1226 Dying with dignity — care giving to dying cancer patients in hospitals

2003 ◽  
Vol 1 (5) ◽  
pp. S374
Author(s):  
C. Brejnebøl ◽  
M. Grindsted
2007 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 80-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yaacov G. Bachner ◽  
Norm O'Rourke ◽  
Sara Carmel

Most care received by cancer patients is provided in the community by informal or unpaid caregivers. The unrelenting care demands can lead to physical, emotional, social, and financial reactions; furthermore, studies indicate that the effects of caregiving may endure after the patient's death. A need therefore exists for instruments measuring both caregiving and post-caregiving reactions. Among available instruments, the Caregiver Reaction Assessment (CRA) is a multidimensional, 5-factor measure designed to assess the negative and positive aspects of caregiving. The current study examined the psychometric properties and factor structure of responses to a modified Hebrew version of the CRA aimed at measuring caregiving and post-care-giving reactions. Although the scale was modified, it was assumed that, similar to the original CRA, a 5-factor structure would be supported by means of confirmatory factor analysis. A total of 236 bereaved primary caregivers of cancer patients from central and southern regions of Israel were recruited over a period of 18 months. As hypothesized, results provide support for a 5-factor structure of responses to this modified version of the CRA. The concurrent validity of responses to the scale was also supported. Replication of the findings with randomly derived and larger sample sizes is needed.


2021 ◽  
pp. 80-81
Author(s):  
.Ajay Kumar Kondeti ◽  
Ambedkar Yadala

Objectives: Family Caregivers (FCs) of cancer patients often suffer from impaired quality of life (QOL) due to stress arising from the responsibility of care giving. Thus, in this study we assessed family caregivers (FCs) quality of life and its association with demographic variables during inpatient palliative care (IPC) of their advanced cancer patients. Material and Methods: 211 FCs of advanced cancer patients were assessed using either English or Telugu versions of the Caregiver Quality of Life Cancer (CQOLC) index scales to evaluate their QOL. We used descriptive and correlation analyses to obtain statistical results.. Results: The summative mean CQOLC score was 54.42+/- 19.7. Statistically signicant higher scores were observed for FCs who reside in rural regions (p=0.27) and those who belong to Below poverty line (BPL) families (p=0.035) suggesting poor quality of life among these groups. High CQOLC score was noticed for socially backward (OBC's, SC and ST castes) communities, but statistically not signicant (p=0.210). Conclusion: FCs from rural regions and lower income groups experience poor QOL. Regular assessment, resource support and specialist care are needed for improving FCs quality of life.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9540-9540
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Trice Loggers ◽  
Holly Gwen Prigerson

9540 Background: Cancers are defined as rare if fewer than 35,000 cases are diagnosed per year. Rare cancers represented 23% of incident cancer cases and 33% of cancer deaths in 2008. However, little is known about the end-of-life (EOL) experience of patients with rare cancers or their caregivers. Methods: From September 2002 to August 2008, 618 advanced cancer patients (195 with rare and 423 with common stage IV cancers following failure of first line chemotherapy) and their caregivers participated in a U.S. multi-site, prospective, interview-based cohort study (Coping with Cancer). Patients were interviewed about EOL preferences, planning, and care at study entry. Interviews with caregivers at baseline assessed caregiver mental and physical health, while post-mortem surveys assessed EOL patient care. Descriptive statistics (t-test, chi-square) were used to characterize the study sample; logistic regression tested the association between cancer type and care received, controlling for confounders. Results: Rare cancer participants were more likely to be younger (57.7 vs 60.7 years, p=.01), Hispanic (19% vs 9%, p=.002) and have fewer co-morbidities (Charlson comorbidity index, mean 5.9 vs 6.5, p=.004), than their common-cancer counterparts. Rare cancers patients were four times more likely to be receiving both radiation and chemotherapy at study entry than common cancer patients (10.3% versus 3.3%, OR 4.31, p=0.003), but equally as likely to acknowledge their illness was terminal, have EOL discussions, and participate in advance care planning as common cancer patients. Caregivers of patients with rare cancers were more likely than common cancer caregivers to report declining health during the prior year of care-giving (22.1% versus 15.7%, p=0.05) and marginally more likely to prefer the patient choose treatment focusing on extending life rather than pain relief (22.3% vs 16.5%, p=0.08). Conclusions: Patients with advanced-stage, rare cancers may be treated more aggressively following failure of first line chemotherapy than individuals with common cancers. Future research should investigate patterns and quality of care for terminally ill patients with rare cancers and caregiver burden.


Author(s):  
Venkata Phani Madhavi Kajana ◽  
Amaleswari Katta ◽  
Devi Madhavi Bhimarasetty

Background: A large number of patients with chronic diseases like cancer are cared for in homes by the family members. The vital role that these family members play as “caregivers” is well recognized. However, the burden on them is poorly understood. The objective of the study was to assess the caregiving burden among family caregivers of breast cancer patients and to explore the factors associated with high levels of caregiving burden among family members of breast cancer patients.Methods: A cross-sectional, hospital based study was conducted in a tertiary health care setting in Visakhapatnam A total of 45 primary caregivers who were accompanying the breast cancer patients to the Government Hospital were interviewed using Zarit burden interview. The socio demographic variables of the care givers like age, gender, occupation, income, relation with the patient were also obtained. Informed consent was obtained from the caregiver. Data analysis: Data was entered in the MS Excel spread sheet and it was analysed using SPSS software version 21.0.Results: The study population consisted of 26 (57.7%) males and 19 (42.3%) female caregivers. Very few 4 (9%) caregivers reported with no or mild burden during care giving. Majority 18 (40%) of the caregivers reported with mild to moderate burden, whereas 18 (40%) of the caregivers reported with moderate to severe burden. Few 5 (11%) reported with severe burden. Financial factors and uncertainty regarding the illness of the patient are associated with more burden.Conclusions: There is high burden among caregivers of cancer patients which should be addressed.


2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 68-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine S. Shaker

Current research on feeding outcomes after discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) suggests a need to critically look at the early underpinnings of persistent feeding problems in extremely preterm infants. Concepts of dynamic systems theory and sensitive care-giving are used to describe the specialized needs of this fragile population related to the emergence of safe and successful feeding and swallowing. Focusing on the infant as a co-regulatory partner and embracing a framework of an infant-driven, versus volume-driven, feeding approach are highlighted as best supporting the preterm infant's developmental strivings and long-term well-being.


2021 ◽  
Vol 160 (1) ◽  
pp. 234-243
Author(s):  
Diana Samoil ◽  
Nazek Abdelmutti ◽  
Lisa Ould Gallagher ◽  
Nazlin Jivraj ◽  
Naa Kwarley Quartey ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 297-297
Author(s):  
Kristina Schwamborn ◽  
Rene Krieg ◽  
Ruth Knüchel-Clarke ◽  
Joachim Grosse ◽  
Gerhard Jakse

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 130-130
Author(s):  
Markus Graefen ◽  
Jochen Walz ◽  
Andrea Gallina ◽  
Felix K.-H. Chun ◽  
Alwyn M. Reuther ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document