scholarly journals Predictive Markers for Overall and Progression-Free Survival with Capox in Second-Line Chemotherapy of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. ix218
Author(s):  
M.D.P. Solís Hernández ◽  
P. Jimenez Fonseca ◽  
Q. Perez ◽  
C. Alvarez Fernandez ◽  
L. Ruiz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Predictive Markers ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Second Line Chemotherapy ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

A phase II trial of panitumumab with irinotecan and S-1 (IRIS) as second-line treatment in patients with wild-type KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 732-732
Author(s):  
Rai Shimoyama ◽  
Tetsuo Kimura ◽  
Toshi Takaoka ◽  
Kazuki Sakamoto ◽  
Shunji Kawamoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Second Line Chemotherapy ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

732 Background: Panitumumab with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) in second-line chemotherapy increased objective response rate and prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) versus FOLFIRI alone in patients with wild-type (WT) KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) (Peeters et al, J Clin Oncol 2010). This trial (UMIN000004659) evaluated tolerability and efficacy of combination therapy with irinotecan and S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine (IRIS) plus panitumumab as second-line chemotherapy in patients with WT KRASmCRC. Methods: Main inclusion criteria were: patients with WT KRAS mCRC refractory to one prior chemotherapy regimen for mCRC, ECOG PS 0-2, and age ≥20 years. Patients received panitumumab (6 mg/m2) and irinotecan (100 mg/m2) on days 1 and 15 and S-1 (40-60 mg according to body surface area) twice daily for 2 weeks, repeated every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was completion rate of protocol therapy (CRT). The secondary endpoints were response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Thirty-seven patients were enrolled in 9 centers. The overall CRT was 62.2% (23/37). Most frequent grade 3/4 toxicities were: skin rash (24%), diarrhea (16%), and appetite loss (11%). The overall RR was 32.4% (12/37). Of these, four patients underwent conversion surgery. Median PFS and OS were 9.5 months (95% CI: 3.5-15.4 months) and 20.1 months (95% CI: 16.7-23.2 months), respectively. Conclusions: IRIS plus panitumumab has acceptable toxicity profile and promising efficacy in patients with previously treated WT KRAS mCRC. This regimen can be an additional treatment option for second-line chemotherapy in WT KRAS mCRC. Clinical trial information: UMIN000004659.

scholarly journals Second-line chemotherapy after early disease progression during first-line chemotherapy containing bevacizumab for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shun Yamamoto ◽  
Kengo Nagashima ◽  
Takeshi Kawakami ◽  
Seiichiro Mitani ◽  
Masato Komoda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Early Disease ◽  
Second Line Chemotherapy ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

Abstract Background The ML18174 study, which showed benefits of bevacizumab (BEV) continuation beyond progression (BBP) for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), excluded patients with first-line progression-free survival (PFS) shorter than 3 months. The present study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of second-line chemotherapy after early disease progression during first-line chemotherapy containing bevacizumab. Methods The subjects of this study were mCRC patients who experienced disease progression < 100 days from commencement of first-line chemotherapy containing BEV initiated between Apr 2007 and Dec 2016. Second-line chemotherapy regimens were classified into two groups with and without BEV/other anti-angiogenic agents (BBP and non-BBP) and efficacy and safety were compared using univariate and multivariate analysis. Results Sixty-one patients were identified as subjects of this study. Baseline characteristics were numerically different between BBP (n = 37) and non-BBP (n = 25) groups, such as performance status (0–1/> 2/unknown: 89/8/3 and 56/40/4%), RAS status (wild/mutant/unknown: 32/54/16 and 76/16/8%). Response rate was 8.6% in BBP group and 9.1% in non-BBP group (p = 1.00). Median PFS was 3.9 months in BBP group and 2.8 months in non-BBP group (HR [95%CI]: 0.79 [0.46–1.34], p = 0.373, adjusted HR: 0.87 [0.41–1.82], p = 0.707). Median overall survival was 8.5 months in BBP group and 5.4 months in non-BBP group (HR 0.66 [0.38–1.12], p = 0.125, adjusted HR 0.53 [0.27–1.07], p = 0.078). Conclusion In mCRC patients who experienced early progression in first-line chemotherapy, second-line chemotherapy showed poor clinical outcomes regardless use of anti-angiogenic agents.

