Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Campylobacter jejuni: a comparison between Etest and agar dilution method

2003 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ozge Oncul ◽  
Pinar Zarakolu ◽  
Ozgur Oncul ◽  
Deniz Gur
Keyword(s):  
Campylobacter Jejuni ◽  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Dilution Method ◽  
Agar Dilution Method ◽  
Agar Dilution

scholarly journals Broth Microdilution and Gradient Diffusion Strips vs. Reference Agar Dilution Method: First Evaluation for Clostridiales Species Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

Antibiotics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 975
Author(s):  
Florian Baquer ◽  
Asma Ali Sawan ◽  
Michel Auzou ◽  
Antoine Grillon ◽  
Benoît Jaulhac ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Reference Method ◽  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Dilution Method ◽  
Agar Dilution Method ◽  
Broth Microdilution ◽  
Multicenter Studies ◽  
Gradient Diffusion ◽  
Agar Dilution

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of anaerobes is challenging. Because MIC determination is recommended by both CLSI and EUCAST, commercial broth microdilution and diffusion strip tests have been developed. The reliability of broth microdilution methods has not been assessed yet using the agar dilution reference method. In this work, we evaluated two broth microdilution kits (MICRONAUT-S Anaerobes® MIC and Sensititre Anaerobe MIC®) and one gradient diffusion strip method (Liofilchem®) for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of 47 Clostridiales isolates (Clostridium, Clostridioides and Hungatella species) using the agar dilution method as a reference. The evaluation focused on comparing six antimicrobial molecules available in both microdilution kits. Analytical performances were evaluated according to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommendations. Essential agreements (EA) and categorical agreements (CA) varied greatly according to the molecule and the evaluated method. Vancomycin had values of essential and categorical agreements above 90% for the three methods. The CA fulfilled the FDA criteria for three major molecules in the treatment of Gram-positive anaerobic infections (metronidazole, piperacillin/tazobactam and vancomycin). The highest rate of error was observed for clindamycin. Multicenter studies are needed to further validate these results.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus by the VITEK 2 system, and comparison with two NCCLS reference methods

2004 ◽  
Vol 53 (12) ◽  
pp. 1229-1232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Intetsu Kobayashi ◽  
Hiroe Muraoka ◽  
Takako Iyoda ◽  
Minoru Nishida ◽  
Miyuki Hasegawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Dilution Method ◽  
Agar Dilution Method ◽  
Major Error ◽  
Reference Methods ◽  
Agar Dilution ◽  
Vitek 2 ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant

We evaluated the automated VITEK 2 system (bioMérieux) for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE). The results obtained with the VITEK 2 system were compared to those obtained using two NCCLS reference methods. The VITEK 2 system produced MICs for penicillin G, erythromycin and vancomycin that were very similar to those of the reference agar-dilution test with all results being within a twofold dilution. When MICs of teicoplanin for these isolates were measured by the agar-dilution method and VITEK 2 system, there was one ‘very major’ error and seven ‘minor’ errors. There were no ‘major’ errors for any of the antibiotics tested. When the results obtained by the micro broth-dilution method were compared with those obtained by the VITEK 2 system, there was one ‘very major’ error for teicoplanin by the VITEK 2 system, as was the case with the agar-dilution method. There were two ‘minor’ errors for erythromycin and seven ‘minor’ errors for teicoplanin. There were no ‘major’ errors for any of the antibiotics tested. The 35 VRE strains identified phenotypically by the VITEK 2 Advanced Expert System included nine of Enterococcus faecalis and 23 of Enterococcus faecium. Neither Enterococcus avium nor Enterococcus hirae were identified. A total of 32 phenotypes were classified into 22 VanA and 10 VanB strains. PCR genotyping demonstrated 23 vanA + and nine vanB + strains. There were differences between the VITEK 2 system results and those of PCR. Overall, 54.3 % of the test results were obtained within 7 h. All MIC values for the 35 VRE isolates were determined within 13 h of completing incubation. The VITEK 2 system is a simple method for accurately detecting vancomycin-resistant strains of Enterococcus and can be used to rapidly determine MICs.

scholarly journals Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of thermophilic campylobacters isolated from patients in the town of Nis

2009 ◽  
Vol 66 (7) ◽  
pp. 522-526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Biljana Miljkovic-Selimovic ◽  
Tatjana Babic ◽  
Branislava Kocic ◽  
Ljiljana Ristic
Keyword(s):  
Nalidixic Acid ◽  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Dilution Method ◽  
Agar Dilution Method ◽  
Thermophilic Campylobacter ◽  
Agar Dilution ◽  
High Level ◽  
Susceptibility Profiles ◽  
The Town

Background/Aim. In some clinical forms of human Campylobacter infections, such as prolonged diarrhea or associated with postinfections sequels, antibacterial treatment is necessary. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the antimicrobial susceptibility of thermophilic Campylobacter strains isolated from patients with diarrhea, as well as from patients with diarrhea followed by postinfections sequels, to drugs used in the therapy of enterocolitis, and to nalidixic acid used in laboratory identification and differentiation of thermophilic Campylobacter spp. Methods. We studied the antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of 131 Campylobacter strains isolated from patients with diarrhea (122 strains), diarrhea associated with rheumatic disorders (8 strains), and one strain isolated from a patient with Guillain-Barr? Syndrome following Campylobacter enterocolitis. Susceptibility testing to erythromycin, gentamicin, tetracycline, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin and nalidixic acid was performed by the agar dilution method. Results. In the strains we investigated, resistance to gentamicin and chloramphenicol was not recorded, whereas a low rate of strains resistant to erythromycin (2.4%), a higher prevalence of strains resistant to tetracycline (9.9%), and a high level of resistance to ciprofloxacin (29.8%) and nalidixic acid (33.3%) were registered. All strains resistant to nalidixic acid were also resistant to ciprofloxacin. In addition, there was no difference in the occurrence of resistance between strains isolated from patients with diarrhea as compared to those isolated from patients with diarrhea followed by postinfection disorders. Conclusion. The fact that the most of Campylobacter strains were sensitive to erythromycin and all to gentamicin, makes erythromycin an antibiotic of choice in the treatment of Campylobacter diarrhea and gentamicin when parenteral therapy should be administered. Resistance to tetracycline and, especially, ciprofloxacin, necessitates antibiotic susceptibility testing.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document