (or some aspect of the object) unchanged. For example, a square can be transformed in eight different ways that leave it looking exactly the same: the identity “do-nothing” transformation, 3 rotations, and 4 mirror images (or reflections). In the context of decision problems, the presence of symmetries in a problem’s search space can frustrate the hunt for a solution by forcing a search algorithm to fruitlessly explore symmetric subspaces that do not contain solutions. Recognizing that such symmetries exist, we can direct a search algorithm to look for solutions only in non-symmetric parts of the search space. In many cases, this can lead to significant pruning of the search space and yield solutions to problems which are otherwise intractable. This chapter explores the symmetries of Boolean functions, particularly the symmetries of their conjunctive normal form (CNF) representations. Specifically, it examines what those symmetries are, how to model them using the mathematical language of group theory, how to derive them from a CNF formula, and how to utilize them to speed up CNF SAT solvers.


1965 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. H. Bruck

In the course of preparing a book on group theory [1] with special reference to the Restricted Burnside Problem and allied problems I stumbled upon the concept of a dimension-linking operator. Later, when I lectured to the Third Summer Institute of the Australian Mathematical Society [2], G. E. Wall raised the question whether the dimension-linking operators could be made into a ring by introduction of a suitable definition of multiplication. The answer was easily found to be affirmative; the result wasthat the theory of dimen sion-linking operators became exceedingly simple.


1982 ◽  
Vol s3-44 (2) ◽  
pp. 312-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. A. Kalorkoti

2005 ◽  
Vol 190 (2) ◽  
pp. 343-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilya Kapovich ◽  
Alexei Myasnikov ◽  
Paul Schupp ◽  
Vladimir Shpilrain

2003 ◽  
Vol 264 (2) ◽  
pp. 665-694 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilya Kapovich ◽  
Alexei Myasnikov ◽  
Paul Schupp ◽  
Vladimir Shpilrain

1993 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 275-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Cowan ◽  
Norman R. Reilly

AbstractThe importance of the fundamental group of a graph in group theory has been well known for many years. The recent work of Meakin, Margolis and Stephen has shown how effective graph theoretic techniques can be in the study of word problems in inverse semigroups. Our goal here is to characterize those deterministic inverse word graphs that are Schutzenberger graphs and consider how deterministic inverse word graphs and Schutzenberger graphs can be constructed from subgroups of free groups.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document