scholarly journals Protocol of the EFFORT study: a prospective study of FOLFIRI plus aflibercept as second-line treatment after progression on FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab or during maintenance treatment in patients with unresectable/metastatic colorectal cancer

BMC Cancer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hironaga Satake ◽  
Koji Ando ◽  
Eiji Oki ◽  
Mototsugu Shimokawa ◽  
Akitaka Makiyama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

Abstract Background FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab is used as a first-line therapy for patients with unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer. However, there are no clear recommendations for second-line therapy after FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab combination. Here, we describe our planning for the EFFORT study to investigate whether FOLFIRI plus aflibercept has efficacy following FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab for mCRC. Methods EFFORT is an open-label, multicenter, single arm phase II study to evaluate whether a FOLFIRI plus aflibercept has efficacy following FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab for mCRC. Patients with unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer who received FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab as a first-line therapy will receive aflibercept and FOLFIRI (aflibercept 4 mg/kg, irinotecan 150 mg/m2 IV over 90 min, with levofolinate 200 mg/m2 IV over 2 h, followed by fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 bolus and fluorouracil 2400 mg/m2 continuous infusion over 46 h) every 2 weeks on day 1 of each cycle. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS). To achieve 80% power to show a significant response benefit with a one-sided alpha level of 0.10, assuming a threshold progression-free survival of 3 months and an expected value of at least 5.4 months, we estimated that 32 patients are necessary. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, overall response rate, safety, and exploratory biomarker analysis for differentiating anti-VEGF drug in 2nd-line chemotherapy for unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer. Discussion This is the first study to investigate whether FOLFIRI plus aflibercept has efficacy following FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab for unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer. Switching to a different type of anti-VEGF drug in second-line therapy after FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab appears to be an attractive treatment strategy when considering survival benefit. It is expected that this phase II study will prove the efficacy of this strategy and that a biomarker for drug selection will be discovered. Trial registration Japan Registry of Clinical Trials jRCTs071190003. Registered April 18, 2019.

A prospective study of carboplatin-etoposide in docetaxel-pretreated patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC): Clinical activity and correlation with neuroendocrine features

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5151-5151
Author(s):  
Y. Loriot ◽  
C. Massard ◽  
A. Plantade ◽  
B. Escudier ◽  
A. Chauchereau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Chromogranin A ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Baseline Serum ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Second Line Chemotherapy ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

5151 Background: There is currently no standard of care for patients (pts) with HRPC and disease progression after docetaxel-based chemotherapy. Platin compounds have demonstrated activity in this setting and in vitro evidence of synergy between carboplatin and etoposide has previously been reported. A significant proportion of advanced HRPC exhibit neuroendocrine features but there are limited data on whether these patients should be treated differently or not. Methods: Pts with HRPC who experienced failure after first-line docetaxel-based chemotherapy were prospectively treated with carboplatin (AUC 5 day 1) and etoposide (80 mg/m2 day 1 to 3), repeated every 3 weeks as second-line chemotherapy. The response rate (defined as a serum PSA decline of = 50%), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using consensus criteria (Bubley JCO 1999). Pain relief was evaluated using a visual analogic scale. Serum chromogranin A and neurone specific enolase (NSE) levels were measured at baseline. Toxicity was evaluated according to NCI criteria. Results: Forty-one HRPC pts, previously treated with docetaxel with (n=24) or without (n=17) estramustine, prospectively received carboplatin-etoposide as second-line chemotherapy. A PSA response was obtained in 9 pts (22%). Pain relief was achieved in 18 pts (45%). Median progression-free survival was 9 weeks and median overall survival was 19 months. Toxicity included grade 3–4 anemia in 25% and febrile neutropenia in 2%. Biological neuroendocrine features (e.g. elevated baseline serum chromogranin A and NSE) were not associated with response or PFS. The response rate was 18% and 31% in pts with normal and elevated baseline chromogranin A, respectively. Conclusions: The carboplatin-etoposide regimen is active and well-tolerated as second-line chemotherapy after docetaxel-based chemotherapy in HRPC patients. Activity was detected in both tumors with and without neuroendocrine features. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Second-line chemotherapy for gallbladder cancer.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 450-450
Author(s):  
Nicha Wongjarupong ◽  
Mohamed Abdelrahim Muddathir Hassan ◽  
Cristobal T. Sanhueza ◽  
Mindy L. Hartgers ◽  
Fatima Hassan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Gallbladder Cancer ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Second Line Chemotherapy ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

