‘False-Positive’ Cath Lab Activation for STEMI Up to 14%

Summary Aim: Even with careful observation, the overall false-positive rate of laparotomy remains 10-15% when acute appendicitis was suspected. Therefore, the clinical efficacy of Tc-99m HMPAO labeled leukocyte (TC-WBC) scan for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in patients presenting with atypical clinical findings is assessed. Patients and Methods: Eighty patients presenting with acute abdominal pain and possible acute appendicitis but atypical findings were included in this study. After intravenous injection of TC-WBC, serial anterior abdominal/pelvic images at 30, 60, 120 and 240 min with 800k counts were obtained with a gamma camera. Any abnormal localization of radioactivity in the right lower quadrant of the abdomen, equal to or greater than bone marrow activity, was considered as a positive scan. Results: 36 out of 49 patients showing positive TC-WBC scans received appendectomy. They all proved to have positive pathological findings. Five positive TC-WBC were not related to acute appendicitis, because of other pathological lesions. Eight patients were not operated and clinical follow-up after one month revealed no acute abdominal condition. Three of 31 patients with negative TC-WBC scans received appendectomy. They also presented positive pathological findings. The remaining 28 patients did not receive operations and revealed no evidence of appendicitis after at least one month of follow-up. The overall sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values for TC-WBC scan to diagnose acute appendicitis were 92, 78, 86, 82, and 90%, respectively. Conclusion: TC-WBC scan provides a rapid and highly accurate method for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in patients with equivocal clinical examination. It proved useful in reducing the false-positive rate of laparotomy and shortens the time necessary for clinical observation.

Download Full-text

Predicting Fetal Chromosome Anomalies in the First Trimester Using Pregnancy Associated Plasma Protein-A: A Comparison of Statistical Methods

Methods of Information in Medicine ◽

10.1055/s-0038-1634910 ◽

1993 ◽

Vol 32 (02) ◽

pp. 175-179 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

B. Brambati ◽

T. Chard ◽

J. G. Grudzinskas ◽

M. C. M. Macintosh

Keyword(s):

Logistic Regression ◽

General Population ◽

Likelihood Ratio ◽

False Positive ◽

False Positive Rate ◽

Ratio Method ◽

Detection Rates ◽

Gaussian Distributions ◽

Positive Rate ◽

Likelihood Ratio Method

Abstract:The analysis of the clinical efficiency of a biochemical parameter in the prediction of chromosome anomalies is described, using a database of 475 cases including 30 abnormalities. A comparison was made of two different approaches to the statistical analysis: the use of Gaussian frequency distributions and likelihood ratios, and logistic regression. Both methods computed that for a 5% false-positive rate approximately 60% of anomalies are detected on the basis of maternal age and serum PAPP-A. The logistic regression analysis is appropriate where the outcome variable (chromosome anomaly) is binary and the detection rates refer to the original data only. The likelihood ratio method is used to predict the outcome in the general population. The latter method depends on the data or some transformation of the data fitting a known frequency distribution (Gaussian in this case). The precision of the predicted detection rates is limited by the small sample of abnormals (30 cases). Varying the means and standard deviations (to the limits of their 95% confidence intervals) of the fitted log Gaussian distributions resulted in a detection rate varying between 42% and 79% for a 5% false-positive rate. Thus, although the likelihood ratio method is potentially the better method in determining the usefulness of a test in the general population, larger numbers of abnormal cases are required to stabilise the means and standard deviations of the fitted log Gaussian distributions.

Download Full-text

RISK FACTORS FOR FALSE-POSITIVE AND FALSE-NEGATIVE FECAL IMMUNOCHEMICAL TEST RESULTS IN COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

10.1055/s-0038-1637308 ◽

2018 ◽

Author(s):

CM de Klerk ◽

LM Vendrig ◽

PM Bossuyt ◽

E Dekker

Keyword(s):

Colorectal Cancer ◽

Risk Factors ◽

Systematic Review ◽

Cancer Screening ◽

Colorectal Cancer Screening ◽

False Positive ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

False Negative ◽

Test Results ◽

Immunochemical Test

Download Full-text

Critical Evaluation of Impedance Phlebography for the Diagnosis of Deep Vein Thrombosis

Thrombosis and Haemostasis ◽

10.1055/s-0038-1649161 ◽

1974 ◽

Vol 31 (02) ◽

pp. 273-278

Author(s):

Kenneth K Wu ◽

John C Hoak ◽

Robert W Barnes ◽

Stuart L Frankel

Keyword(s):

Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽

False Positive ◽

False Negative ◽

Critical Evaluation ◽

Original Method ◽

Vein Thrombosis ◽

Negative Results ◽

False Negative Results ◽

Deep Vein ◽

Positive Results

SummaryIn order to evaluate its daily variability and reliability, impedance phlebography was performed daily or on alternate days on 61 patients with deep vein thrombosis, of whom 47 also had 125I-fibrinogen uptake tests and 22 had radiographic venography. The results showed that impedance phlebography was highly variable and poorly reliable. False positive results were noted in 8 limbs (18%) and false negative results in 3 limbs (7%). Despite its being simple, rapid and noninvasive, its clinical usefulness is doubtful when performed according to the original method.

Download Full-text