Enrollment strategies in early home visitation to prevent physical child abuse and neglect and the “universal versus targeted” debate: a meta-analysis of population-based and screening-based programs

1999 ◽  
Vol 23 (9) ◽  
pp. 863-890 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil B Guterman
PEDIATRICS ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
David L. Olds ◽  
Charles R. Henderson ◽  
Robert Chamberlin ◽  
Robert Tatelbaum

A program of prenatal and infancy home visitation by nurses was tested as a method of preventing a wide range of health and developmental problems in children born to primiparas who were either teenagers, unmarried, or of low socioeconomic status. Among the women at highest risk for care-giving dysfunction, those who were visited by a nurse had fewer instances of verified child abuse and neglect during the first 2 years of their children's lives (P = .07); they were observed in their homes to restrict and punish their children less frequently, and they provided more appropriate play materials; their babies were seen in the emergency room less frequently during the first year of life. During the second year of life, the babies of all nurse-visited women, regardless of the families' risk status, were seen in the emergency room fewer times, and they were seen by physicians less frequently for accidents and poisonings than comparison group babies (P ≤ .05 for all findings, except where indicated.) Treatment differences for child abuse and neglect and emergency room visits were more significant among women who had a lower sense of control over their lives.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 93 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
David L. Olds ◽  
Charles R. Henderson ◽  
Harriet Kitzman

Objective. To examine, during the 3rd and 4th years of life, the health, development, rates of child maltreatment, and living conditions of children who had been enrolled in a randomized trial of nurse home visitation during pregnancy and first 2 years of their lives. Design. Prospective follow-up of families who had been randomly assigned to nurse-visited and comparison conditions. Setting. Study conducted in semirural community in upstate New York. Families dispersed among 14 other states during 2-year period after children's second birthdays. Participants. Four hundred women were recruited through a health department antepartum clinic and offices of private obstetricians and were registered before 30th week of pregnancy. All women had no previous live births and 85% were either teenaged (< 18 years at registration), unmarried, or from Hollingshead social classes IV or V. Analysis focused on whites, who comprised 89% of sample. Intervention. Nurse home visitation from pregnancy through second year of the child's life. Main Results. There were no treatment differences in the rates of child abuse and neglect or children's intellectual functioning from 25 to 48 months of age. Nurse-visited children, nevertheless, lived in homes with fewer hazards for children; they had 40% fewer injuries and ingestions and 45% fewer behavioral and parental coping problems noted in the physician record; and they made 35% fewer visits to the emergency department than did children in the comparison group. Nurse-visited mothers were observed to be more involved with and to punish their children to a greater extent than were mothers in the comparison group. The functional meaning of punishment differed between the nurse-visited and comparison families. Conclusions. The program does have enduring effects on certain aspects of parental caregiving, safety of the home, and children's use of the health care system, but it may be necessary to extend the length of the program for families at highest risk to produce lasting reductions in child abuse and neglect.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroki Tamon ◽  
Maiko Suto ◽  
Kunio Ogawa ◽  
Kenji Takehara ◽  
Yoshiyuki Tachibana

Abstract Background: The prevention of child abuse and neglect is an urgent matter, as abuse and neglect are associated with serious effects even into adulthood, and as there is an increased risk of the offspring of abused children being abused themselves. Intervening as early as possible may prevent abuse that can begin in infancy. Although several systematic reviews and meta-analyses have investigated the effects of interventions on populations at risk for child abuse and neglect, few studies have focused on at-risk women or interventions that start during perinatal periods. This study aims to describe a systematic review to examine the effects of interventions to prevent child abuse and neglect that begin during pregnancy and just after childbirth (less than one year). The study will involve performing a systematic review and meta-analysis based on the latest research articles up to and including November 2020 and a broader literature search.Methods: The protocol was prepared using the 2015 statement of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols. The review will follow Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines/statements. The literature search will be performed using the MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases from inception onward. Randomized controlled trials of interventions that begin during pregnancy or the first year postpartum and are designed to prevent child abuse and neglect in at-risk families will be included. Data collection, quality assessment, and statistical syntheses will be conducted by following methods in the protocol that are defined in advance.Discussion: The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis will be important in clinical and political settings for the prevention of child abuse and neglect. The results of this study will provide a basis for the development of evidence-based intervention programs for expectant and new parents and child abuse prevention policies. Additionally, this study will encourage future studies to conduct more evidence-based intervention programs and illuminate the direction of research on the prevention of child abuse and neglect.Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42021266462


JAMA ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 284 (11) ◽  
pp. 1385 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Eckenrode ◽  
Barbara Ganzel ◽  
Charles R. Henderson, Jr ◽  
Elliott Smith ◽  
David L. Olds ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document