Somatotopical organization of Fos-like immunoreactivity in rat cervical spinal cord following noxious stimulation of the forelimb

Neuroscience ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 101 (1) ◽  
pp. 179-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
V.M King ◽  
R Apps
2005 ◽  
Vol 102 (3) ◽  
pp. 624-632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven L. Jinks ◽  
Carmen L. Dominguez ◽  
Joseph F. Antognini

Background Individuals with spinal cord injury may undergo multiple surgical procedures; however, it is not clear how spinal cord injury affects anesthetic requirements and movement force under anesthesia during both acute and chronic stages of the injury. Methods The authors determined the isoflurane minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) necessary to block movement in response to supramaximal noxious stimulation, as well as tail-flick and hind paw withdrawal latencies, before and up to 28 days after thoracic spinal transection. Tail-flick and hind paw withdrawal latencies were measured in the awake state to test for the presence of spinal shock or hyperreflexia. The authors measured limb forces elicited by noxious mechanical stimulation of a paw or the tail at 28 days after transection. Limb force experiments were also conducted in other animals that received a reversible spinal conduction block by cooling the spinal cord at the level of the eighth thoracic vertebra. Results A large decrease in MAC (to </= 40% of pretransection values) occurred after spinal transection, with partial recovery (to approximately 60% of control) at 14-28 days after transection. Awake tail-flick and hind paw withdrawal latencies were facilitated or unchanged, whereas reflex latencies under isoflurane were depressed or absent. However, at 80-90% of MAC, noxious stimulation of the hind paw elicited ipsilateral limb withdrawals in all animals. Hind limb forces were reduced (by >/= 90%) in both chronic and acute cold-block spinal animals. Conclusions The immobilizing potency of isoflurane increases substantially after spinal transection, despite the absence of a baseline motor depression, or "spinal shock." Therefore, isoflurane MAC is determined by a spinal depressant action, possibly counteracted by a supraspinal facilitatory action. The partial recovery in MAC at later time points suggests that neuronal plasticity after spinal cord injury influences anesthetic requirements.


2000 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 386-392 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masazumi Inoue ◽  
Hiroyuki Nakase ◽  
Hidehiro Hirabayashi ◽  
Toru Hoshida ◽  
Hoshida Toru ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
pp. 2274-2279 ◽  
Author(s):  
CARL J. CHANG ◽  
SHIH-TSUNG HUANG ◽  
KENNETH HSU ◽  
AUSTIN LIN ◽  
MARSHALL L. STOLLER ◽  
...  

1981 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
pp. 245-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. M. Frier ◽  
R. J. M. Corrall ◽  
J. L. Pritchard ◽  
P. S. Sever

1. The changes in blood glucose, plasma noradrenaline and plasma renin activity were measured in 11 normal subjects and in six tetraplegic subjects with a transection of the cervical spinal cord (preganglionic sympathectomy), in response to acute insulin-induced hypoglycaemia (0.15 unit/kg). 2. After hypoglycaemia, a pronounced rise in plasma noradrenaline was observed in the normal subjects but was absent in the tetraplegic group; plasma renin activity increased markedly in both groups. 3. It is concluded that the stimulation of renin release in response to hypoglycaemia can occur independently of any activation of the sympatho-adrenal system.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Capogrosso ◽  
Beatrice Barra ◽  
Sara Conti ◽  
Matthew Perich ◽  
Katie Zhuang ◽  
...  

Abstract Regaining arm motor control is critical for people with paralysis. Despite promising results on grasping, no technology could restore effective arm control. Here, we show that electrical stimulation of the cervical spinal cord enabled three monkeys with cervical spinal injury to execute functional arm movements. We designed an epidural interface that engaged surviving spinal circuits via the recruitment of large sensory afferents to produce movement. Simple stimulation bursts produced sustained joint movements which, triggered by movement-related intracortical signals, enabled monkeys with arm paralysis to perform an unconstrained, three-dimensional reach and grasp task. This restoration of voluntary motor control was enabled by the synergistic integration of spared descending commands and electrical stimulation within the spinal cord. The simplicity of this technology promises realistic clinical translation.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Barra ◽  
S. Conti ◽  
M.G. Perich ◽  
K. Zhuang ◽  
G. Schiavone ◽  
...  

