Linking a web based electronic patient record with a DICOM PACS

2001 ◽  
Vol 1230 ◽  
pp. 801-804
Author(s):  
J. Reponen ◽  
J. Niinimäki ◽  
T. Leinonen ◽  
J. Korpelainen ◽  
J. Oikarinen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Patient Record ◽  
Patient Record ◽  
Web Based

A secure and expandable electronic patient record system using web-based technology

2009 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 73
Author(s):  
Roger Dzwonczyk ◽  
Michael Howie ◽  
Carlos del Río ◽  
Furrukh Khan ◽  
Luis Lopez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Patient Record ◽  
Patient Record ◽  
Electronic Patient Record System ◽  
Record System ◽  
Web Based

A Web-Based Electronic Patient Record System as a Means for Collection of Clinical Data

2001 ◽  
pp. 198-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lutz Fritsche ◽  
Kay Schröter ◽  
Gabriela Lindemann ◽  
Regina Kunz ◽  
Klemens Budde ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Data ◽  
Electronic Patient Record ◽  
Patient Record ◽  
Electronic Patient Record System ◽  
Record System ◽  
Web Based

The integration of medical images with the electronic patient record and their web-based distribution1

2004 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 661-668 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Münch ◽  
U. Engelmann ◽  
A. Schröter ◽  
H.P. Meinzer
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Patient Record ◽  
Medical Images ◽  
Patient Record ◽  
Web Based

scholarly journals CIS3/398: Implementation of a Web-Based Electronic Patient Record for Transplant Recipients

1999 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. e8
Author(s):  
L Fritsche ◽  
G Lindemann ◽  
K Schroeter ◽  
A Schlaefer ◽  
H-H Neumayer
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Patient Record ◽  
Patient Record ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Web Based

TBase2 — a Web–Based Electronic Patient Record

2000 ◽  
Vol 43 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 343-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kay Schröter ◽  
Gabriela Lindemann - v.Trzebiatowski ◽  
Lutz Fritsche
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Patient Record ◽  
Patient Record ◽  
Web Based

Improving Coded Data Entry by an Electronic Patient Record System

1996 ◽  
Vol 35 (02) ◽  
pp. 108-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Puerner ◽  
H. Soltanian ◽  
J. H. Hohnloser
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Electronic Patient Record ◽  
Data Entry ◽  
Discharge Summary ◽  
Patient Record ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Electronic Patient Record System ◽  
Record System ◽  
Data Encoding ◽  
Discharge Summaries

AbstractData are presented on the use of a browsing and encoding utility to improve coded data entry for an electronic patient record system. Traditional and computerized discharge summaries were compared: during three phases of coding ICD-9 diagnoses phase I, no coding; phase II, manual coding, and phase III, computerized semiautomatic coding. Our data indicate that (1) only 50% of all diagnoses in a discharge summary are encoded manually; (2) using a computerized browsing and encoding utility this percentage may increase by 64%; (3) when forced to encode manually, users may “shift” as much as 84% of relevant diagnoses from the appropriate coding section to other sections thereby “bypassing” the need to encode, this was reduced by up to 41 % with the computerized approach, and (4) computerized encoding can improve completeness of data encoding, from 46 to 100%. We conclude that the use of a computerized browsing and encoding tool can increase data quality and the percentage of documented data. Mechanisms bypassing the need to code can be avoided.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document