CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy) for the detection of colorectal polyps and neoplasms

2002 ◽  
Vol 38 (16) ◽  
pp. 2070-2078 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.M Gluecker ◽  
J.G Fletcher
2008 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 320-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hassan Siddiki ◽  
J. G. Fletcher ◽  
Beth McFarland ◽  
Nora Dajani ◽  
Nicholas Orme ◽  
...  

Just over ten years ago, the first human trials of virtual colonoscopy, or computed tomography (CT) colonography, were performed. CT colonography (CTC), as it is now called, is a low radiation dose CT examination of the abdomen and pelvis following bowel purgation cleansing and insuflation (inflation) of the colon and rectum. High spatial resolution CT datasets of the abdomen and pelvis are obtained while the patient is lying in the prone and supine positions, with the entire procedure lasting about ten minutes. The resulting images are interactively reviewed on a dedicated computer workstation using 2D multiplanar images and 3D endoluminal displays of the colon. Over the past decade, rapid technological advancements in image acquisition, 3D display techniques, colonic insuflation, and stool tagging (i.e., labeling of stool with ingested radio-opaque contrast) have occurred, which have greatly improved the ability of CT colonography to detect colorectal polyps and cancer.


Endoscopy ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 36 (05) ◽  
Author(s):  
RJT Sadleir ◽  
PF Whelan ◽  
N Sezille ◽  
TA Chowdhury ◽  
A Moss ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 201-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph Vogt ◽  
Mathias Cohnen ◽  
Andreas Beck ◽  
Stephan vom Dahl ◽  
Volker Aurich ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 90-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Odery Ramos Jr. ◽  
César Luiz Boguszewski ◽  
Sandra Teixeira ◽  
Ricardo De Bem ◽  
Benito Parolim ◽  
...  

CONTEXT: Acromegalic patients have better chances to develop colorectal polyps and cancer and, considered a high-risk group, need to undergo frequent screening examinations. Moreover, in acromegalia, the increased bowel length and the intestinal loop complexity can lead to higher levels of technical difficulties and increase the risks of complications at conventional colonoscopy. Computed tomographic colonography, also known as virtual colonoscopy, is an innovative and secure technology which is revolutionizing the diagnosis of colon and rectum neoplasias. OBJECTIVE: To analyze computed tomographic colonography performance for the screening of colorectal polyps in acromegalic patients. METHODS: A prospective study of 21 asymptomatic acromegalic patients, 12 male and 9 female, average age 49, who underwent computed tomographic colonography and conventional colonoscopy. Computed tomographic colonography was performed with a GE Helical Multislice Computed Tomography Apparatus. Conventional colonoscopy was performed in the same day, without previous knowledge of the computed tomographic colonography diagnostics. The study evaluated the capacity of computed tomographic colonography to detect patients with colorectal polyps and identify each colorectal lesion described by the colonoscopy. RESULTS: In two patients (2/21), conventional colonoscopy was incomplete. However, in all patients computed tomographic colonography was complete. In Phase I ("per patient"), computed tomographic colonography diagnosed eight of the nine patients with colorectal polyps and showed 88% sensitivity, 75% specificity and 81% accuracy. In Phase II ("per polyp"), out of the 21 acromegalic patients included in this study, 12 presented normal findings at conventional colonoscopy. A total of 19 polyps were identified in 9 patients. Ten of the 19 polyps were smaller than 10 mm, and 9 were equal to or larger than 10 mm. Computed tomographic colonography identified 7 of the 9 polyps >10 mm described by conventional colonoscopy and only 6 of the 10 small polyps identified at conventional colonoscopy were detected by computed tomographic colonography. The histological analysis of resected lesions revealed 12 tubular adenomas, 6 hyperplastic polyps and 1 colonic tubulo-villous adenoma with an adenocarcinoma focus. CONCLUSION: The authors present the first reports of computed tomographic colonography in the screening of colorectal polyps in acromegalic patients. In this study, computed tomographic colonography was performed without complications and a complete and safe colorectal evaluation was possible in all acromegalic patients. Moreover, computed tomographic colonography presented good sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for the identification of acromegalic patients with polyps of any size and better results in the diagnosis of large polyps, when they were compared to small polypoid lesions.


2001 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 133-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benoit C. Pineau ◽  
Electra D. Paskett ◽  
G. John Chen ◽  
Valerie L. Durkalski ◽  
Mark A. Espeland ◽  
...  

Radiology ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 237 (3) ◽  
pp. 927-937 ◽  
Author(s):  
Riccardo Iannaccone ◽  
Carlo Catalano ◽  
Filippo Mangiapane ◽  
Takamichi Murakami ◽  
Antonietta Lamazza ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 222-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Röttgen ◽  
F. Fischbach ◽  
M. Plotkin ◽  
H. Herzog ◽  
T. Freund ◽  
...  

Purpose: To improve the sensitivity of computed tomography (CT) colonography in the detection of polyps by comparing the 3D reconstruction tool “colon dissection” and endoluminal view (virtual colonoscopy) with axial 2D reconstructions. Material and Methods: Forty‐eight patients (22 M, 26 F, mean age 57±21) were studied after intra‐anal air insufflation in the supine and prone positions using a 16‐slice helical CT (16×0.625 mm, pitch 1.7; detector rotation time 0.5 s; 160 mAs und 120 kV) and conventional colonoscopy. Two radiologists blinded to the results of the conventional colonoscopy analyzed the 3D reconstruction in virtual‐endoscopy mode, in colon‐dissection mode, and axial 2D slices. Results: Conventional colonoscopy revealed a total of 35 polyps in 15 patients; 33 polyps were disclosed by CT methods. Sensitivity and specificity for detecting colon polyps were 94% and 94%, respectively, when using the “colon dissection”, 89% and 94% when using “virtual endoscopy”, and 62% and 100% when using axial 2D reconstruction. Sensitivity in relation to the diameter of colon polyps with “colon dissection”, “virtual colonoscopy”, and axial 2D‐slices was: polyps with a diameter >5.0 mm, 100%, 100%, and 71%, respectively; polyps with a diameter of between 3 and 4.9 mm, 92%, 85%, and 46%; and polyps with a diameter <3 mm, 89%, 78%, and 56%. The difference between “virtual endoscopy” and “colon dissection” in diagnosing polyps up to 4.9 mm in diameter was statistically significant. Conclusion: 3D reconstruction software “colon dissection” improves sensitivity of CT colonography compared with the endoluminal view.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document