SUMMARYRegaining arm motor control is a high priority for people with cervical spinal cord injury1. Unfortunately, no therapy can reverse upper limb paralysis. Promising neurotechnologies stimulating muscles to bypass the injury enabled grasping in humans with SCI2,3 but failed to sustain whole arm functional movements that are necessary for daily living activities. Here, we show that electrical stimulation of the cervical spinal cord enabled three monkeys with cervical SCI to execute functional, three-dimensional, arm movements. We designed a lateralized epidural interface that targeted motoneurons through the recruitment of sensory afferents within the dorsal roots and was adapted to the specific anatomy of each monkey. Simple stimulation bursts engaging single roots produced selective joint movements. We then triggered these bursts using movement-related intracortical signals, which enabled monkeys with arm motor deficits to perform an unconstrained, three-dimensional reach and grasp task. Our technology increased muscle activity, forces, task performance and quality of arm movements. Finally, analysis of intra-cortical neural data showed that a synergistic interaction between spared descending pathways and electrical stimulation enabled this restoration of voluntary motor control. Spinal cord stimulation is a mature clinical technology4–7, which suggests a realistic path for our approach to clinical applications.


2000 ◽  
Vol 84 (4) ◽  
pp. 2078-2112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy Malick ◽  
Rew M. Strassman ◽  
Rami Burstein

Sensory information that arises in orofacial organs facilitates exploratory, ingestive, and defensive behaviors that are essential to overall fitness and survival. Because the hypothalamus plays an important role in the execution of these behaviors, sensory signals conveyed by the trigeminal nerve must be available to this brain structure. Recent anatomical studies have shown that a large number of neurons in the upper cervical spinal cord and caudal medulla project directly to the hypothalamus. The goal of the present study was to identify the types of information that these neurons carry to the hypothalamus and to map the route of their ascending axonal projections. Single-unit recording and antidromic microstimulation techniques were used to identify 81 hypothalamic-projecting neurons in the caudal medulla and upper cervical (C1) spinal cord that exhibited trigeminal receptive fields. Of the 72 neurons whose locations were identified, 54 were in laminae I–V of the dorsal horn at the level of C1 ( n = 22) or nucleus caudalis (Vc, n = 32) and were considered trigeminohypothalamic tract (THT) neurons because these regions are within the main projection territory of trigeminal primary afferent fibers. The remaining 18 neurons were in the adjacent lateral reticular formation (LRF) and were considered reticulohypothalamic tract (RHT) neurons. The receptive fields of THT neurons were restricted to the innervation territory of the trigeminal nerve and included the tongue and lips, cornea, intracranial dura, and vibrissae. Based on their responses to mechanical stimulation of cutaneous or intraoral receptive fields, the majority of THT neurons were classified as nociceptive (38% high-threshold, HT, 42% wide-dynamic-range, WDR), but in comparison to the spinohypothalamic tract (SHT), a relatively high percentage of low-threshold (LT) neurons were also found (20%). Responses to thermal stimuli were found more commonly in WDR than in HT neurons: 75% of HT and 93% of WDR neurons responded to heat, while 16% of HT and 54% of WDR neurons responded to cold. These neurons responded primarily to noxious intensities of thermal stimulation. In contrast, all LT neurons responded to innocuous and noxious intensities of both heat and cold stimuli, a phenomenon that has not been described for other populations of mechanoreceptive LT neurons at spinal or trigeminal levels. In contrast to THT neurons, RHT neurons exhibited large and complex receptive fields, which extended over both orofacial (“trigeminal”) and extracephalic (“non-trigeminal”) skin areas. Their responses to stimulation of trigeminal receptive fields were greater than their responses to stimulation of non-trigeminal receptive fields, and their responses to innocuous stimuli were induced only when applied to trigeminal receptive fields. As described for SHT axons, the axons of THT and RHT neurons ascended through the contralateral brain stem to the supraoptic decussation (SOD) in the lateral hypothalamus; 57% of them then crossed the midline to reach the ipsilateral hypothalamus. Collateral projections were found in the superior colliculus, substantia nigra, red nucleus, anterior pretectal nucleus, and in the lateral, perifornical, dorsomedial, suprachiasmatic, and supraoptic hypothalamic nuclei. Additional projections (which have not been described previously for SHT neurons) were found rostral to the hypothalamus in the caudate-putamen, globus pallidus, and substantia innominata. The findings that nonnociceptive signals reach the hypothalamus primarily through the direct THT route, whereas nociceptive signals reach the hypothalamus through both the direct THT and the indirect RHT routes suggest that highly prioritized painful signals are transferred in parallel channels to ensure that this critical information reaches the hypothalamus, a brain area that regulates homeostasis and other humoral responses required for the survival of the organism.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document