450 Background: The standard treatment for patients with gallbladder cancer is a combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin based on ABC-02 trial. However, there are no guidelines regarding treatment after first-line therapy. We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and overall survival of different second-line regimens. Methods: We identified 203 patients with advanced gallbladder cancer who received palliative treatment between January 2000 and December 2015 at Mayo Clinic, Rochester. RECIST criteria was used to assess response. Results: 68 patients received second-line chemotherapy. Median age was 63 years (range: 32-86) and majority were males (60.6%). The median time from the diagnosis to the start of the second line chemotherapy was 8 (1-120) months. The most common used second-line chemotherapy were FOLFOX (14), gemcitabine alone (10), single agent fluoropyrimidine (11), gemcitabine with capecitabine (5), and capecitabine with oxaliplatin (4). There were 30 patients that received 5-fluorouracil based regimens, 20 patients received gemcitabine-based regimen, 3 patients received taxane-based regimen, and 15 patients received other types of chemotherapy. Median progression free survival and overall survival was 2.1 (1.8-2.7) and 16.7 (13.2-21.3) months respectively. There were 10 (52%), 11 (37%), 2 (67%), 5 (33%) with partial response and stable disease in 5-fluorouracil-based, gemcitabine-based, taxane-based, and others, respectively. There were no difference in PFS, with median PFS of 2.5, 2.0, 2.8 and 2.3 months, respectively (p=0.43). The overall survival were 15.7 (8.9-40.2), 15.0 (10.7-21.3), 40.3 (22.0-47.0), and 20.4 (9.2-30.7) months, respectively (p=0.83). There were 27 patients that received single agent chemotherapy and 41 patients that received combined regimen. There were 17 (42%) patients and 13 (48%) patients with partial response or stable disease in single and combined regimen. There were no differences in progression free survival and overall survival between single and multi agent chemotherapy. Conclusions: In this largest single institution study, second-line chemotherapy regimens for gallbladder cancer provided benefit in select patients and there is an urgent need to develop more active therapeutic regimens.

Systemic immune-inflammation index to predict survival in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with second-line vinflunine.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17019-e17019
Author(s):  
Patrik Palacka ◽  
Jana Katolicka ◽  
Tana Albertova ◽  
Katarina Rejlekova ◽  
Jana Obertova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Second Line Chemotherapy ◽  
Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Immune Inflammation ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

e17019 Background: Based on our previous study, the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) is a prognostic factor in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (MUC) treated with platinum-based first-line chemotherapy. The objective of this retrospective analysis was to explore prognostic value of the SII at baseline of second-line chemotherapy with vinflunine in MUC population. Methods: We evaluated 70 consecutive MUC (53 bladder, 21 upper tract) patients (54 men) treated with second-line chemotherapy with vinflunine at four oncological departments since 2010. ECOG performance status (PS) ≤ 1 had 44 patients (pts.), haemoglobin < 10 g/dL was present in 25 pts. and liver involvement in 18 pts. SII was based on platelets (P), neutrophils (N) and lymphocytes (L) counts defined as PxN/L. This study population was dichotomized by median into low SII and high SII groups. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and their 95% CI were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and compared with logrank test. Results: At median follow-up of 9.0 months (1-29 months), 68 pts. experienced disease progression and 62 died. Pts. with low SII at baseline had significantly better PFS and OS opposite to those with high SII (HR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.37-1.00, p = 0.0318 for PFS, HR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.36-1.00, p = 0.0312 for OS, respectively). In addition to the prognostic factors by Bellmunt (ECOG PS ≥ 1, liver involvement, haemoglobin < 10 g/dL), we identified peritoneal metastases as a factor associated with significantly worse survival (HR = 0.28, 95% CI 0.11-0.72, p < 0.00001 for PFS, HR = 0.30, 95% CI 0.12-0.75, p < 0.00001 for OS, respectively). Conclusions: The SII at baseline of treatment with second-line vinflunine represents a prognostic factor for pts. with MUC. Based on SII, pts. could be stratified into clinical trials in future. MUC pts. with high SII might be candidates for a different treatment approach. Key Words: Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma. Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index. Vinflunine. Progression-Free Survival. Overall Survival.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document